Loading…

Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", &qu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrition and cancer 2019-08, Vol.71 (6), p.898-907
Main Authors: Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro, Barros, Thalita Alves de, Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa, Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133
container_end_page 907
container_issue 6
container_start_page 898
container_title Nutrition and cancer
container_volume 71
creator Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro
Barros, Thalita Alves de
Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa
Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro
description The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2230254966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2216773528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIly9iO7YQT1QoKUlUQbeFoeZ0xcpXExU5a7dvjaLc9cOA0mtE3M_o_Ql4zWDNo4D0wJaRs2JoDa9dMthJq-YysmBS80i2rn5PVwlQLdExOcr4FAM1E84IcCwZCiLpZkV-X85TCFOJoe3rlEuIYxt_0OsY-05uMHbVjR3_aPnR2Kp2PiW7s6DDR73YKOE75Az2jV7s84VAGjv7A-4APL8mRt33GV4d6Sm4-f7refKkuvp1_3ZxdVK5WMFVNq7xEcJqBQo7eYSc8NFhrvwXNnVZb1nK02tdcgfZSade2rKulk00JI07Ju_3duxT_zJgnM4TssO_tiHHOhnOmtBaSNwV9-w96G-dUci-UAC7rVqlCyT3lUsw5oTd3KQw27QwDs5g3j-bNYt4czJe9N4fr83bA7mnrUXUBPu6BMBaJg32Iqe_MZHd9TD4VpSEv8P9-_AUK55Ci</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2230254966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro ; Barros, Thalita Alves de ; Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa ; Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro ; Barros, Thalita Alves de ; Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa ; Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-5581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31033348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Health and safety screening ; Neoplasms ; Nutrition ; Nutrition assessment ; Object recognition ; Sensitivity analysis ; Systematic review ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Nutrition and cancer, 2019-08, Vol.71 (6), p.898-907</ispartof><rights>2019 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2019</rights><rights>2019 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0493-384X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Thalita Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creatorcontrib><title>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</title><title>Nutrition and cancer</title><addtitle>Nutr Cancer</addtitle><description>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Health and safety screening</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition assessment</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0163-5581</issn><issn>1532-7914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIly9iO7YQT1QoKUlUQbeFoeZ0xcpXExU5a7dvjaLc9cOA0mtE3M_o_Ql4zWDNo4D0wJaRs2JoDa9dMthJq-YysmBS80i2rn5PVwlQLdExOcr4FAM1E84IcCwZCiLpZkV-X85TCFOJoe3rlEuIYxt_0OsY-05uMHbVjR3_aPnR2Kp2PiW7s6DDR73YKOE75Az2jV7s84VAGjv7A-4APL8mRt33GV4d6Sm4-f7refKkuvp1_3ZxdVK5WMFVNq7xEcJqBQo7eYSc8NFhrvwXNnVZb1nK02tdcgfZSade2rKulk00JI07Ju_3duxT_zJgnM4TssO_tiHHOhnOmtBaSNwV9-w96G-dUci-UAC7rVqlCyT3lUsw5oTd3KQw27QwDs5g3j-bNYt4czJe9N4fr83bA7mnrUXUBPu6BMBaJg32Iqe_MZHd9TD4VpSEv8P9-_AUK55Ci</recordid><startdate>20190818</startdate><enddate>20190818</enddate><creator>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</creator><creator>Barros, Thalita Alves de</creator><creator>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</creator><creator>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-384X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190818</creationdate><title>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</title><author>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro ; Barros, Thalita Alves de ; Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa ; Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Health and safety screening</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition assessment</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Thalita Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition and cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</au><au>Barros, Thalita Alves de</au><au>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</au><au>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition and cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Cancer</addtitle><date>2019-08-18</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>898</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>898-907</pages><issn>0163-5581</issn><eissn>1532-7914</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>31033348</pmid><doi>10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-384X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-5581
ispartof Nutrition and cancer, 2019-08, Vol.71 (6), p.898-907
issn 0163-5581
1532-7914
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2230254966
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Cancer
Health and safety screening
Neoplasms
Nutrition
Nutrition assessment
Object recognition
Sensitivity analysis
Systematic review
Validation studies
title Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutritional%20Screening%20Tools%20Used%20and%20Validated%20for%20Cancer%20Patients:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20and%20cancer&rft.au=Mendes,%20N%C3%A9lia%20Pinheiro&rft.date=2019-08-18&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=898&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=898-907&rft.issn=0163-5581&rft.eissn=1532-7914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2216773528%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2230254966&rft_id=info:pmid/31033348&rfr_iscdi=true