Loading…
Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio
Batch co-digestion tests of chicken manure (CM) and sheep manure (SM) at different ratio ( R s/c ) were conducted under mesophilic condition (35 °C). Batch kinetic analysis of bioCH 4 production, excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (DOM), and microbial community...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2019-07, Vol.26 (19), p.19411-19424 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-be7af23ffc7d1178a58fa87a366e71f6794ceb36a80ed485090da8deb92e3f183 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-be7af23ffc7d1178a58fa87a366e71f6794ceb36a80ed485090da8deb92e3f183 |
| container_end_page | 19424 |
| container_issue | 19 |
| container_start_page | 19411 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Song, Liuying Li, Dunjie Fang, Hongli Cao, Xiangyunong Liu, Rutao Niu, Qigui Li, Yu-You |
| description | Batch co-digestion tests of chicken manure (CM) and sheep manure (SM) at different ratio (
R
s/c
) were conducted under mesophilic condition (35 °C). Batch kinetic analysis of bioCH
4
production, excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (DOM), and microbial community were investigated. The well-fitted modified Gompertz model (
R
2
, 0.98–0.99) resulted that the co-digestion markedly improved the methane production rate and shortened the lag phase time. The highest bioCH
4
yield of 219.67 mL/gVS
add
and maximum production rate of 0.378 mL/gVS
add
/h were obtained at an optimum
R
s/c
of 0.4. Additionally, a significant variation of DOM was detected at the
R
s/c
of 0.4 with a consistent degradation of soluble microbial byproduct-like and protein-like organics. The positive synergy effects of co-digestion conspicuously enhanced the bioCH
4
production efficiency. FI
370
and NADH were significantly correlated to
R
s/c
(
p
< 0.05). Moreover, the correlations among process indicator, EEM-peaks and different environmental parameters were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. The high diversity of acetoclastic methanogens and hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the co-digestion improved the stability of process.
Graphical Abstract |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-019-05175-1 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2222336992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222336992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-be7af23ffc7d1178a58fa87a366e71f6794ceb36a80ed485090da8deb92e3f183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAltjW4ImTOF6ilj-pqBKCteU44xuXxL7YCaKvxtPh5rZlhzeWZs58ZzSHkJfA3wDn8m0GEE3LOCjGG5ANg0dkBy3UTNZKPSY7ruqagajrE_Is52vOK64q-ZScCOBSdKLakT9f8ReayYc9XUakNqaEk1l8DDQ62vs44zKagHSPAdPWOKMXV1-om9aYMFsMFs-oCQOdvU2x92YqlHleg19uqA8bdsYcD6OfvC09Nvg95nsLO3r7AwOdTVgTbqA8Ih4eCgsdvHOYMCzF4vdyW9wWeU6eODNlfHH3n5LvH95_O__ELq8-fj5_d8mskGphPUrjKuGclQOA7EzTOdNJI9oWJbhWqtpiL1rTcRzqruGKD6YbsFcVCgedOCWvj9xDij_Xsrm-jmsKxVJX5QnRKlUVVXVUlSPknNDpQ_KzSTcauL6NSx_j0iUuvcWloQy9ukOv_YzDw8h9PkUgjoJcWmGP6Z_3f7B_AVRRpOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2222336992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Song, Liuying ; Li, Dunjie ; Fang, Hongli ; Cao, Xiangyunong ; Liu, Rutao ; Niu, Qigui ; Li, Yu-You</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Liuying ; Li, Dunjie ; Fang, Hongli ; Cao, Xiangyunong ; Liu, Rutao ; Niu, Qigui ; Li, Yu-You</creatorcontrib><description>Batch co-digestion tests of chicken manure (CM) and sheep manure (SM) at different ratio (
R
s/c
) were conducted under mesophilic condition (35 °C). Batch kinetic analysis of bioCH
4
production, excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (DOM), and microbial community were investigated. The well-fitted modified Gompertz model (
R
2
, 0.98–0.99) resulted that the co-digestion markedly improved the methane production rate and shortened the lag phase time. The highest bioCH
4
yield of 219.67 mL/gVS
add
and maximum production rate of 0.378 mL/gVS
add
/h were obtained at an optimum
R
s/c
of 0.4. Additionally, a significant variation of DOM was detected at the
R
s/c
of 0.4 with a consistent degradation of soluble microbial byproduct-like and protein-like organics. The positive synergy effects of co-digestion conspicuously enhanced the bioCH
4
production efficiency. FI
370
and NADH were significantly correlated to
R
s/c
(
p
< 0.05). Moreover, the correlations among process indicator, EEM-peaks and different environmental parameters were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. The high diversity of acetoclastic methanogens and hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the co-digestion improved the stability of process.
Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05175-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31073832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anaerobiosis ; Animals ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Biodegradation ; Biofuels - analysis ; Biogas ; Bioreactors - microbiology ; Chickens ; Communities ; Correlation analysis ; Digestion ; Dissolved organic matter ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Emission analysis ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Fluorescence ; Humic Substances - analysis ; Kinetics ; Lag phase ; Manure - analysis ; Manure - microbiology ; Manures ; Methane - biosynthesis ; Methanogenic bacteria ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota - genetics ; Microorganisms ; NADH ; Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ; Poultry manure ; Research Article ; Sheep ; Sheep manure ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019-07, Vol.26 (19), p.19411-19424</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Environmental Science and Pollution Research is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-be7af23ffc7d1178a58fa87a366e71f6794ceb36a80ed485090da8deb92e3f183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-be7af23ffc7d1178a58fa87a366e71f6794ceb36a80ed485090da8deb92e3f183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0997-8967</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2222336992/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2222336992?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073832$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Liuying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dunjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xiangyunong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Rutao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Qigui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yu-You</creatorcontrib><title>Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Batch co-digestion tests of chicken manure (CM) and sheep manure (SM) at different ratio (
R
s/c
) were conducted under mesophilic condition (35 °C). Batch kinetic analysis of bioCH
4
production, excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (DOM), and microbial community were investigated. The well-fitted modified Gompertz model (
R
2
, 0.98–0.99) resulted that the co-digestion markedly improved the methane production rate and shortened the lag phase time. The highest bioCH
4
yield of 219.67 mL/gVS
add
and maximum production rate of 0.378 mL/gVS
add
/h were obtained at an optimum
R
s/c
of 0.4. Additionally, a significant variation of DOM was detected at the
R
s/c
of 0.4 with a consistent degradation of soluble microbial byproduct-like and protein-like organics. The positive synergy effects of co-digestion conspicuously enhanced the bioCH
4
production efficiency. FI
370
and NADH were significantly correlated to
R
s/c
(
p
< 0.05). Moreover, the correlations among process indicator, EEM-peaks and different environmental parameters were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. The high diversity of acetoclastic methanogens and hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the co-digestion improved the stability of process.
Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biofuels - analysis</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Bioreactors - microbiology</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Dissolved organic matter</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Humic Substances - analysis</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Lag phase</subject><subject>Manure - analysis</subject><subject>Manure - microbiology</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Methane - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Methanogenic bacteria</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota - genetics</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>NADH</subject><subject>Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide</subject><subject>Poultry manure</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep manure</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAltjW4ImTOF6ilj-pqBKCteU44xuXxL7YCaKvxtPh5rZlhzeWZs58ZzSHkJfA3wDn8m0GEE3LOCjGG5ANg0dkBy3UTNZKPSY7ruqagajrE_Is52vOK64q-ZScCOBSdKLakT9f8ReayYc9XUakNqaEk1l8DDQ62vs44zKagHSPAdPWOKMXV1-om9aYMFsMFs-oCQOdvU2x92YqlHleg19uqA8bdsYcD6OfvC09Nvg95nsLO3r7AwOdTVgTbqA8Ih4eCgsdvHOYMCzF4vdyW9wWeU6eODNlfHH3n5LvH95_O__ELq8-fj5_d8mskGphPUrjKuGclQOA7EzTOdNJI9oWJbhWqtpiL1rTcRzqruGKD6YbsFcVCgedOCWvj9xDij_Xsrm-jmsKxVJX5QnRKlUVVXVUlSPknNDpQ_KzSTcauL6NSx_j0iUuvcWloQy9ukOv_YzDw8h9PkUgjoJcWmGP6Z_3f7B_AVRRpOg</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Song, Liuying</creator><creator>Li, Dunjie</creator><creator>Fang, Hongli</creator><creator>Cao, Xiangyunong</creator><creator>Liu, Rutao</creator><creator>Niu, Qigui</creator><creator>Li, Yu-You</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-8967</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio</title><author>Song, Liuying ; Li, Dunjie ; Fang, Hongli ; Cao, Xiangyunong ; Liu, Rutao ; Niu, Qigui ; Li, Yu-You</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-be7af23ffc7d1178a58fa87a366e71f6794ceb36a80ed485090da8deb92e3f183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biofuels - analysis</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Bioreactors - microbiology</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Dissolved organic matter</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Humic Substances - analysis</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Lag phase</topic><topic>Manure - analysis</topic><topic>Manure - microbiology</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Methane - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Methanogenic bacteria</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota - genetics</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>NADH</topic><topic>Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide</topic><topic>Poultry manure</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep manure</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Liuying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dunjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xiangyunong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Rutao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Qigui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yu-You</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Liuying</au><au>Li, Dunjie</au><au>Fang, Hongli</au><au>Cao, Xiangyunong</au><au>Liu, Rutao</au><au>Niu, Qigui</au><au>Li, Yu-You</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>19411</spage><epage>19424</epage><pages>19411-19424</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Batch co-digestion tests of chicken manure (CM) and sheep manure (SM) at different ratio (
R
s/c
) were conducted under mesophilic condition (35 °C). Batch kinetic analysis of bioCH
4
production, excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (DOM), and microbial community were investigated. The well-fitted modified Gompertz model (
R
2
, 0.98–0.99) resulted that the co-digestion markedly improved the methane production rate and shortened the lag phase time. The highest bioCH
4
yield of 219.67 mL/gVS
add
and maximum production rate of 0.378 mL/gVS
add
/h were obtained at an optimum
R
s/c
of 0.4. Additionally, a significant variation of DOM was detected at the
R
s/c
of 0.4 with a consistent degradation of soluble microbial byproduct-like and protein-like organics. The positive synergy effects of co-digestion conspicuously enhanced the bioCH
4
production efficiency. FI
370
and NADH were significantly correlated to
R
s/c
(
p
< 0.05). Moreover, the correlations among process indicator, EEM-peaks and different environmental parameters were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis. The high diversity of acetoclastic methanogens and hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the co-digestion improved the stability of process.
Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31073832</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-019-05175-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-8967</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019-07, Vol.26 (19), p.19411-19424 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2222336992 |
| source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
| subjects | Anaerobiosis Animals Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Biodegradation Biofuels - analysis Biogas Bioreactors - microbiology Chickens Communities Correlation analysis Digestion Dissolved organic matter Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Emission analysis Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Fluorescence Humic Substances - analysis Kinetics Lag phase Manure - analysis Manure - microbiology Manures Methane - biosynthesis Methanogenic bacteria Microbiomes Microbiota - genetics Microorganisms NADH Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide Poultry manure Research Article Sheep Sheep manure Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
| title | Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A16%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revealing%20the%20correlation%20of%20biomethane%20generation,%20DOM%20fluorescence,%20and%20microbial%20community%20in%20the%20mesophilic%20co-digestion%20of%20chicken%20manure%20and%20sheep%20manure%20at%20different%20mixture%20ratio&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Song,%20Liuying&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=19411&rft.epage=19424&rft.pages=19411-19424&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-019-05175-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222336992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-be7af23ffc7d1178a58fa87a366e71f6794ceb36a80ed485090da8deb92e3f183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2222336992&rft_id=info:pmid/31073832&rfr_iscdi=true |