Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?

• Published in: Cities 2019-06, Vol.89, p.141-153
• Main Authors: Huovila, Aapo, Bosch, Peter, Airaksinen, Miimu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: City managers; Classification; Communications technology; Comparative analysis; Decision making; Evaluation; Implementation; Information technology; Monitoring; Policy making; Smart cities; Smart sustainable cities; Standardization; Sustainability; Sustainable Development Goals; Transportation; Urban indicator
• ISSN: 0264-2751; 1873-6084
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029

City managers need indicators for target setting, performance assessment, monitoring, management and decision-making purposes. The choice of the most suitable indicator framework is crucial, but difficult, as it requires expert knowledge. To help cities in their choice, this paper compares seven recently published indicator standards for Smart sustainable cities. A taxonomy was developed to evaluate each of their 413 indicators against five conceptual urban focuses (types of urban sustainability and smartness), ten sectoral application domains (energy, transport, ICT, economy, etc.) and five indicator types (input, process, output, outcome, impact). The results clearly discriminate between indicator standards suited for evaluating the implementation of predominantly smart city approaches versus standards more focused on sustainability assessment. A further distinction is possible in standards almost fully oriented towards impacts reached, and standards that allow for progress evaluation according to steps in the implementation process. Some standards provide a narrow focus on output indicators evaluating the progress in implementing smart urban ICT solutions (e.g. number of smart meters installed). Cities are encouraged to complement such evaluations with impact indicators that demonstrate the effects of those solutions. This paper provides guidance for city managers and policy makers to select the indicators and standard that best correspond to their assessment need and goals, and align with their stage in Smart sustainable city implementation. [Display omitted] •7 city indicator standards (413 indicators) analyzed and compared•Clear differences in focus on sustainability or smartness and the role of ICT•Some standards focus on short-term evaluation of efficiency in smart city deployment.•Others allow evaluation of progress in steps, and achieved (sustainability) impacts.•Guidance for choice of an indicator standard that best suits your goal and need