Loading…

Knowledge and Sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the Wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court

With Justice Kavanaugh joining the U.S. Supreme Court, there is speculation that Roe v. Wade may be overturned. For decades, public opinion polls have asked people how they feel about overturning Roe v. Wade . However, people may be uninformed about Roe v. Wade and the implications of overturning th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sexuality research & social policy 2020-06, Vol.17 (2), p.285-300
Main Authors: Jozkowski, Kristen N., Crawford, Brandon L., Turner, Ronna C., Lo, Wen-Juo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-256497a12f0a8877a67e1a209d5866ddb3cc5729097c67cae252e2169fb14f6e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-256497a12f0a8877a67e1a209d5866ddb3cc5729097c67cae252e2169fb14f6e3
container_end_page 300
container_issue 2
container_start_page 285
container_title Sexuality research & social policy
container_volume 17
creator Jozkowski, Kristen N.
Crawford, Brandon L.
Turner, Ronna C.
Lo, Wen-Juo
description With Justice Kavanaugh joining the U.S. Supreme Court, there is speculation that Roe v. Wade may be overturned. For decades, public opinion polls have asked people how they feel about overturning Roe v. Wade . However, people may be uninformed about Roe v. Wade and the implications of overturning the decision. To account for this, we examined people’s knowledge of and sentiments toward Roe v. Wade using a tiered survey design. First, we assessed participants’ baseline knowledge. Next, we provided information about Roe v. Wade and implications associated with overturning the decision. Finally, we assessed people’s sentiments toward Roe v. Wade . Using quota-based sampling, data were collected from a national sample of English- and Spanish-speaking US adults ( N  = 2557). Results suggest people are somewhat knowledgeable—they know Roe v. Wade pertains to abortion and they know abortion is currently legal. However, people were less knowledgeable about implications of overturning the decision. Although the majority of our sample supported upholding Roe v. Wade , support was lower compared with previous research. Perhaps being more informed dissuaded some support. We recommend researchers use comprehensive mechanisms to assess complex issues, like Roe v. Wade . We also recommend policy-makers avoid basing important decisions on data from single, simplistic items.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13178-019-00392-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2232276110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232276110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-256497a12f0a8877a67e1a209d5866ddb3cc5729097c67cae252e2169fb14f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhYMoWKsv4GrAder8JPOzlOJvi4K1uBymyU2b2mTamaTiztfw9XwSp43gzs29F-53zoETRecEDwjG4tITRoSMMVExxkzRmB5EPZKmLOac4MNwSy5jJWVyHJ14vwxQKtOkF21GtX1fQT4HZOocTaBuyioMj2yBni2g7QC9mhxQWaNmAeF-g93rofVNmQEama2pTTtffH9-efRoq7I2TWkDbPf8dDAZoEm7dlABGtrWNafRUWFWHs5-dz-a3ly_DO_i8dPt_fBqHGeMqCamKU-UMIQW2EgphOECiKFY5ankPM9nLMtSQRVWIuMiM0BTCpRwVcxIUnBg_eii8107u2nBN3oZ4usQqSlllApOCA4U7ajMWe8dFHrtysq4D02w3lWru2p1qFbvq9U0iFgn8gGu5-D-rP9R_QBwMHt7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232276110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge and Sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the Wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Jozkowski, Kristen N. ; Crawford, Brandon L. ; Turner, Ronna C. ; Lo, Wen-Juo</creator><creatorcontrib>Jozkowski, Kristen N. ; Crawford, Brandon L. ; Turner, Ronna C. ; Lo, Wen-Juo</creatorcontrib><description>With Justice Kavanaugh joining the U.S. Supreme Court, there is speculation that Roe v. Wade may be overturned. For decades, public opinion polls have asked people how they feel about overturning Roe v. Wade . However, people may be uninformed about Roe v. Wade and the implications of overturning the decision. To account for this, we examined people’s knowledge of and sentiments toward Roe v. Wade using a tiered survey design. First, we assessed participants’ baseline knowledge. Next, we provided information about Roe v. Wade and implications associated with overturning the decision. Finally, we assessed people’s sentiments toward Roe v. Wade . Using quota-based sampling, data were collected from a national sample of English- and Spanish-speaking US adults ( N  = 2557). Results suggest people are somewhat knowledgeable—they know Roe v. Wade pertains to abortion and they know abortion is currently legal. However, people were less knowledgeable about implications of overturning the decision. Although the majority of our sample supported upholding Roe v. Wade , support was lower compared with previous research. Perhaps being more informed dissuaded some support. We recommend researchers use comprehensive mechanisms to assess complex issues, like Roe v. Wade . We also recommend policy-makers avoid basing important decisions on data from single, simplistic items.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-9884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-6610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13178-019-00392-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Adults ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Decisions ; Justice ; Knowledge ; Overturning ; Policy making ; Psychology ; Public opinion ; Public opinion surveys ; Sampling ; Sexual Behavior ; Social Sciences ; Supreme courts</subject><ispartof>Sexuality research &amp; social policy, 2020-06, Vol.17 (2), p.285-300</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-256497a12f0a8877a67e1a209d5866ddb3cc5729097c67cae252e2169fb14f6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-256497a12f0a8877a67e1a209d5866ddb3cc5729097c67cae252e2169fb14f6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2232276110?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12844,21385,21392,21393,27342,27864,27922,27923,30997,33609,33772,33983,34528,43731,43946,44113</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jozkowski, Kristen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Brandon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Ronna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Wen-Juo</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge and Sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the Wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court</title><title>Sexuality research &amp; social policy</title><addtitle>Sex Res Soc Policy</addtitle><description>With Justice Kavanaugh joining the U.S. Supreme Court, there is speculation that Roe v. Wade may be overturned. For decades, public opinion polls have asked people how they feel about overturning Roe v. Wade . However, people may be uninformed about Roe v. Wade and the implications of overturning the decision. To account for this, we examined people’s knowledge of and sentiments toward Roe v. Wade using a tiered survey design. First, we assessed participants’ baseline knowledge. Next, we provided information about Roe v. Wade and implications associated with overturning the decision. Finally, we assessed people’s sentiments toward Roe v. Wade . Using quota-based sampling, data were collected from a national sample of English- and Spanish-speaking US adults ( N  = 2557). Results suggest people are somewhat knowledgeable—they know Roe v. Wade pertains to abortion and they know abortion is currently legal. However, people were less knowledgeable about implications of overturning the decision. Although the majority of our sample supported upholding Roe v. Wade , support was lower compared with previous research. Perhaps being more informed dissuaded some support. We recommend researchers use comprehensive mechanisms to assess complex issues, like Roe v. Wade . We also recommend policy-makers avoid basing important decisions on data from single, simplistic items.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Overturning</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Supreme courts</subject><issn>1868-9884</issn><issn>1553-6610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhYMoWKsv4GrAder8JPOzlOJvi4K1uBymyU2b2mTamaTiztfw9XwSp43gzs29F-53zoETRecEDwjG4tITRoSMMVExxkzRmB5EPZKmLOac4MNwSy5jJWVyHJ14vwxQKtOkF21GtX1fQT4HZOocTaBuyioMj2yBni2g7QC9mhxQWaNmAeF-g93rofVNmQEama2pTTtffH9-efRoq7I2TWkDbPf8dDAZoEm7dlABGtrWNafRUWFWHs5-dz-a3ly_DO_i8dPt_fBqHGeMqCamKU-UMIQW2EgphOECiKFY5ankPM9nLMtSQRVWIuMiM0BTCpRwVcxIUnBg_eii8107u2nBN3oZ4usQqSlllApOCA4U7ajMWe8dFHrtysq4D02w3lWru2p1qFbvq9U0iFgn8gGu5-D-rP9R_QBwMHt7</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Jozkowski, Kristen N.</creator><creator>Crawford, Brandon L.</creator><creator>Turner, Ronna C.</creator><creator>Lo, Wen-Juo</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Knowledge and Sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the Wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court</title><author>Jozkowski, Kristen N. ; Crawford, Brandon L. ; Turner, Ronna C. ; Lo, Wen-Juo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-256497a12f0a8877a67e1a209d5866ddb3cc5729097c67cae252e2169fb14f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Overturning</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Supreme courts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jozkowski, Kristen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Brandon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Ronna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Wen-Juo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sexuality research &amp; social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jozkowski, Kristen N.</au><au>Crawford, Brandon L.</au><au>Turner, Ronna C.</au><au>Lo, Wen-Juo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge and Sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the Wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court</atitle><jtitle>Sexuality research &amp; social policy</jtitle><stitle>Sex Res Soc Policy</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>285-300</pages><issn>1868-9884</issn><eissn>1553-6610</eissn><abstract>With Justice Kavanaugh joining the U.S. Supreme Court, there is speculation that Roe v. Wade may be overturned. For decades, public opinion polls have asked people how they feel about overturning Roe v. Wade . However, people may be uninformed about Roe v. Wade and the implications of overturning the decision. To account for this, we examined people’s knowledge of and sentiments toward Roe v. Wade using a tiered survey design. First, we assessed participants’ baseline knowledge. Next, we provided information about Roe v. Wade and implications associated with overturning the decision. Finally, we assessed people’s sentiments toward Roe v. Wade . Using quota-based sampling, data were collected from a national sample of English- and Spanish-speaking US adults ( N  = 2557). Results suggest people are somewhat knowledgeable—they know Roe v. Wade pertains to abortion and they know abortion is currently legal. However, people were less knowledgeable about implications of overturning the decision. Although the majority of our sample supported upholding Roe v. Wade , support was lower compared with previous research. Perhaps being more informed dissuaded some support. We recommend researchers use comprehensive mechanisms to assess complex issues, like Roe v. Wade . We also recommend policy-makers avoid basing important decisions on data from single, simplistic items.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s13178-019-00392-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-9884
ispartof Sexuality research & social policy, 2020-06, Vol.17 (2), p.285-300
issn 1868-9884
1553-6610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2232276110
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Abortion
Adults
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Decisions
Justice
Knowledge
Overturning
Policy making
Psychology
Public opinion
Public opinion surveys
Sampling
Sexual Behavior
Social Sciences
Supreme courts
title Knowledge and Sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the Wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20and%20Sentiments%20of%20Roe%20v.%20Wade%20in%20the%20Wake%20of%20Justice%20Kavanaugh%E2%80%99s%20Nomination%20to%20the%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court&rft.jtitle=Sexuality%20research%20&%20social%20policy&rft.au=Jozkowski,%20Kristen%20N.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=285-300&rft.issn=1868-9884&rft.eissn=1553-6610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13178-019-00392-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232276110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-256497a12f0a8877a67e1a209d5866ddb3cc5729097c67cae252e2169fb14f6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232276110&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true