Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning

The paper provides a concise review of evaluation methods for decision problems in which qualitative data is involved. Special attention is paid to a new qualitative evaluation method: the regime method. An application of the regime method is given in the field of multiregional conflict analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Regional science and urban economics 1983-02, Vol.13 (1), p.77-102
Main Authors: Hinloopen, Edwin, Nijkamp, Peter, Rietveld, Piet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Criteria
Decision making
Methods
Multiple
Qualitative
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d7521d25b5e480fc3ef0be0a63892306a97a86934a4363be018fb72a33ce20333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d7521d25b5e480fc3ef0be0a63892306a97a86934a4363be018fb72a33ce20333
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title Regional science and urban economics
container_volume 13
creator Hinloopen, Edwin
Nijkamp, Peter
Rietveld, Piet
description The paper provides a concise review of evaluation methods for decision problems in which qualitative data is involved. Special attention is paid to a new qualitative evaluation method: the regime method. An application of the regime method is given in the field of multiregional conflict analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0166-0462(83)90006-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_223084762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0166046283900066</els_id><sourcerecordid>1292151043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d7521d25b5e480fc3ef0be0a63892306a97a86934a4363be018fb72a33ce20333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoPPBS96KGajzZNL4IsfiwsiKDnkE1fd7N0m5qkC_vvTa3sTQ8vGXgzw7xB6JLgO4IJv4_DU5xxeiPYbYkx5ik_QhMiijKlDItjNDlQTtGZ95vIIZyyCZq_96oxQQWzg6QyXjsIkGz7JpiugUQ7E8AZlei1NToubAWNT0ybOFgZ26om6RrVtqZdnaOTWjUeLn7_Kfp8fvqYvaaLt5f57HGR6hzTkFZFTklF82UOmcC1ZlDjJWDFmShjVq7KQgleskxljLO4IaJeFlQxpoFixtgUXY2-nbNfPfggN7Z3MYmXdDg2K-JhU3T9F4nQkpKc4GywykaWdtZ7B7XsnNkqt5cEy6FZOdQmh9qkYPKnWcmjbD7KHHSgDxoAiKWAtnInmSIsPvsBlGKAZoBxujhFEd2pXIdt9HoYvWKtsDPgpNcGWg2VcaCDrKz5P8w38j6W0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292151043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier SD Backfile Economics</source><creator>Hinloopen, Edwin ; Nijkamp, Peter ; Rietveld, Piet</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinloopen, Edwin ; Nijkamp, Peter ; Rietveld, Piet</creatorcontrib><description>The paper provides a concise review of evaluation methods for decision problems in which qualitative data is involved. Special attention is paid to a new qualitative evaluation method: the regime method. An application of the regime method is given in the field of multiregional conflict analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-0462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0166-0462(83)90006-6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RGUEA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Methods ; Multiple ; Qualitative</subject><ispartof>Regional science and urban economics, 1983-02, Vol.13 (1), p.77-102</ispartof><rights>1983</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Feb 1983</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d7521d25b5e480fc3ef0be0a63892306a97a86934a4363be018fb72a33ce20333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d7521d25b5e480fc3ef0be0a63892306a97a86934a4363be018fb72a33ce20333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0166046283900066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3460,27924,27925,33223,45992</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeregeco/v_3a13_3ay_3a1983_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a77-102.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinloopen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkamp, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietveld, Piet</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning</title><title>Regional science and urban economics</title><description>The paper provides a concise review of evaluation methods for decision problems in which qualitative data is involved. Special attention is paid to a new qualitative evaluation method: the regime method. An application of the regime method is given in the field of multiregional conflict analysis.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple</subject><subject>Qualitative</subject><issn>0166-0462</issn><issn>1879-2308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoPPBS96KGajzZNL4IsfiwsiKDnkE1fd7N0m5qkC_vvTa3sTQ8vGXgzw7xB6JLgO4IJv4_DU5xxeiPYbYkx5ik_QhMiijKlDItjNDlQTtGZ95vIIZyyCZq_96oxQQWzg6QyXjsIkGz7JpiugUQ7E8AZlei1NToubAWNT0ybOFgZ26om6RrVtqZdnaOTWjUeLn7_Kfp8fvqYvaaLt5f57HGR6hzTkFZFTklF82UOmcC1ZlDjJWDFmShjVq7KQgleskxljLO4IaJeFlQxpoFixtgUXY2-nbNfPfggN7Z3MYmXdDg2K-JhU3T9F4nQkpKc4GywykaWdtZ7B7XsnNkqt5cEy6FZOdQmh9qkYPKnWcmjbD7KHHSgDxoAiKWAtnInmSIsPvsBlGKAZoBxujhFEd2pXIdt9HoYvWKtsDPgpNcGWg2VcaCDrKz5P8w38j6W0A</recordid><startdate>19830201</startdate><enddate>19830201</enddate><creator>Hinloopen, Edwin</creator><creator>Nijkamp, Peter</creator><creator>Rietveld, Piet</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North-Holland</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830201</creationdate><title>Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning</title><author>Hinloopen, Edwin ; Nijkamp, Peter ; Rietveld, Piet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d7521d25b5e480fc3ef0be0a63892306a97a86934a4363be018fb72a33ce20333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple</topic><topic>Qualitative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinloopen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijkamp, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rietveld, Piet</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinloopen, Edwin</au><au>Nijkamp, Peter</au><au>Rietveld, Piet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning</atitle><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle><date>1983-02-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>77-102</pages><issn>0166-0462</issn><eissn>1879-2308</eissn><coden>RGUEA3</coden><abstract>The paper provides a concise review of evaluation methods for decision problems in which qualitative data is involved. Special attention is paid to a new qualitative evaluation method: the regime method. An application of the regime method is given in the field of multiregional conflict analysis.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0166-0462(83)90006-6</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-0462
ispartof Regional science and urban economics, 1983-02, Vol.13 (1), p.77-102
issn 0166-0462
1879-2308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_223084762
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier SD Backfile Economics
subjects Analysis
Criteria
Decision making
Methods
Multiple
Qualitative
title Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20discrete%20multiple%20criteria%20choice%20models%20in%20regional%20planning&rft.jtitle=Regional%20science%20and%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Hinloopen,%20Edwin&rft.date=1983-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=77-102&rft.issn=0166-0462&rft.eissn=1879-2308&rft.coden=RGUEA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0166-0462(83)90006-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1292151043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d7521d25b5e480fc3ef0be0a63892306a97a86934a4363be018fb72a33ce20333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292151043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true