Loading…

Evolution of multicellularity: cheating done right

For decades Darwinian processes were framed in the form of the Lewontin conditions: reproduction, variation and differential reproductive success were taken to be sufficient and necessary. Since Buss (The evolution of individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1987 ) and the work of Mayna...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biology & philosophy 2019-04, Vol.34 (3), p.1-22, Article 34
Main Author: Veit, Walter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-6d9a3b02cfa56619d397c9ba44dd438ae3b5ac503ff367af7319600412f17eff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-6d9a3b02cfa56619d397c9ba44dd438ae3b5ac503ff367af7319600412f17eff3
container_end_page 22
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title Biology & philosophy
container_volume 34
creator Veit, Walter
description For decades Darwinian processes were framed in the form of the Lewontin conditions: reproduction, variation and differential reproductive success were taken to be sufficient and necessary. Since Buss (The evolution of individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1987 ) and the work of Maynard Smith and Szathmary (The major transitions in evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995 ) biologists were eager to explain the major transitions from individuals to groups forming new individuals subject to Darwinian mechanisms themselves. Explanations that seek to explain the emergence of a new level of selection, however, cannot employ properties that would already have to exist on that level for selection to take place. Recently, Hammerschmidt et al. (Nature 515:75–79, 2014 ) provided a ‘bottom-up’ experiment corroborating much of the theoretical work Paul Rainey has done since 2003 on how cheats can play an important role in the emergence of new Darwinian individuals on a multicellular level. The aims of this paper are twofold. First, I argue for a conceptual shift in perspective from seeing cheats as (1) a ‘problem’ that needs to be solved for multi-cellularity to evolve to (2) the very ‘key’ for the evolution of multicellularity. Secondly, I illustrate the consequences of this shift for both theoretical and experimental work, arguing for a more prominent role of ecology and the multi-level selection framework within the debate then they currently occupy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10539-019-9688-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2215468566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A583722362</galeid><sourcerecordid>A583722362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-6d9a3b02cfa56619d397c9ba44dd438ae3b5ac503ff367af7319600412f17eff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEYRYMoWB8_wN2AILgYzTsTd0XqAwqCj3VIM8k0ZTpTk4zovzfSQi0oWQQ-zvlC7gXgDMErBKG4jggyIkuIZCl5VZVyD4wQE7isKKT7YAQRlyWpuDgERzEuIIScUjQCePLRt0PyfVf0rlgObfLGtu3Q6uDT101h5lYn3zVF3Xe2CL6ZpxNw4HQb7enmPgZvd5PX24dy-nT_eDueloYxkUpeS01mEBunGedI1kQKI2ea0rqmpNKWzJg2DBLnCBfaCYIkh5Ai7JCweXgMztd7V6F_H2xMatEPoctPKowRo7zKe7dUo1urfOf6FLRZ-mjUmFVEYEw4ztTVH1Q-tV16k7_mfJ7vCJc7QmaS_UyNHmJUjy_Pu-zFLzYH1qZ53KQad0G0Bk3oYwzWqVXwSx2-FILqp0a1rlHlGtVPjUpmB6-dmNmusWGbwv_SN2wpm8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2215468566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of multicellularity: cheating done right</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Veit, Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>Veit, Walter</creatorcontrib><description>For decades Darwinian processes were framed in the form of the Lewontin conditions: reproduction, variation and differential reproductive success were taken to be sufficient and necessary. Since Buss (The evolution of individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1987 ) and the work of Maynard Smith and Szathmary (The major transitions in evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995 ) biologists were eager to explain the major transitions from individuals to groups forming new individuals subject to Darwinian mechanisms themselves. Explanations that seek to explain the emergence of a new level of selection, however, cannot employ properties that would already have to exist on that level for selection to take place. Recently, Hammerschmidt et al. (Nature 515:75–79, 2014 ) provided a ‘bottom-up’ experiment corroborating much of the theoretical work Paul Rainey has done since 2003 on how cheats can play an important role in the emergence of new Darwinian individuals on a multicellular level. The aims of this paper are twofold. First, I argue for a conceptual shift in perspective from seeing cheats as (1) a ‘problem’ that needs to be solved for multi-cellularity to evolve to (2) the very ‘key’ for the evolution of multicellularity. Secondly, I illustrate the consequences of this shift for both theoretical and experimental work, arguing for a more prominent role of ecology and the multi-level selection framework within the debate then they currently occupy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-3867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10539-019-9688-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Breeding success ; Ecology ; Education ; Evolution ; Evolutionary Biology ; Nature ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Biology ; Reproduction ; Selective breeding</subject><ispartof>Biology &amp; philosophy, 2019-04, Vol.34 (3), p.1-22, Article 34</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Biology &amp; Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-6d9a3b02cfa56619d397c9ba44dd438ae3b5ac503ff367af7319600412f17eff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-6d9a3b02cfa56619d397c9ba44dd438ae3b5ac503ff367af7319600412f17eff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7701-8995</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veit, Walter</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of multicellularity: cheating done right</title><title>Biology &amp; philosophy</title><addtitle>Biol Philos</addtitle><description>For decades Darwinian processes were framed in the form of the Lewontin conditions: reproduction, variation and differential reproductive success were taken to be sufficient and necessary. Since Buss (The evolution of individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1987 ) and the work of Maynard Smith and Szathmary (The major transitions in evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995 ) biologists were eager to explain the major transitions from individuals to groups forming new individuals subject to Darwinian mechanisms themselves. Explanations that seek to explain the emergence of a new level of selection, however, cannot employ properties that would already have to exist on that level for selection to take place. Recently, Hammerschmidt et al. (Nature 515:75–79, 2014 ) provided a ‘bottom-up’ experiment corroborating much of the theoretical work Paul Rainey has done since 2003 on how cheats can play an important role in the emergence of new Darwinian individuals on a multicellular level. The aims of this paper are twofold. First, I argue for a conceptual shift in perspective from seeing cheats as (1) a ‘problem’ that needs to be solved for multi-cellularity to evolve to (2) the very ‘key’ for the evolution of multicellularity. Secondly, I illustrate the consequences of this shift for both theoretical and experimental work, arguing for a more prominent role of ecology and the multi-level selection framework within the debate then they currently occupy.</description><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Biology</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Selective breeding</subject><issn>0169-3867</issn><issn>1572-8404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEYRYMoWB8_wN2AILgYzTsTd0XqAwqCj3VIM8k0ZTpTk4zovzfSQi0oWQQ-zvlC7gXgDMErBKG4jggyIkuIZCl5VZVyD4wQE7isKKT7YAQRlyWpuDgERzEuIIScUjQCePLRt0PyfVf0rlgObfLGtu3Q6uDT101h5lYn3zVF3Xe2CL6ZpxNw4HQb7enmPgZvd5PX24dy-nT_eDueloYxkUpeS01mEBunGedI1kQKI2ea0rqmpNKWzJg2DBLnCBfaCYIkh5Ai7JCweXgMztd7V6F_H2xMatEPoctPKowRo7zKe7dUo1urfOf6FLRZ-mjUmFVEYEw4ztTVH1Q-tV16k7_mfJ7vCJc7QmaS_UyNHmJUjy_Pu-zFLzYH1qZ53KQad0G0Bk3oYwzWqVXwSx2-FILqp0a1rlHlGtVPjUpmB6-dmNmusWGbwv_SN2wpm8w</recordid><startdate>20190426</startdate><enddate>20190426</enddate><creator>Veit, Walter</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7701-8995</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190426</creationdate><title>Evolution of multicellularity: cheating done right</title><author>Veit, Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-6d9a3b02cfa56619d397c9ba44dd438ae3b5ac503ff367af7319600412f17eff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Biology</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Selective breeding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veit, Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Biology &amp; philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veit, Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of multicellularity: cheating done right</atitle><jtitle>Biology &amp; philosophy</jtitle><stitle>Biol Philos</stitle><date>2019-04-26</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><artnum>34</artnum><issn>0169-3867</issn><eissn>1572-8404</eissn><abstract>For decades Darwinian processes were framed in the form of the Lewontin conditions: reproduction, variation and differential reproductive success were taken to be sufficient and necessary. Since Buss (The evolution of individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1987 ) and the work of Maynard Smith and Szathmary (The major transitions in evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995 ) biologists were eager to explain the major transitions from individuals to groups forming new individuals subject to Darwinian mechanisms themselves. Explanations that seek to explain the emergence of a new level of selection, however, cannot employ properties that would already have to exist on that level for selection to take place. Recently, Hammerschmidt et al. (Nature 515:75–79, 2014 ) provided a ‘bottom-up’ experiment corroborating much of the theoretical work Paul Rainey has done since 2003 on how cheats can play an important role in the emergence of new Darwinian individuals on a multicellular level. The aims of this paper are twofold. First, I argue for a conceptual shift in perspective from seeing cheats as (1) a ‘problem’ that needs to be solved for multi-cellularity to evolve to (2) the very ‘key’ for the evolution of multicellularity. Secondly, I illustrate the consequences of this shift for both theoretical and experimental work, arguing for a more prominent role of ecology and the multi-level selection framework within the debate then they currently occupy.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10539-019-9688-9</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7701-8995</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-3867
ispartof Biology & philosophy, 2019-04, Vol.34 (3), p.1-22, Article 34
issn 0169-3867
1572-8404
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2215468566
source Springer Link
subjects Breeding success
Ecology
Education
Evolution
Evolutionary Biology
Nature
Philosophy
Philosophy of Biology
Reproduction
Selective breeding
title Evolution of multicellularity: cheating done right
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A07%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20multicellularity:%20cheating%20done%20right&rft.jtitle=Biology%20&%20philosophy&rft.au=Veit,%20Walter&rft.date=2019-04-26&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.artnum=34&rft.issn=0169-3867&rft.eissn=1572-8404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10539-019-9688-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA583722362%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-6d9a3b02cfa56619d397c9ba44dd438ae3b5ac503ff367af7319600412f17eff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2215468566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A583722362&rfr_iscdi=true