Loading…

Predictors of satisfactory employee performance in the South African Department of Health

A study was conducted at the South African Department of Health (DOH) in order to assess the perception held by employees of the DOH at national and provincial levels about the suitability of the Performance Management System (PMS) tool that was being used in the DOH for the assessment and evaluatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Problems and perspectives in management 2017, Vol.15 (2), p.140-147
Main Author: Worku, Zeleke
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2713-ea9c383fda37c1f4c2eb7359d4a0601f51e0f6ec533406683a83cddb7f78eccd3
container_end_page 147
container_issue 2
container_start_page 140
container_title Problems and perspectives in management
container_volume 15
creator Worku, Zeleke
description A study was conducted at the South African Department of Health (DOH) in order to assess the perception held by employees of the DOH at national and provincial levels about the suitability of the Performance Management System (PMS) tool that was being used in the DOH for the assessment and evaluation of the performance of employees working for the DOH at national and provincial level based on their Key Performance Areas (KPAs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The study was based on a stratified random sample of size n=120 employees of the DOH working at national and provincial levels. The study was quantitative, and used methods of data analyses such as frequency tables, cross-tab analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. The degree of productivity of employees at work was measured by using a composite index defined by Le Brasseur, Zannibbi Zinger (2013). Results obtained from the study showed that about 74% of employees held a favorable view of the PMS tool that was used for the assessment and evaluation of employees. The percentage of respondents who viewed the PMS tool as unhelpful was about 26%. The study showed that the view held by employees working in the DOH about the relevance and objectivity of the PMS tool used for the assessment of employee performance in the DOH was significantly and adversely affected by the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of promoting the effectiveness of the DOH as an organization, the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of rewarding deserving employees, and the perception that there were not enough training opportunities in the PMS, in a decreasing order of strength.
doi_str_mv 10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.13
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2221304236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>620533</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9bba5c3de82b49ff816212477044f2c7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>620533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2713-ea9c383fda37c1f4c2eb7359d4a0601f51e0f6ec533406683a83cddb7f78eccd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1v2zAMho1iA9q1_QNFDwJ2WQ9ORUqy7GOQrUuBAh3Q7dCTIMvU4sC2PMk55N_XaYL1xA-QD1_izbIb4AsEBXA_jv0C1De8WyAHvQBxll1ACTxXstCf5lyjzjVXcJ59SWnLueSqUhfZ669ITeumEBMLniU7tcnbQ71n1I9d2BOxkaIPsbeDI9YObNoQewm7acOWPrbODuw7jTZOPQ3TAbIm202bq-yzt12i61O8zP48_Pi9WudPzz8fV8un3KEGkZOtnCiFb6zQDrx0SLUWqmqk5QUHr4C4L8gpISQvilLYUrimqbXXJTnXiMvs8chtgt2aMba9jXsTbGveGyH-NbO21nVkqrq2yomGSqxl5X0JBQJKrbmUHp2eWV-PrDGGfztKk9mGXRxm-QYRQXCJopin8DjlYkgpkv9_Fbh5t8PMdhhQBo052GFAzEu3pyWi0H1wC-Tza-INeuCIDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2221304236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of satisfactory employee performance in the South African Department of Health</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Worku, Zeleke</creator><creatorcontrib>Worku, Zeleke</creatorcontrib><description>A study was conducted at the South African Department of Health (DOH) in order to assess the perception held by employees of the DOH at national and provincial levels about the suitability of the Performance Management System (PMS) tool that was being used in the DOH for the assessment and evaluation of the performance of employees working for the DOH at national and provincial level based on their Key Performance Areas (KPAs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The study was based on a stratified random sample of size n=120 employees of the DOH working at national and provincial levels. The study was quantitative, and used methods of data analyses such as frequency tables, cross-tab analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. The degree of productivity of employees at work was measured by using a composite index defined by Le Brasseur, Zannibbi Zinger (2013). Results obtained from the study showed that about 74% of employees held a favorable view of the PMS tool that was used for the assessment and evaluation of employees. The percentage of respondents who viewed the PMS tool as unhelpful was about 26%. The study showed that the view held by employees working in the DOH about the relevance and objectivity of the PMS tool used for the assessment of employee performance in the DOH was significantly and adversely affected by the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of promoting the effectiveness of the DOH as an organization, the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of rewarding deserving employees, and the perception that there were not enough training opportunities in the PMS, in a decreasing order of strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1727-7051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1810-5467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sumy: ТОВ “Консалтингово-видавнича компанія “Ділові перспективи”</publisher><subject>Business Economy / Management ; Economy ; Employee attitude ; Employees ; Government employees ; Health and medicine and law ; logistic regression analysis ; Performance management ; Performance Management System ; productivity ; Regression analysis ; South African Department of Health</subject><ispartof>Problems and perspectives in management, 2017, Vol.15 (2), p.140-147</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2713-ea9c383fda37c1f4c2eb7359d4a0601f51e0f6ec533406683a83cddb7f78eccd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8808-3052</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2221304236?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,11667,25731,27900,27901,27902,36037,36989,44339,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worku, Zeleke</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of satisfactory employee performance in the South African Department of Health</title><title>Problems and perspectives in management</title><addtitle>Problems and Perspectives in Management</addtitle><description>A study was conducted at the South African Department of Health (DOH) in order to assess the perception held by employees of the DOH at national and provincial levels about the suitability of the Performance Management System (PMS) tool that was being used in the DOH for the assessment and evaluation of the performance of employees working for the DOH at national and provincial level based on their Key Performance Areas (KPAs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The study was based on a stratified random sample of size n=120 employees of the DOH working at national and provincial levels. The study was quantitative, and used methods of data analyses such as frequency tables, cross-tab analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. The degree of productivity of employees at work was measured by using a composite index defined by Le Brasseur, Zannibbi Zinger (2013). Results obtained from the study showed that about 74% of employees held a favorable view of the PMS tool that was used for the assessment and evaluation of employees. The percentage of respondents who viewed the PMS tool as unhelpful was about 26%. The study showed that the view held by employees working in the DOH about the relevance and objectivity of the PMS tool used for the assessment of employee performance in the DOH was significantly and adversely affected by the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of promoting the effectiveness of the DOH as an organization, the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of rewarding deserving employees, and the perception that there were not enough training opportunities in the PMS, in a decreasing order of strength.</description><subject>Business Economy / Management</subject><subject>Economy</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Government employees</subject><subject>Health and medicine and law</subject><subject>logistic regression analysis</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Performance Management System</subject><subject>productivity</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>South African Department of Health</subject><issn>1727-7051</issn><issn>1810-5467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU1v2zAMho1iA9q1_QNFDwJ2WQ9ORUqy7GOQrUuBAh3Q7dCTIMvU4sC2PMk55N_XaYL1xA-QD1_izbIb4AsEBXA_jv0C1De8WyAHvQBxll1ACTxXstCf5lyjzjVXcJ59SWnLueSqUhfZ669ITeumEBMLniU7tcnbQ71n1I9d2BOxkaIPsbeDI9YObNoQewm7acOWPrbODuw7jTZOPQ3TAbIm202bq-yzt12i61O8zP48_Pi9WudPzz8fV8un3KEGkZOtnCiFb6zQDrx0SLUWqmqk5QUHr4C4L8gpISQvilLYUrimqbXXJTnXiMvs8chtgt2aMba9jXsTbGveGyH-NbO21nVkqrq2yomGSqxl5X0JBQJKrbmUHp2eWV-PrDGGfztKk9mGXRxm-QYRQXCJopin8DjlYkgpkv9_Fbh5t8PMdhhQBo052GFAzEu3pyWi0H1wC-Tza-INeuCIDQ</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Worku, Zeleke</creator><general>ТОВ “Консалтингово-видавнича компанія “Ділові перспективи”</general><general>LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives”</general><general>Business Perspectives Ltd</general><general>LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-3052</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Predictors of satisfactory employee performance in the South African Department of Health</title><author>Worku, Zeleke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2713-ea9c383fda37c1f4c2eb7359d4a0601f51e0f6ec533406683a83cddb7f78eccd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Business Economy / Management</topic><topic>Economy</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Government employees</topic><topic>Health and medicine and law</topic><topic>logistic regression analysis</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Performance Management System</topic><topic>productivity</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>South African Department of Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worku, Zeleke</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Problems and perspectives in management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worku, Zeleke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of satisfactory employee performance in the South African Department of Health</atitle><jtitle>Problems and perspectives in management</jtitle><addtitle>Problems and Perspectives in Management</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>140-147</pages><issn>1727-7051</issn><eissn>1810-5467</eissn><abstract>A study was conducted at the South African Department of Health (DOH) in order to assess the perception held by employees of the DOH at national and provincial levels about the suitability of the Performance Management System (PMS) tool that was being used in the DOH for the assessment and evaluation of the performance of employees working for the DOH at national and provincial level based on their Key Performance Areas (KPAs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). The study was based on a stratified random sample of size n=120 employees of the DOH working at national and provincial levels. The study was quantitative, and used methods of data analyses such as frequency tables, cross-tab analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. The degree of productivity of employees at work was measured by using a composite index defined by Le Brasseur, Zannibbi Zinger (2013). Results obtained from the study showed that about 74% of employees held a favorable view of the PMS tool that was used for the assessment and evaluation of employees. The percentage of respondents who viewed the PMS tool as unhelpful was about 26%. The study showed that the view held by employees working in the DOH about the relevance and objectivity of the PMS tool used for the assessment of employee performance in the DOH was significantly and adversely affected by the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of promoting the effectiveness of the DOH as an organization, the perception that the PMS policy was incapable of rewarding deserving employees, and the perception that there were not enough training opportunities in the PMS, in a decreasing order of strength.</abstract><cop>Sumy</cop><pub>ТОВ “Консалтингово-видавнича компанія “Ділові перспективи”</pub><doi>10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.13</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-3052</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1727-7051
ispartof Problems and perspectives in management, 2017, Vol.15 (2), p.140-147
issn 1727-7051
1810-5467
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2221304236
source ABI/INFORM global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
subjects Business Economy / Management
Economy
Employee attitude
Employees
Government employees
Health and medicine and law
logistic regression analysis
Performance management
Performance Management System
productivity
Regression analysis
South African Department of Health
title Predictors of satisfactory employee performance in the South African Department of Health
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20satisfactory%20employee%20performance%20in%20the%20South%20African%20Department%20of%20Health&rft.jtitle=Problems%20and%20perspectives%20in%20management&rft.au=Worku,%20Zeleke&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=140-147&rft.issn=1727-7051&rft.eissn=1810-5467&rft_id=info:doi/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.13&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E620533%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2713-ea9c383fda37c1f4c2eb7359d4a0601f51e0f6ec533406683a83cddb7f78eccd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2221304236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=620533&rfr_iscdi=true