Loading…

GEOPHAGY IN THE AFRICAN ELEPHANT IN RELATION TO AVAILABILITY OF DIETARY SODIUM

We studied the use of mineral licks by African elephants (Loxodonta africana) during the dry season in a Kalahari-sand habitat in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, to investigate the role of geophagy as a mechanism for supplementing low Na+ levels in browse and natural water supplies. Plant, water, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mammalogy 2002-08, Vol.83 (3), p.652-664
Main Authors: Holdø, Ricardo M., Dudley, Joseph P., McDowell, Lee R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 664
container_issue 3
container_start_page 652
container_title Journal of mammalogy
container_volume 83
creator Holdø, Ricardo M.
Dudley, Joseph P.
McDowell, Lee R.
description We studied the use of mineral licks by African elephants (Loxodonta africana) during the dry season in a Kalahari-sand habitat in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, to investigate the role of geophagy as a mechanism for supplementing low Na+ levels in browse and natural water supplies. Plant, water, and soil macrominerals were measured to evaluate mineral availability for elephants during the dry season. Elephant behavior was monitored at licks to investigate the intensity of geophagy (measured by number of mouthfuls of soil consumed) in relation to fecal-Na+ loss. Female elephants, which probably had greater requirements than did males because of pregnancy and lactation, consumed more mouthfuls of soil and spent a greater part of their activity budget feeding on soil than did males, suggesting that geophagy may be driven by a nutritional requirement. We found the following consistent with the Na+-supplementation hypothesis: 1) unlike other minerals, Na+ in woody plants and natural water supplies may be inadequate to meet the minimum requirements of elephants during the dry season; 2) soils consumed by elephants differed from other soils primarily in their high Na+ content; 3) intensity of geophagy was negatively correlated with fecal Na+; and 4) elephants in non–Kalahari-sand habitats do not appear to create or use licks, probably because they are able to meet their Na+ requirements from ubiquitous Na+-rich water supplies, which do not occur naturally in Kalahari-sand habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.1644/1545-1542%282002%29083%3C0652%3AGITAEI%3E2.0.CO%3B2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221508177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1383529</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1383529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1527-76a0b0c6f1b9bbf8225d7f3e680558d237dd7b8fbf5a2e8f3a93079fe43c42a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1v2zAMhoViBZp1-wc7GAN8dEpTliVjJ9VREgFe3GXOgJwEObGABF3c2ulh_35ynXW9kADflx_gQ8i3GKZxmiR3MUtY5AOGKBDApwwEDWkOKcOQyoWupNIhVTiFaV6G9B6vyOSt6wOZ-CaMkHK8IR_7_ggAjCNMyGqhyoelXGwDvQqqpQrkfK1zuQpUoXx9VQ31tSpkpUtvKAP5S-pC3utCV9ugnAczrSq53gY_y5nefP9Erp197JvPl3xLNnNV5cuoKBd-bBHVMUMe8dRCDbvUxXVW104gsj13tEkFMCb2_s79ntfC1Y5ZbISjNqPAM9ckdJegTekt-TrOfera55emP5tj-9Kd_EqDGDMQMefeFF5Mtt_ZR9fZ0-7Qm6fu8Nt2f0xMhfBfod73ZfQd-3Pbvdcpw8zLP0a5PrTtqfmvgxngmOHNQ0AzwjGvcMwIx_yDYzwcAyYvjYdD_wL4bXx7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221508177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GEOPHAGY IN THE AFRICAN ELEPHANT IN RELATION TO AVAILABILITY OF DIETARY SODIUM</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Holdø, Ricardo M. ; Dudley, Joseph P. ; McDowell, Lee R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holdø, Ricardo M. ; Dudley, Joseph P. ; McDowell, Lee R.</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the use of mineral licks by African elephants (Loxodonta africana) during the dry season in a Kalahari-sand habitat in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, to investigate the role of geophagy as a mechanism for supplementing low Na+ levels in browse and natural water supplies. Plant, water, and soil macrominerals were measured to evaluate mineral availability for elephants during the dry season. Elephant behavior was monitored at licks to investigate the intensity of geophagy (measured by number of mouthfuls of soil consumed) in relation to fecal-Na+ loss. Female elephants, which probably had greater requirements than did males because of pregnancy and lactation, consumed more mouthfuls of soil and spent a greater part of their activity budget feeding on soil than did males, suggesting that geophagy may be driven by a nutritional requirement. We found the following consistent with the Na+-supplementation hypothesis: 1) unlike other minerals, Na+ in woody plants and natural water supplies may be inadequate to meet the minimum requirements of elephants during the dry season; 2) soils consumed by elephants differed from other soils primarily in their high Na+ content; 3) intensity of geophagy was negatively correlated with fecal Na+; and 4) elephants in non–Kalahari-sand habitats do not appear to create or use licks, probably because they are able to meet their Na+ requirements from ubiquitous Na+-rich water supplies, which do not occur naturally in Kalahari-sand habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542%282002%29083%3C0652%3AGITAEI%3E2.0.CO%3B2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMAAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Provo, UT: American Society of Mammalogists</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Deserts ; Dry season ; Dry seasons ; Elephants ; FEATURE ARTICLES ; Female animals ; Forage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; geophagy ; Habitats ; Hwange National Park ; Kalahari sands ; licks ; Loxodonta africana ; Male animals ; Mammalia ; Minerals ; National parks ; Sodium ; Soil pollution ; Soil samples ; Vertebrata ; Water samples ; Water supply ; Zimbabwe ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of mammalogy, 2002-08, Vol.83 (3), p.652-664</ispartof><rights>American Society of Mammalogists</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 The American Society of Mammalogists</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Mammalogists Aug 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1383529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1383529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13880223$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holdø, Ricardo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, Lee R.</creatorcontrib><title>GEOPHAGY IN THE AFRICAN ELEPHANT IN RELATION TO AVAILABILITY OF DIETARY SODIUM</title><title>Journal of mammalogy</title><description>We studied the use of mineral licks by African elephants (Loxodonta africana) during the dry season in a Kalahari-sand habitat in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, to investigate the role of geophagy as a mechanism for supplementing low Na+ levels in browse and natural water supplies. Plant, water, and soil macrominerals were measured to evaluate mineral availability for elephants during the dry season. Elephant behavior was monitored at licks to investigate the intensity of geophagy (measured by number of mouthfuls of soil consumed) in relation to fecal-Na+ loss. Female elephants, which probably had greater requirements than did males because of pregnancy and lactation, consumed more mouthfuls of soil and spent a greater part of their activity budget feeding on soil than did males, suggesting that geophagy may be driven by a nutritional requirement. We found the following consistent with the Na+-supplementation hypothesis: 1) unlike other minerals, Na+ in woody plants and natural water supplies may be inadequate to meet the minimum requirements of elephants during the dry season; 2) soils consumed by elephants differed from other soils primarily in their high Na+ content; 3) intensity of geophagy was negatively correlated with fecal Na+; and 4) elephants in non–Kalahari-sand habitats do not appear to create or use licks, probably because they are able to meet their Na+ requirements from ubiquitous Na+-rich water supplies, which do not occur naturally in Kalahari-sand habitats.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Dry seasons</subject><subject>Elephants</subject><subject>FEATURE ARTICLES</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>geophagy</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hwange National Park</subject><subject>Kalahari sands</subject><subject>licks</subject><subject>Loxodonta africana</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil samples</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Water samples</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Zimbabwe</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkU1v2zAMhoViBZp1-wc7GAN8dEpTliVjJ9VREgFe3GXOgJwEObGABF3c2ulh_35ynXW9kADflx_gQ8i3GKZxmiR3MUtY5AOGKBDApwwEDWkOKcOQyoWupNIhVTiFaV6G9B6vyOSt6wOZ-CaMkHK8IR_7_ggAjCNMyGqhyoelXGwDvQqqpQrkfK1zuQpUoXx9VQ31tSpkpUtvKAP5S-pC3utCV9ugnAczrSq53gY_y5nefP9Erp197JvPl3xLNnNV5cuoKBd-bBHVMUMe8dRCDbvUxXVW104gsj13tEkFMCb2_s79ntfC1Y5ZbISjNqPAM9ckdJegTekt-TrOfera55emP5tj-9Kd_EqDGDMQMefeFF5Mtt_ZR9fZ0-7Qm6fu8Nt2f0xMhfBfod73ZfQd-3Pbvdcpw8zLP0a5PrTtqfmvgxngmOHNQ0AzwjGvcMwIx_yDYzwcAyYvjYdD_wL4bXx7</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Holdø, Ricardo M.</creator><creator>Dudley, Joseph P.</creator><creator>McDowell, Lee R.</creator><general>American Society of Mammalogists</general><general>Brigham Young University, Department of Zoology</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>GEOPHAGY IN THE AFRICAN ELEPHANT IN RELATION TO AVAILABILITY OF DIETARY SODIUM</title><author>Holdø, Ricardo M. ; Dudley, Joseph P. ; McDowell, Lee R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1527-76a0b0c6f1b9bbf8225d7f3e680558d237dd7b8fbf5a2e8f3a93079fe43c42a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Dry seasons</topic><topic>Elephants</topic><topic>FEATURE ARTICLES</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>geophagy</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hwange National Park</topic><topic>Kalahari sands</topic><topic>licks</topic><topic>Loxodonta africana</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil samples</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Water samples</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Zimbabwe</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holdø, Ricardo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, Lee R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holdø, Ricardo M.</au><au>Dudley, Joseph P.</au><au>McDowell, Lee R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GEOPHAGY IN THE AFRICAN ELEPHANT IN RELATION TO AVAILABILITY OF DIETARY SODIUM</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>652</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>652-664</pages><issn>0022-2372</issn><eissn>1545-1542</eissn><coden>JOMAAL</coden><abstract>We studied the use of mineral licks by African elephants (Loxodonta africana) during the dry season in a Kalahari-sand habitat in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, to investigate the role of geophagy as a mechanism for supplementing low Na+ levels in browse and natural water supplies. Plant, water, and soil macrominerals were measured to evaluate mineral availability for elephants during the dry season. Elephant behavior was monitored at licks to investigate the intensity of geophagy (measured by number of mouthfuls of soil consumed) in relation to fecal-Na+ loss. Female elephants, which probably had greater requirements than did males because of pregnancy and lactation, consumed more mouthfuls of soil and spent a greater part of their activity budget feeding on soil than did males, suggesting that geophagy may be driven by a nutritional requirement. We found the following consistent with the Na+-supplementation hypothesis: 1) unlike other minerals, Na+ in woody plants and natural water supplies may be inadequate to meet the minimum requirements of elephants during the dry season; 2) soils consumed by elephants differed from other soils primarily in their high Na+ content; 3) intensity of geophagy was negatively correlated with fecal Na+; and 4) elephants in non–Kalahari-sand habitats do not appear to create or use licks, probably because they are able to meet their Na+ requirements from ubiquitous Na+-rich water supplies, which do not occur naturally in Kalahari-sand habitats.</abstract><cop>Provo, UT</cop><pub>American Society of Mammalogists</pub><doi>10.1644/1545-1542%282002%29083%3C0652%3AGITAEI%3E2.0.CO%3B2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2372
ispartof Journal of mammalogy, 2002-08, Vol.83 (3), p.652-664
issn 0022-2372
1545-1542
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_221508177
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Deserts
Dry season
Dry seasons
Elephants
FEATURE ARTICLES
Female animals
Forage
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
geophagy
Habitats
Hwange National Park
Kalahari sands
licks
Loxodonta africana
Male animals
Mammalia
Minerals
National parks
Sodium
Soil pollution
Soil samples
Vertebrata
Water samples
Water supply
Zimbabwe
Zoology
title GEOPHAGY IN THE AFRICAN ELEPHANT IN RELATION TO AVAILABILITY OF DIETARY SODIUM
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A26%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GEOPHAGY%20IN%20THE%20AFRICAN%20ELEPHANT%20IN%20RELATION%20TO%20AVAILABILITY%20OF%20DIETARY%20SODIUM&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mammalogy&rft.au=Hold%C3%B8,%20Ricardo%20M.&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=652&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=652-664&rft.issn=0022-2372&rft.eissn=1545-1542&rft.coden=JOMAAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1644/1545-1542%25282002%2529083%253C0652%253AGITAEI%253E2.0.CO%253B2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1383529%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1527-76a0b0c6f1b9bbf8225d7f3e680558d237dd7b8fbf5a2e8f3a93079fe43c42a63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221508177&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1383529&rfr_iscdi=true