Loading…
Extreme Inequality and State Capture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy in The United States
This essay looks behind the failure of representation by the party system and the deep political polarization that marks the rise of populism within liberal democracies to examine two of the basic causes for the 2016 success of Donald Trump: extreme inequality and the exceptional manipulability of t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chinese political science review 2019-06, Vol.4 (2), p.164-187 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ab0ed64b3676cce17b22e4d9e580e91a276408980f501dc0b56530d7031d10e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ab0ed64b3676cce17b22e4d9e580e91a276408980f501dc0b56530d7031d10e3 |
container_end_page | 187 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 164 |
container_title | Chinese political science review |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Karl, Terry Lynn |
description | This essay looks behind the failure of representation by the party system and the deep political polarization that marks the rise of populism within liberal democracies to examine two of the basic causes for the 2016 success of Donald Trump: extreme inequality and the exceptional manipulability of the US electoral system. Populism on the right can be found on both sides of the Atlantic, but it is especially dangerous when compared to Western Europe. The interaction between the extremity of US inequality and its uniquely unrepresentative electoral institutions has permitted bigotry to become the platform and strategy of one of its two mainstream political parties, the Republican Party. While this appears to privilege visible “identity” as the main cleavage in the US, this is deceptive, drawing attention away from the central driver of crisis: the concentration of wealth at the very top that permits the capture of democratic institutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41111-019-00122-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2233151959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2233151959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ab0ed64b3676cce17b22e4d9e580e91a276408980f501dc0b56530d7031d10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AU8LnqMz-5FtvEmtWih4sL14WTbJRFPapN3dgP33xrbozbnMDDzPDLyMXSPcIoC5Cwr7SgCzBACFSNQZGwiZ6kQJLc5_Z6Uu2SiEFQAIVAZSM2Dv06_oaUN81tCuc-s67rlrSv4WXSQ-cdvYebrni89-8XWoA28rPq9z8m7NH2nTFt4Ve143B2TZ1JFOcrhiF5VbBxqd-pAtn6aLyUsyf32eTR7mSSExi4lxOVCZqlymJi0KQpMLQarMSI-BMnTCpArG2RgqDVgWkOtUSygNSCwRSA7ZzfHu1re7jkK0q7bzTf_SCiElasx01lPiSBW-DcFTZbe-3ji_twj2J0Z7jNH2MdpDjFb1kjxKoYebD_J_p_-xvgFy13Mh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2233151959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extreme Inequality and State Capture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy in The United States</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Karl, Terry Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Karl, Terry Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>This essay looks behind the failure of representation by the party system and the deep political polarization that marks the rise of populism within liberal democracies to examine two of the basic causes for the 2016 success of Donald Trump: extreme inequality and the exceptional manipulability of the US electoral system. Populism on the right can be found on both sides of the Atlantic, but it is especially dangerous when compared to Western Europe. The interaction between the extremity of US inequality and its uniquely unrepresentative electoral institutions has permitted bigotry to become the platform and strategy of one of its two mainstream political parties, the Republican Party. While this appears to privilege visible “identity” as the main cleavage in the US, this is deceptive, drawing attention away from the central driver of crisis: the concentration of wealth at the very top that permits the capture of democratic institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2365-4244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2365-4252</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41111-019-00122-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Cleavage ; Crises ; Democracy ; Elections ; Identity ; Inequality ; Original Article ; Polarization ; Political parties ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Populism ; Prejudice ; Representation ; Social privilege ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Chinese political science review, 2019-06, Vol.4 (2), p.164-187</ispartof><rights>Fudan University 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ab0ed64b3676cce17b22e4d9e580e91a276408980f501dc0b56530d7031d10e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ab0ed64b3676cce17b22e4d9e580e91a276408980f501dc0b56530d7031d10e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karl, Terry Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>Extreme Inequality and State Capture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy in The United States</title><title>Chinese political science review</title><addtitle>Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev</addtitle><description>This essay looks behind the failure of representation by the party system and the deep political polarization that marks the rise of populism within liberal democracies to examine two of the basic causes for the 2016 success of Donald Trump: extreme inequality and the exceptional manipulability of the US electoral system. Populism on the right can be found on both sides of the Atlantic, but it is especially dangerous when compared to Western Europe. The interaction between the extremity of US inequality and its uniquely unrepresentative electoral institutions has permitted bigotry to become the platform and strategy of one of its two mainstream political parties, the Republican Party. While this appears to privilege visible “identity” as the main cleavage in the US, this is deceptive, drawing attention away from the central driver of crisis: the concentration of wealth at the very top that permits the capture of democratic institutions.</description><subject>Cleavage</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Social privilege</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>2365-4244</issn><issn>2365-4252</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-AU8LnqMz-5FtvEmtWih4sL14WTbJRFPapN3dgP33xrbozbnMDDzPDLyMXSPcIoC5Cwr7SgCzBACFSNQZGwiZ6kQJLc5_Z6Uu2SiEFQAIVAZSM2Dv06_oaUN81tCuc-s67rlrSv4WXSQ-cdvYebrni89-8XWoA28rPq9z8m7NH2nTFt4Ve143B2TZ1JFOcrhiF5VbBxqd-pAtn6aLyUsyf32eTR7mSSExi4lxOVCZqlymJi0KQpMLQarMSI-BMnTCpArG2RgqDVgWkOtUSygNSCwRSA7ZzfHu1re7jkK0q7bzTf_SCiElasx01lPiSBW-DcFTZbe-3ji_twj2J0Z7jNH2MdpDjFb1kjxKoYebD_J_p_-xvgFy13Mh</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Karl, Terry Lynn</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Extreme Inequality and State Capture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy in The United States</title><author>Karl, Terry Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ab0ed64b3676cce17b22e4d9e580e91a276408980f501dc0b56530d7031d10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cleavage</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Representation</topic><topic>Social privilege</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karl, Terry Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chinese political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karl, Terry Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extreme Inequality and State Capture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy in The United States</atitle><jtitle>Chinese political science review</jtitle><stitle>Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>164-187</pages><issn>2365-4244</issn><eissn>2365-4252</eissn><abstract>This essay looks behind the failure of representation by the party system and the deep political polarization that marks the rise of populism within liberal democracies to examine two of the basic causes for the 2016 success of Donald Trump: extreme inequality and the exceptional manipulability of the US electoral system. Populism on the right can be found on both sides of the Atlantic, but it is especially dangerous when compared to Western Europe. The interaction between the extremity of US inequality and its uniquely unrepresentative electoral institutions has permitted bigotry to become the platform and strategy of one of its two mainstream political parties, the Republican Party. While this appears to privilege visible “identity” as the main cleavage in the US, this is deceptive, drawing attention away from the central driver of crisis: the concentration of wealth at the very top that permits the capture of democratic institutions.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s41111-019-00122-4</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2365-4244 |
ispartof | Chinese political science review, 2019-06, Vol.4 (2), p.164-187 |
issn | 2365-4244 2365-4252 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2233151959 |
source | Springer Nature; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Cleavage Crises Democracy Elections Identity Inequality Original Article Polarization Political parties Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Populism Prejudice Representation Social privilege Wealth |
title | Extreme Inequality and State Capture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy in The United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A08%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extreme%20Inequality%20and%20State%20Capture:%20The%20Crisis%20of%20Liberal%20Democracy%20in%20The%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Chinese%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Karl,%20Terry%20Lynn&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=164-187&rft.issn=2365-4244&rft.eissn=2365-4252&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41111-019-00122-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2233151959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7ab0ed64b3676cce17b22e4d9e580e91a276408980f501dc0b56530d7031d10e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2233151959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |