Interspecific interactions, movement patterns and habitat use in a diverse coastal shark assemblage

• Published in: Marine biology 2019-06, Vol.166 (6), p.1-17, Article 68
• Main Authors: Heupel, Michelle R., Munroe, Samantha E. M., Lédée, Elodie J. I., Chin, Andrew, Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustic telemetry; Animal behavior; Animal spatial behavior; Biological competition; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Carcharhinidae; Coastal ecology; Coexistence; Competition; Fishes; Freshwater & Marine Ecology; Habitat selection; Habitat utilization; Habitats; Interactions; Interspecific; Interspecific relationships; Juveniles; Life Sciences; Marine & Freshwater Sciences; Marine biology; Marine ecosystems; Marine fishes; Microbiology; Nursery grounds; Observations; Oceanography; Original Paper; Predation; Predation (Biology); Resources; Sharks; Species; Survival; Telemetry; Tropical climate; Zoological research; Zoology
• ISSN: 0025-3162; 1432-1793
• DOI: 10.1007/s00227-019-3511-7

Sharks are a highly diverse predatory taxon and are regularly found in large, potentially competitive, assemblages. However, the mechanisms that enable long-term coexistence and factors that drive complementary movement are poorly understood. As interspecific interactions can have a large influence on survival and trophic linkages, research on shark assemblages could substantially increase our understanding of marine community dynamics. In this study, we used passive acoustic telemetry to compare the activity space size, spatial overlap and habitat use patterns of six co-occurring shark species from the same family in a tropical nearshore embayment. Our results indicated that all sizes of Rhizoprionodon taylori (a small-bodied, highly productive species) used significantly larger amounts of space (e.g., mean 95% KUD = 85.9 km 2 ) than juveniles of large-bodied, less productive species (e.g., Carcharhinus amboinensis ; 62.3 km 2 ) that use nearshore areas as nursery areas. Most large, less productive species appeared risk averse by using less space, while the smaller more productive species took greater risk by roaming broadly. These movement strategies are likely a means of avoiding predation or gaining access to new or additional resources. Spatial overlap patterns varied substantially between species with overlap in core use areas ranging from 1.2 to 27.6%, but were consistent over time. Most species exhibited low spatial overlap, suggesting spatial partitioning to reduce interspecific competition. While a few species exhibited a high degree of spatial overlap (up to 60% of activity space extent), dietary diversity may reduce competition to support co-occurrence. These data suggest that complex interactions occur in communal nurseries in nearshore waters where species are in direct competition for resources at vulnerable life stages.