Loading…

Controlling Factors of Seismicity and Geometry in Double Seismic Zones

Double seismic zones are ubiquitous features of subduction zones, where seismicity is distributed along two layers separated by a region with significantly less seismic activity. Dehydration embrittlement is thought to be responsible for earthquakes in the subducting crust (upper layer), but the cas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2019-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4174-4181
Main Authors: Florez, M. A., Prieto, G. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d54958a0710cae3905e6d2885e9ae5a2bce7eb4f3e2b95f606c47eb5ed9d206e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d54958a0710cae3905e6d2885e9ae5a2bce7eb4f3e2b95f606c47eb5ed9d206e3
container_end_page 4181
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4174
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 46
creator Florez, M. A.
Prieto, G. A.
description Double seismic zones are ubiquitous features of subduction zones, where seismicity is distributed along two layers separated by a region with significantly less seismic activity. Dehydration embrittlement is thought to be responsible for earthquakes in the subducting crust (upper layer), but the case for it in the lithospheric mantle (lower layer) is less clear. We apply a recently developed relative relocation technique to characterize seismicity in 32 slab segments. The high‐precision hypocentral depths allow us to assign events to either the upper or lower layer and to separately estimate frequency size distributions for each plane. We find consistently larger b values, correlating with slab age, for the upper layer and roughly constant values for the lower. We also show that thermal parameter and plate age are the key controls on double seismic zone geometry. Our results point to a relatively dry lower layer and suggest a fundamentally different mechanism for lithospheric mantle earthquakes. Plain Language Summary Despite being a common feature of global seismicity, intermediate‐depth earthquakes (70–350 km in depth approximately) and their physical mechanism are not well understood. These earthquakes occur at pressures and temperatures incompatible with our current models of brittle failure. At those depths, most subducting slabs feature two separate layers of seismicity, with little activity in‐between. It is commonly believed that the release of high‐pressure fluids enables the brittle‐like behavior; however, it is not yet clear whether this mechanism can operate on both layers. We have applied a recently developed earthquake location technique to construct a new global catalog of intermediate‐depth seismicity. We use this data set to study the geometrical structure of the two layers and their statistical characteristics. Our results point to a relatively dry lithospheric mantle—lower layer—regardless of plate age, convergence velocity, or composition and suggest that the physical mechanism enabling rupture in the lower layer is fundamentally different from the one in the upper. Key Points Double seismic zone geometrical structure is controlled by plate age and the slab's thermal parameter We find consistently larger b values for the upper seismicity layer, correlating with slab age, and roughly constant values for the lower Our results are consistent with dehydration embrittlement operating in the upper layer but point to a relatively dry lithosphe
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018GL081168
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2224490546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2224490546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d54958a0710cae3905e6d2885e9ae5a2bce7eb4f3e2b95f606c47eb5ed9d206e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rN39AwKvVSZqkyVFWW4WC4MfFS0jbqXTpNmvSRfrvrayCJ08zDA_vwEvIOYMrBtxcc2C6KEEzpvQBWTAjRKIBskOyADDzzjN1TE5iXANACilbkHzlhzH4vu-Gd5q7evQhUt_SZ-zipqu7caJuaGiBfoNjmGg30Fu_q3r8FfTNDxhPyVHr-ohnP3NJXvO7l9V9Uj4WD6ubMnGCAUsaKYzUDjIGtcPUgETVcK0lGofS8arGDCvRpsgrI1sFqhbzQWJjGg4K0yW52Odug__YYRzt2u_CML-0nHMh5kShZnW5V3XwMQZs7TZ0Gxcmy8B-N2X_NjVzvuefXY_Tv9YWT6XUWcbSL81EaRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2224490546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controlling Factors of Seismicity and Geometry in Double Seismic Zones</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Florez, M. A. ; Prieto, G. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Florez, M. A. ; Prieto, G. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Double seismic zones are ubiquitous features of subduction zones, where seismicity is distributed along two layers separated by a region with significantly less seismic activity. Dehydration embrittlement is thought to be responsible for earthquakes in the subducting crust (upper layer), but the case for it in the lithospheric mantle (lower layer) is less clear. We apply a recently developed relative relocation technique to characterize seismicity in 32 slab segments. The high‐precision hypocentral depths allow us to assign events to either the upper or lower layer and to separately estimate frequency size distributions for each plane. We find consistently larger b values, correlating with slab age, for the upper layer and roughly constant values for the lower. We also show that thermal parameter and plate age are the key controls on double seismic zone geometry. Our results point to a relatively dry lower layer and suggest a fundamentally different mechanism for lithospheric mantle earthquakes. Plain Language Summary Despite being a common feature of global seismicity, intermediate‐depth earthquakes (70–350 km in depth approximately) and their physical mechanism are not well understood. These earthquakes occur at pressures and temperatures incompatible with our current models of brittle failure. At those depths, most subducting slabs feature two separate layers of seismicity, with little activity in‐between. It is commonly believed that the release of high‐pressure fluids enables the brittle‐like behavior; however, it is not yet clear whether this mechanism can operate on both layers. We have applied a recently developed earthquake location technique to construct a new global catalog of intermediate‐depth seismicity. We use this data set to study the geometrical structure of the two layers and their statistical characteristics. Our results point to a relatively dry lithospheric mantle—lower layer—regardless of plate age, convergence velocity, or composition and suggest that the physical mechanism enabling rupture in the lower layer is fundamentally different from the one in the upper. Key Points Double seismic zone geometrical structure is controlled by plate age and the slab's thermal parameter We find consistently larger b values for the upper seismicity layer, correlating with slab age, and roughly constant values for the lower Our results are consistent with dehydration embrittlement operating in the upper layer but point to a relatively dry lithospheric mantle</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018GL081168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Brittleness ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Dehydration ; Depth ; Earthquakes ; Embrittlement ; Fluids ; Mantle ; Plates (structural members) ; Relocation ; Seismic activity ; Seismic zones ; Seismicity ; Slabs ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Subduction zones ; Thermodynamic properties</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2019-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4174-4181</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d54958a0710cae3905e6d2885e9ae5a2bce7eb4f3e2b95f606c47eb5ed9d206e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d54958a0710cae3905e6d2885e9ae5a2bce7eb4f3e2b95f606c47eb5ed9d206e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1034-2082 ; 0000-0001-8538-7379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018GL081168$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018GL081168$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Florez, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, G. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Controlling Factors of Seismicity and Geometry in Double Seismic Zones</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Double seismic zones are ubiquitous features of subduction zones, where seismicity is distributed along two layers separated by a region with significantly less seismic activity. Dehydration embrittlement is thought to be responsible for earthquakes in the subducting crust (upper layer), but the case for it in the lithospheric mantle (lower layer) is less clear. We apply a recently developed relative relocation technique to characterize seismicity in 32 slab segments. The high‐precision hypocentral depths allow us to assign events to either the upper or lower layer and to separately estimate frequency size distributions for each plane. We find consistently larger b values, correlating with slab age, for the upper layer and roughly constant values for the lower. We also show that thermal parameter and plate age are the key controls on double seismic zone geometry. Our results point to a relatively dry lower layer and suggest a fundamentally different mechanism for lithospheric mantle earthquakes. Plain Language Summary Despite being a common feature of global seismicity, intermediate‐depth earthquakes (70–350 km in depth approximately) and their physical mechanism are not well understood. These earthquakes occur at pressures and temperatures incompatible with our current models of brittle failure. At those depths, most subducting slabs feature two separate layers of seismicity, with little activity in‐between. It is commonly believed that the release of high‐pressure fluids enables the brittle‐like behavior; however, it is not yet clear whether this mechanism can operate on both layers. We have applied a recently developed earthquake location technique to construct a new global catalog of intermediate‐depth seismicity. We use this data set to study the geometrical structure of the two layers and their statistical characteristics. Our results point to a relatively dry lithospheric mantle—lower layer—regardless of plate age, convergence velocity, or composition and suggest that the physical mechanism enabling rupture in the lower layer is fundamentally different from the one in the upper. Key Points Double seismic zone geometrical structure is controlled by plate age and the slab's thermal parameter We find consistently larger b values for the upper seismicity layer, correlating with slab age, and roughly constant values for the lower Our results are consistent with dehydration embrittlement operating in the upper layer but point to a relatively dry lithospheric mantle</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Dehydration</subject><subject>Depth</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Embrittlement</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Mantle</subject><subject>Plates (structural members)</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic zones</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Slabs</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>Thermodynamic properties</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rN39AwKvVSZqkyVFWW4WC4MfFS0jbqXTpNmvSRfrvrayCJ08zDA_vwEvIOYMrBtxcc2C6KEEzpvQBWTAjRKIBskOyADDzzjN1TE5iXANACilbkHzlhzH4vu-Gd5q7evQhUt_SZ-zipqu7caJuaGiBfoNjmGg30Fu_q3r8FfTNDxhPyVHr-ohnP3NJXvO7l9V9Uj4WD6ubMnGCAUsaKYzUDjIGtcPUgETVcK0lGofS8arGDCvRpsgrI1sFqhbzQWJjGg4K0yW52Odug__YYRzt2u_CML-0nHMh5kShZnW5V3XwMQZs7TZ0Gxcmy8B-N2X_NjVzvuefXY_Tv9YWT6XUWcbSL81EaRQ</recordid><startdate>20190428</startdate><enddate>20190428</enddate><creator>Florez, M. A.</creator><creator>Prieto, G. A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-2082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-7379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190428</creationdate><title>Controlling Factors of Seismicity and Geometry in Double Seismic Zones</title><author>Florez, M. A. ; Prieto, G. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d54958a0710cae3905e6d2885e9ae5a2bce7eb4f3e2b95f606c47eb5ed9d206e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Dehydration</topic><topic>Depth</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Embrittlement</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Mantle</topic><topic>Plates (structural members)</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic zones</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Slabs</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>Thermodynamic properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Florez, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, G. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Florez, M. A.</au><au>Prieto, G. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controlling Factors of Seismicity and Geometry in Double Seismic Zones</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2019-04-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4174</spage><epage>4181</epage><pages>4174-4181</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Double seismic zones are ubiquitous features of subduction zones, where seismicity is distributed along two layers separated by a region with significantly less seismic activity. Dehydration embrittlement is thought to be responsible for earthquakes in the subducting crust (upper layer), but the case for it in the lithospheric mantle (lower layer) is less clear. We apply a recently developed relative relocation technique to characterize seismicity in 32 slab segments. The high‐precision hypocentral depths allow us to assign events to either the upper or lower layer and to separately estimate frequency size distributions for each plane. We find consistently larger b values, correlating with slab age, for the upper layer and roughly constant values for the lower. We also show that thermal parameter and plate age are the key controls on double seismic zone geometry. Our results point to a relatively dry lower layer and suggest a fundamentally different mechanism for lithospheric mantle earthquakes. Plain Language Summary Despite being a common feature of global seismicity, intermediate‐depth earthquakes (70–350 km in depth approximately) and their physical mechanism are not well understood. These earthquakes occur at pressures and temperatures incompatible with our current models of brittle failure. At those depths, most subducting slabs feature two separate layers of seismicity, with little activity in‐between. It is commonly believed that the release of high‐pressure fluids enables the brittle‐like behavior; however, it is not yet clear whether this mechanism can operate on both layers. We have applied a recently developed earthquake location technique to construct a new global catalog of intermediate‐depth seismicity. We use this data set to study the geometrical structure of the two layers and their statistical characteristics. Our results point to a relatively dry lithospheric mantle—lower layer—regardless of plate age, convergence velocity, or composition and suggest that the physical mechanism enabling rupture in the lower layer is fundamentally different from the one in the upper. Key Points Double seismic zone geometrical structure is controlled by plate age and the slab's thermal parameter We find consistently larger b values for the upper seismicity layer, correlating with slab age, and roughly constant values for the lower Our results are consistent with dehydration embrittlement operating in the upper layer but point to a relatively dry lithospheric mantle</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018GL081168</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-2082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-7379</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2019-04, Vol.46 (8), p.4174-4181
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2224490546
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive
subjects Age
Brittleness
Computational fluid dynamics
Dehydration
Depth
Earthquakes
Embrittlement
Fluids
Mantle
Plates (structural members)
Relocation
Seismic activity
Seismic zones
Seismicity
Slabs
Subduction
Subduction (geology)
Subduction zones
Thermodynamic properties
title Controlling Factors of Seismicity and Geometry in Double Seismic Zones
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A54%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controlling%20Factors%20of%20Seismicity%20and%20Geometry%20in%20Double%20Seismic%20Zones&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Florez,%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2019-04-28&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4174&rft.epage=4181&rft.pages=4174-4181&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018GL081168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2224490546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4101-d54958a0710cae3905e6d2885e9ae5a2bce7eb4f3e2b95f606c47eb5ed9d206e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2224490546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true