Loading…
Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", &qu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nutrition and cancer 2019-08, Vol.71 (6), p.898-907 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133 |
container_end_page | 907 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 898 |
container_title | Nutrition and cancer |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro Barros, Thalita Alves de Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro |
description | The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2230254966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2216773528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIly9iO7YQT1QoKUlUQbeFoeZ0xcpXExU5a7dvjaLc9cOA0mtE3M_o_Ql4zWDNo4D0wJaRs2JoDa9dMthJq-YysmBS80i2rn5PVwlQLdExOcr4FAM1E84IcCwZCiLpZkV-X85TCFOJoe3rlEuIYxt_0OsY-05uMHbVjR3_aPnR2Kp2PiW7s6DDR73YKOE75Az2jV7s84VAGjv7A-4APL8mRt33GV4d6Sm4-f7refKkuvp1_3ZxdVK5WMFVNq7xEcJqBQo7eYSc8NFhrvwXNnVZb1nK02tdcgfZSade2rKulk00JI07Ju_3duxT_zJgnM4TssO_tiHHOhnOmtBaSNwV9-w96G-dUci-UAC7rVqlCyT3lUsw5oTd3KQw27QwDs5g3j-bNYt4czJe9N4fr83bA7mnrUXUBPu6BMBaJg32Iqe_MZHd9TD4VpSEv8P9-_AUK55Ci</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2230254966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro ; Barros, Thalita Alves de ; Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa ; Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro ; Barros, Thalita Alves de ; Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa ; Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-5581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31033348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Health and safety screening ; Neoplasms ; Nutrition ; Nutrition assessment ; Object recognition ; Sensitivity analysis ; Systematic review ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Nutrition and cancer, 2019-08, Vol.71 (6), p.898-907</ispartof><rights>2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2019</rights><rights>2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0493-384X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Thalita Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creatorcontrib><title>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</title><title>Nutrition and cancer</title><addtitle>Nutr Cancer</addtitle><description>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Health and safety screening</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition assessment</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0163-5581</issn><issn>1532-7914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi1ERbeFRwBZ4sIly9iO7YQT1QoKUlUQbeFoeZ0xcpXExU5a7dvjaLc9cOA0mtE3M_o_Ql4zWDNo4D0wJaRs2JoDa9dMthJq-YysmBS80i2rn5PVwlQLdExOcr4FAM1E84IcCwZCiLpZkV-X85TCFOJoe3rlEuIYxt_0OsY-05uMHbVjR3_aPnR2Kp2PiW7s6DDR73YKOE75Az2jV7s84VAGjv7A-4APL8mRt33GV4d6Sm4-f7refKkuvp1_3ZxdVK5WMFVNq7xEcJqBQo7eYSc8NFhrvwXNnVZb1nK02tdcgfZSade2rKulk00JI07Ju_3duxT_zJgnM4TssO_tiHHOhnOmtBaSNwV9-w96G-dUci-UAC7rVqlCyT3lUsw5oTd3KQw27QwDs5g3j-bNYt4czJe9N4fr83bA7mnrUXUBPu6BMBaJg32Iqe_MZHd9TD4VpSEv8P9-_AUK55Ci</recordid><startdate>20190818</startdate><enddate>20190818</enddate><creator>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</creator><creator>Barros, Thalita Alves de</creator><creator>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</creator><creator>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-384X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190818</creationdate><title>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</title><author>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro ; Barros, Thalita Alves de ; Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa ; Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Health and safety screening</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition assessment</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Thalita Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition and cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendes, Nélia Pinheiro</au><au>Barros, Thalita Alves de</au><au>Rosa, Carla de Oliveira Barbosa</au><au>Franceschini, Sylvia do Carmo Castro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition and cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Cancer</addtitle><date>2019-08-18</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>898</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>898-907</pages><issn>0163-5581</issn><eissn>1532-7914</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify validated nutritional screening tools for cancer patients. The research was conducted in the electronic databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), using the descriptors "Nutrition Assessment", "Neoplasms", and "Validation studies". Initially, we identified 168 articles. After assessing eligibility, we included 21 studies. In selected studies, 14 nutritional screening tools were validation objects. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) showed better sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values (98, 82, 95, and 93%, respectively), as well as predictive of overall survival in cancer patients. In many countries, in addition to PG-SGA, the Nutrition Risk Screen (NRS-2002) is recommended for these patients. We did not identify, however, manuscripts that proposed validation. Validation studies of nutritional screening tools should be performed on patients with cancer, using representative samples of these individuals for better reliability of their results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>31033348</pmid><doi>10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-384X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-5581 |
ispartof | Nutrition and cancer, 2019-08, Vol.71 (6), p.898-907 |
issn | 0163-5581 1532-7914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2230254966 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Cancer Health and safety screening Neoplasms Nutrition Nutrition assessment Object recognition Sensitivity analysis Systematic review Validation studies |
title | Nutritional Screening Tools Used and Validated for Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutritional%20Screening%20Tools%20Used%20and%20Validated%20for%20Cancer%20Patients:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20and%20cancer&rft.au=Mendes,%20N%C3%A9lia%20Pinheiro&rft.date=2019-08-18&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=898&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=898-907&rft.issn=0163-5581&rft.eissn=1532-7914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01635581.2019.1595045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2216773528%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-896f5e0c7106e2efced3f08e47fb072c76b192ea7f42607f567c991d45c587133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2230254966&rft_id=info:pmid/31033348&rfr_iscdi=true |