Loading…
Effect of Intercropping and Cutting Date for Guar on Soybean Yield
Two field trials were conducted at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University at Assiut Governorate, Egypt, during the summer of 2014 and 2015 seasons to study the effect of four patterns intercropping and three time cutting. Soybean as main crop with guar as secondary crop b...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of agriculture and economic development 2017-12, Vol.5 (2), p.82-102 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 102 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | International journal of agriculture and economic development |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Mahdy, A Y El-Said, M A A |
description | Two field trials were conducted at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University at Assiut Governorate, Egypt, during the summer of 2014 and 2015 seasons to study the effect of four patterns intercropping and three time cutting. Soybean as main crop with guar as secondary crop beside solid planting of each crop on yield and its components, as well as chemical contents of both crops in addition to competitive relations and the economic return . Pattern of (P9) significantly increased plant height of soybean as compared with pure stand and other intercropping patterns. The intercropping pattern of (P2) soybean produced the greatest values of No. of bonds/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield/plant and seed yield/fed. while seed yield/fed. hat the minimum reduction at (P9) pattern. The pure stands of the guar plants produced the maximum forage yield/fed Ton. as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. Meanwhile, growing guar under the intercropping pattern of (P9) produced the highest values of forage yield/fed. as compared with the other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The protein ratio/plant grown soybean under intercropping pattern of (P11) produced the maximum as compared with all the other intercropping patterns Meanwhile, growing soybean under the intercropping pattern of (P2) produced the highest value oil ratio seeds/plant. The intercropping patterns of (P9) of guar produced the greatest values of the protein ratio/plant and total ash/plant as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The highest value of crude fibers for the guar crop was (P10) intercropping pattern. Intercropping pattern (P11) was the best for land utilization from land equivalent ratio (LER) and relative crowding coefficient (RCC). Soybean (dominant) and guar had the lowest values for aggressivity. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2231405890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2231405890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22314058903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirsKwjAUQIMoWLT_cMG5cJNYbFdrfcy6OJXYJtJSkpjH4N-roLvTOXDOhCSMc5ohQ5z-nJabOUm9HxCR5qxgjCZkWysl2wBGwUkH6VpnrO31HYTuoIohfHwnggRlHByicGA0nM3zJoWGay_HbklmSoxepl8uyGpfX6pjZp15ROlDM5jo9Ds1jHG6xrwokf93vQChvjqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2231405890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Intercropping and Cutting Date for Guar on Soybean Yield</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><creator>Mahdy, A Y ; El-Said, M A A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahdy, A Y ; El-Said, M A A</creatorcontrib><description>Two field trials were conducted at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University at Assiut Governorate, Egypt, during the summer of 2014 and 2015 seasons to study the effect of four patterns intercropping and three time cutting. Soybean as main crop with guar as secondary crop beside solid planting of each crop on yield and its components, as well as chemical contents of both crops in addition to competitive relations and the economic return . Pattern of (P9) significantly increased plant height of soybean as compared with pure stand and other intercropping patterns. The intercropping pattern of (P2) soybean produced the greatest values of No. of bonds/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield/plant and seed yield/fed. while seed yield/fed. hat the minimum reduction at (P9) pattern. The pure stands of the guar plants produced the maximum forage yield/fed Ton. as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. Meanwhile, growing guar under the intercropping pattern of (P9) produced the highest values of forage yield/fed. as compared with the other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The protein ratio/plant grown soybean under intercropping pattern of (P11) produced the maximum as compared with all the other intercropping patterns Meanwhile, growing soybean under the intercropping pattern of (P2) produced the highest value oil ratio seeds/plant. The intercropping patterns of (P9) of guar produced the greatest values of the protein ratio/plant and total ash/plant as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The highest value of crude fibers for the guar crop was (P10) intercropping pattern. Intercropping pattern (P11) was the best for land utilization from land equivalent ratio (LER) and relative crowding coefficient (RCC). Soybean (dominant) and guar had the lowest values for aggressivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-0197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-0200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beverly Hills: Global Strategic Management Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Competition ; Corn ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Cutting ; Experimental farms ; Experiments ; Farms ; Fertilizers ; Intercropping ; Land use ; Organic chemistry ; Proteins ; Seasons ; Seeds ; Sorghum ; Soybeans ; Split-plot design ; Statistical analysis ; Summer</subject><ispartof>International journal of agriculture and economic development, 2017-12, Vol.5 (2), p.82-102</ispartof><rights>Copyright Global Strategic Management Inc Dec 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2231405890/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2231405890?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahdy, A Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Said, M A A</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Intercropping and Cutting Date for Guar on Soybean Yield</title><title>International journal of agriculture and economic development</title><description>Two field trials were conducted at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University at Assiut Governorate, Egypt, during the summer of 2014 and 2015 seasons to study the effect of four patterns intercropping and three time cutting. Soybean as main crop with guar as secondary crop beside solid planting of each crop on yield and its components, as well as chemical contents of both crops in addition to competitive relations and the economic return . Pattern of (P9) significantly increased plant height of soybean as compared with pure stand and other intercropping patterns. The intercropping pattern of (P2) soybean produced the greatest values of No. of bonds/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield/plant and seed yield/fed. while seed yield/fed. hat the minimum reduction at (P9) pattern. The pure stands of the guar plants produced the maximum forage yield/fed Ton. as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. Meanwhile, growing guar under the intercropping pattern of (P9) produced the highest values of forage yield/fed. as compared with the other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The protein ratio/plant grown soybean under intercropping pattern of (P11) produced the maximum as compared with all the other intercropping patterns Meanwhile, growing soybean under the intercropping pattern of (P2) produced the highest value oil ratio seeds/plant. The intercropping patterns of (P9) of guar produced the greatest values of the protein ratio/plant and total ash/plant as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The highest value of crude fibers for the guar crop was (P10) intercropping pattern. Intercropping pattern (P11) was the best for land utilization from land equivalent ratio (LER) and relative crowding coefficient (RCC). Soybean (dominant) and guar had the lowest values for aggressivity.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cutting</subject><subject>Experimental farms</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Intercropping</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Split-plot design</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Summer</subject><issn>2331-0197</issn><issn>2331-0200</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirsKwjAUQIMoWLT_cMG5cJNYbFdrfcy6OJXYJtJSkpjH4N-roLvTOXDOhCSMc5ohQ5z-nJabOUm9HxCR5qxgjCZkWysl2wBGwUkH6VpnrO31HYTuoIohfHwnggRlHByicGA0nM3zJoWGay_HbklmSoxepl8uyGpfX6pjZp15ROlDM5jo9Ds1jHG6xrwokf93vQChvjqY</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Mahdy, A Y</creator><creator>El-Said, M A A</creator><general>Global Strategic Management Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Effect of Intercropping and Cutting Date for Guar on Soybean Yield</title><author>Mahdy, A Y ; El-Said, M A A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22314058903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cutting</topic><topic>Experimental farms</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Intercropping</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Split-plot design</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Summer</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahdy, A Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Said, M A A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of agriculture and economic development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahdy, A Y</au><au>El-Said, M A A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Intercropping and Cutting Date for Guar on Soybean Yield</atitle><jtitle>International journal of agriculture and economic development</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>82-102</pages><issn>2331-0197</issn><eissn>2331-0200</eissn><abstract>Two field trials were conducted at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University at Assiut Governorate, Egypt, during the summer of 2014 and 2015 seasons to study the effect of four patterns intercropping and three time cutting. Soybean as main crop with guar as secondary crop beside solid planting of each crop on yield and its components, as well as chemical contents of both crops in addition to competitive relations and the economic return . Pattern of (P9) significantly increased plant height of soybean as compared with pure stand and other intercropping patterns. The intercropping pattern of (P2) soybean produced the greatest values of No. of bonds/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield/plant and seed yield/fed. while seed yield/fed. hat the minimum reduction at (P9) pattern. The pure stands of the guar plants produced the maximum forage yield/fed Ton. as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. Meanwhile, growing guar under the intercropping pattern of (P9) produced the highest values of forage yield/fed. as compared with the other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The protein ratio/plant grown soybean under intercropping pattern of (P11) produced the maximum as compared with all the other intercropping patterns Meanwhile, growing soybean under the intercropping pattern of (P2) produced the highest value oil ratio seeds/plant. The intercropping patterns of (P9) of guar produced the greatest values of the protein ratio/plant and total ash/plant as compared with other intercropping patterns in both seasons. The highest value of crude fibers for the guar crop was (P10) intercropping pattern. Intercropping pattern (P11) was the best for land utilization from land equivalent ratio (LER) and relative crowding coefficient (RCC). Soybean (dominant) and guar had the lowest values for aggressivity.</abstract><cop>Beverly Hills</cop><pub>Global Strategic Management Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2331-0197 |
ispartof | International journal of agriculture and economic development, 2017-12, Vol.5 (2), p.82-102 |
issn | 2331-0197 2331-0200 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2231405890 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest) |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agricultural production Agriculture Competition Corn Crop yield Crops Cutting Experimental farms Experiments Farms Fertilizers Intercropping Land use Organic chemistry Proteins Seasons Seeds Sorghum Soybeans Split-plot design Statistical analysis Summer |
title | Effect of Intercropping and Cutting Date for Guar on Soybean Yield |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A11%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Intercropping%20and%20Cutting%20Date%20for%20Guar%20on%20Soybean%20Yield&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20agriculture%20and%20economic%20development&rft.au=Mahdy,%20A%20Y&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=82-102&rft.issn=2331-0197&rft.eissn=2331-0200&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2231405890%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22314058903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2231405890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |