Loading…
Parallel Analysis with Unidimensional Binary Data
The present simulation investigated the performance of parallel analysis for unidimensional binary data. Single-factor models with 8 and 20 indicators were examined, and sample size (50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000), factor loading (.45, .70, and .90), response ratio on two categories (50/50, 60/40, 70...
Saved in:
Published in: | Educational and psychological measurement 2005-10, Vol.65 (5), p.697-716 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-b85c32ffd6b5ff41e641786969b7df5de9858511fb780b380ace0c5cd08ba5333 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-b85c32ffd6b5ff41e641786969b7df5de9858511fb780b380ace0c5cd08ba5333 |
container_end_page | 716 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 697 |
container_title | Educational and psychological measurement |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Weng, Li-Jen Cheng, Chung-Ping |
description | The present simulation investigated the performance of parallel analysis for unidimensional binary data. Single-factor models with 8 and 20 indicators were examined, and sample size (50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000), factor loading (.45, .70, and .90), response ratio on two categories (50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10), and types of correlation coefficients (phi and tetrachoric correlations) were manipulated. The results indicated that parallel analysis performed well in identifying the number of factors. The performance improved as factor loading and sample size increased and as the percentages of responses on two categories became close. Using the 95th and 99th percentiles of the random data eigenvalues as the criteria for comparison in parallel analysis yielded higher correct rate than using mean eigenvalues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0013164404273941 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221549013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ718008</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0013164404273941</sage_id><sourcerecordid>906036981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-b85c32ffd6b5ff41e641786969b7df5de9858511fb780b380ace0c5cd08ba5333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UDtPwzAQthBIlMLOwBCxG-5iO3bGUspLlWCgc-QkNrhKk2KnQv33OAoCCYlbTrrvcd8dIecIV4hSXgMgw4xz4KlkOccDMkEhUsqUUodkMsB0wI_JSQhriMURJwRftNdNY5pk1upmH1xIPl3_nqxaV7uNaYPr4jy5ca32--RW9_qUHFndBHP23adkdbd4nT_Q5fP943y2pJqJtKelEhVLra2zUljL0WQcpcryLC9lbUVtciWUQLSlVFAyBboyUImqBlVqwRibksvRd-u7j50JfbHudj6GCUWaouB5vCiSYCRVvgvBG1tsvdvEqAVCMfyl-PuXKLkYJca76oe-eJKoAFSE6QgH_WZ-V_5r9wU1r2md</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221549013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallel Analysis with Unidimensional Binary Data</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Weng, Li-Jen ; Cheng, Chung-Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Weng, Li-Jen ; Cheng, Chung-Ping</creatorcontrib><description>The present simulation investigated the performance of parallel analysis for unidimensional binary data. Single-factor models with 8 and 20 indicators were examined, and sample size (50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000), factor loading (.45, .70, and .90), response ratio on two categories (50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10), and types of correlation coefficients (phi and tetrachoric correlations) were manipulated. The results indicated that parallel analysis performed well in identifying the number of factors. The performance improved as factor loading and sample size increased and as the percentages of responses on two categories became close. Using the 95th and 99th percentiles of the random data eigenvalues as the criteria for comparison in parallel analysis yielded higher correct rate than using mean eigenvalues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0013164404273941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Data Analysis ; Eigenvalues ; Evaluation Methods ; Factor Analysis ; Responses ; Sample Size</subject><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 2005-10, Vol.65 (5), p.697-716</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-b85c32ffd6b5ff41e641786969b7df5de9858511fb780b380ace0c5cd08ba5333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-b85c32ffd6b5ff41e641786969b7df5de9858511fb780b380ace0c5cd08ba5333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ718008$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weng, Li-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chung-Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Parallel Analysis with Unidimensional Binary Data</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><description>The present simulation investigated the performance of parallel analysis for unidimensional binary data. Single-factor models with 8 and 20 indicators were examined, and sample size (50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000), factor loading (.45, .70, and .90), response ratio on two categories (50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10), and types of correlation coefficients (phi and tetrachoric correlations) were manipulated. The results indicated that parallel analysis performed well in identifying the number of factors. The performance improved as factor loading and sample size increased and as the percentages of responses on two categories became close. Using the 95th and 99th percentiles of the random data eigenvalues as the criteria for comparison in parallel analysis yielded higher correct rate than using mean eigenvalues.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UDtPwzAQthBIlMLOwBCxG-5iO3bGUspLlWCgc-QkNrhKk2KnQv33OAoCCYlbTrrvcd8dIecIV4hSXgMgw4xz4KlkOccDMkEhUsqUUodkMsB0wI_JSQhriMURJwRftNdNY5pk1upmH1xIPl3_nqxaV7uNaYPr4jy5ca32--RW9_qUHFndBHP23adkdbd4nT_Q5fP943y2pJqJtKelEhVLra2zUljL0WQcpcryLC9lbUVtciWUQLSlVFAyBboyUImqBlVqwRibksvRd-u7j50JfbHudj6GCUWaouB5vCiSYCRVvgvBG1tsvdvEqAVCMfyl-PuXKLkYJca76oe-eJKoAFSE6QgH_WZ-V_5r9wU1r2md</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Weng, Li-Jen</creator><creator>Cheng, Chung-Ping</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Parallel Analysis with Unidimensional Binary Data</title><author>Weng, Li-Jen ; Cheng, Chung-Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-b85c32ffd6b5ff41e641786969b7df5de9858511fb780b380ace0c5cd08ba5333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weng, Li-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chung-Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weng, Li-Jen</au><au>Cheng, Chung-Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ718008</ericid><atitle>Parallel Analysis with Unidimensional Binary Data</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>697</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>697-716</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><abstract>The present simulation investigated the performance of parallel analysis for unidimensional binary data. Single-factor models with 8 and 20 indicators were examined, and sample size (50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000), factor loading (.45, .70, and .90), response ratio on two categories (50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10), and types of correlation coefficients (phi and tetrachoric correlations) were manipulated. The results indicated that parallel analysis performed well in identifying the number of factors. The performance improved as factor loading and sample size increased and as the percentages of responses on two categories became close. Using the 95th and 99th percentiles of the random data eigenvalues as the criteria for comparison in parallel analysis yielded higher correct rate than using mean eigenvalues.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0013164404273941</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-1644 |
ispartof | Educational and psychological measurement, 2005-10, Vol.65 (5), p.697-716 |
issn | 0013-1644 1552-3888 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_221549013 |
source | ERIC; SAGE |
subjects | Comparative analysis Correlation Correlation analysis Data Analysis Eigenvalues Evaluation Methods Factor Analysis Responses Sample Size |
title | Parallel Analysis with Unidimensional Binary Data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A17%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallel%20Analysis%20with%20Unidimensional%20Binary%20Data&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=Weng,%20Li-Jen&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=697&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=697-716&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0013164404273941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E906036981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-b85c32ffd6b5ff41e641786969b7df5de9858511fb780b380ace0c5cd08ba5333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221549013&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ718008&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0013164404273941&rfr_iscdi=true |