Loading…

Microflora Changes With the Use of a Vaginal Microbicide

Background: The rate of HIV transmission is increasing more in women than in any other group. There is an urgent need for the development of microbicides with activity against this virus that women can use during intercourse. These products must be convenient, effective, and safe, and ideally they w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sexually transmitted diseases 2002-05, Vol.29 (5), p.288-293
Main Authors: CLARKE, JENNIFER G., PEIPERT, JEFFREY F., HILLIER, SHARON L., HEBER, WALTER, BOARDMAN, LORI, MOENCH, THOMAS R., MAYER, KENNETH
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The rate of HIV transmission is increasing more in women than in any other group. There is an urgent need for the development of microbicides with activity against this virus that women can use during intercourse. These products must be convenient, effective, and safe, and ideally they will cause minimal disruption in the normal vaginal ecosystem. Goal: The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in vaginal microflora, specifically Lactobacillus species, with the use of BufferGel. Study Design: A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the change in vaginal flora before and after BufferGel use. BufferGel was applied vaginally once or twice daily for 14 days by low-risk abstinent and monogamous women. Results: There was no change in frequency of Lactobacillus species after BufferGel use. However, there was a decrease in H₂O₂-producing lactobacilli (from 4.9 × 10⁷ to 1.1 × 10⁷ cfu; P = 0.001). The proportion of facultative gram-negative rods present increased from 27% to 65% after BufferGel use, whereas obligately anaerobic microbes decreased from 62% to 38%. Conclusion: Use of BufferGel once or twice daily for 14 days resulted in no clinically significant change in Lactobacillus colonization.
ISSN:0148-5717
1537-4521
DOI:10.1097/00007435-200205000-00007