Loading…

Measuring apparent dose rate factors using beta and gamma rays, and alpha efficiency for precise thermoluminescence dating of calcite

In addition to the conventional 14C and Th/U dating methods, thermoluminescence (TL) dating has been applied to calcite, but has been less popular partly because the luminescence responses for different types of radiation are unclear. To report more reliable TL ages for calcite, the fundamental char...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences 2017, Vol.112(6), pp.336-345
Main Authors: OGATA, Manabu, HASEBE, Noriko, FUJII, Naoki, YAMAKAWA, Minoru
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-3db1145bbdb2bf4956635fa571329b31558a3f71de7da2f7ab616a35e6cf31233
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-3db1145bbdb2bf4956635fa571329b31558a3f71de7da2f7ab616a35e6cf31233
container_end_page 345
container_issue 6
container_start_page 336
container_title Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences
container_volume 112
creator OGATA, Manabu
HASEBE, Noriko
FUJII, Naoki
YAMAKAWA, Minoru
description In addition to the conventional 14C and Th/U dating methods, thermoluminescence (TL) dating has been applied to calcite, but has been less popular partly because the luminescence responses for different types of radiation are unclear. To report more reliable TL ages for calcite, the fundamental characteristics of its response to radiation exposure were investigated and related to chemical composition. Relative TL factors for calcite after beta and gamma irradiation normalized with quartz, hereafter termed the beta and gamma factors, were measured as 0.19–0.34 and 0.16–0.33, respectively. These lower values than for quartz may be caused by differences in common substitution elements in calcite (20Ca, 25Mn, and 26Fe) versus quartz (3Li, 11Na, 13Al, and 14Si), and the interaction between mediums with different atomic numbers and radiation energies. The beta factor is higher than the gamma factor for some samples. These samples show relatively higher concentrations in lighter elements (up to Ba); thus, the concentration of minor elements may cause differing behavior between beta and gamma rays. The gamma factor may depend on Mn concentration; however, the elements most affecting the beta factor remain unknown. The accumulated dose from alpha rays is affected by sample thickness because of the spatial energy density around the center of the alpha track and luminescence detection range. Thus, for accurate alpha efficiency measurements, evaluation of the effective alpha ray range and luminescence detection thickness is important. The alpha efficiency against the gamma factor, known as the k–value, increases with Mn concentration. Previous studies have suggested that the alpha efficiency is lower than beta and gamma efficiency because the ionization density produced by alpha particles is so great that the thermoluminescence traps in the tracks’ central core become saturated. This leads to a much greater proportion of the ionized electrons being wasted compared with beta and gamma radiation. Thus, we concluded that luminescence traps increase with increasing Mn concentrations.
doi_str_mv 10.2465/jmps.161126
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2233771266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2233771266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-3db1145bbdb2bf4956635fa571329b31558a3f71de7da2f7ab616a35e6cf31233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4gcssYSU2I6dZokqXlIRG1hbE2fcOsoL21n0A_hvkqZiMw_dM3ekG0W3NFmxVIrHqun9ikpKmTyLFpSneczXTJwfZxFLlsvL6Mr7Kkl4xtfJIvr9QPCDs-2OQN-DwzaQsvNIHAQkBnTonCeDn4ACAxBoS7KDpoGROPiH4w51vweCxlhtsdUHYjpHeofajkZhj67p6qGxLXo9ykhKCJNfZ4iGWtuA19GFgdrjzakvo--X56_NW7z9fH3fPG1jLZgIMS8LSlNRFGXBCpPmQkouDIiMcpYXnAqxBm4yWmJWAjMZFJJK4AKlNpwyzpfR3ezbu-5nQB9U1Q2uHV8qNspZNgYnR-p-prTrvHdoVO9sA-6gaKKmnNWUs5pzHunNTFc-wA7_WXDB6hpPLGVKHut89a_qPTiFLf8DSmiK6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2233771266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring apparent dose rate factors using beta and gamma rays, and alpha efficiency for precise thermoluminescence dating of calcite</title><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>OGATA, Manabu ; HASEBE, Noriko ; FUJII, Naoki ; YAMAKAWA, Minoru</creator><creatorcontrib>OGATA, Manabu ; HASEBE, Noriko ; FUJII, Naoki ; YAMAKAWA, Minoru</creatorcontrib><description>In addition to the conventional 14C and Th/U dating methods, thermoluminescence (TL) dating has been applied to calcite, but has been less popular partly because the luminescence responses for different types of radiation are unclear. To report more reliable TL ages for calcite, the fundamental characteristics of its response to radiation exposure were investigated and related to chemical composition. Relative TL factors for calcite after beta and gamma irradiation normalized with quartz, hereafter termed the beta and gamma factors, were measured as 0.19–0.34 and 0.16–0.33, respectively. These lower values than for quartz may be caused by differences in common substitution elements in calcite (20Ca, 25Mn, and 26Fe) versus quartz (3Li, 11Na, 13Al, and 14Si), and the interaction between mediums with different atomic numbers and radiation energies. The beta factor is higher than the gamma factor for some samples. These samples show relatively higher concentrations in lighter elements (up to Ba); thus, the concentration of minor elements may cause differing behavior between beta and gamma rays. The gamma factor may depend on Mn concentration; however, the elements most affecting the beta factor remain unknown. The accumulated dose from alpha rays is affected by sample thickness because of the spatial energy density around the center of the alpha track and luminescence detection range. Thus, for accurate alpha efficiency measurements, evaluation of the effective alpha ray range and luminescence detection thickness is important. The alpha efficiency against the gamma factor, known as the k–value, increases with Mn concentration. Previous studies have suggested that the alpha efficiency is lower than beta and gamma efficiency because the ionization density produced by alpha particles is so great that the thermoluminescence traps in the tracks’ central core become saturated. This leads to a much greater proportion of the ionized electrons being wasted compared with beta and gamma radiation. Thus, we concluded that luminescence traps increase with increasing Mn concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1345-6296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-3825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2465/jmps.161126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sendai: Japan Association of Mineralogical Sciences</publisher><subject>Alpha particles ; Alpha rays ; Beta factor ; Beta rays ; Calcite ; Chemical composition ; Dating ; Dating techniques ; Detection ; Dosage ; Dose rate factor ; Efficiency ; Flux density ; Gamma irradiation ; Gamma radiation ; Gamma rays ; Ionization ; Irradiation ; Luminescence ; Luminescence efficiency ; Manganese ; Organic chemistry ; Quartz ; Radiation effects ; Thermoluminescence ; Thermoluminescence dating ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences, 2017, Vol.112(6), pp.336-345</ispartof><rights>2017 Japan Association of Mineralogical Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-3db1145bbdb2bf4956635fa571329b31558a3f71de7da2f7ab616a35e6cf31233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-3db1145bbdb2bf4956635fa571329b31558a3f71de7da2f7ab616a35e6cf31233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>OGATA, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HASEBE, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJII, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAKAWA, Minoru</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring apparent dose rate factors using beta and gamma rays, and alpha efficiency for precise thermoluminescence dating of calcite</title><title>Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences</title><description>In addition to the conventional 14C and Th/U dating methods, thermoluminescence (TL) dating has been applied to calcite, but has been less popular partly because the luminescence responses for different types of radiation are unclear. To report more reliable TL ages for calcite, the fundamental characteristics of its response to radiation exposure were investigated and related to chemical composition. Relative TL factors for calcite after beta and gamma irradiation normalized with quartz, hereafter termed the beta and gamma factors, were measured as 0.19–0.34 and 0.16–0.33, respectively. These lower values than for quartz may be caused by differences in common substitution elements in calcite (20Ca, 25Mn, and 26Fe) versus quartz (3Li, 11Na, 13Al, and 14Si), and the interaction between mediums with different atomic numbers and radiation energies. The beta factor is higher than the gamma factor for some samples. These samples show relatively higher concentrations in lighter elements (up to Ba); thus, the concentration of minor elements may cause differing behavior between beta and gamma rays. The gamma factor may depend on Mn concentration; however, the elements most affecting the beta factor remain unknown. The accumulated dose from alpha rays is affected by sample thickness because of the spatial energy density around the center of the alpha track and luminescence detection range. Thus, for accurate alpha efficiency measurements, evaluation of the effective alpha ray range and luminescence detection thickness is important. The alpha efficiency against the gamma factor, known as the k–value, increases with Mn concentration. Previous studies have suggested that the alpha efficiency is lower than beta and gamma efficiency because the ionization density produced by alpha particles is so great that the thermoluminescence traps in the tracks’ central core become saturated. This leads to a much greater proportion of the ionized electrons being wasted compared with beta and gamma radiation. Thus, we concluded that luminescence traps increase with increasing Mn concentrations.</description><subject>Alpha particles</subject><subject>Alpha rays</subject><subject>Beta factor</subject><subject>Beta rays</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Dating</subject><subject>Dating techniques</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Dose rate factor</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Flux density</subject><subject>Gamma irradiation</subject><subject>Gamma radiation</subject><subject>Gamma rays</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Luminescence</subject><subject>Luminescence efficiency</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Quartz</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Thermoluminescence</subject><subject>Thermoluminescence dating</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>1345-6296</issn><issn>1349-3825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4gcssYSU2I6dZokqXlIRG1hbE2fcOsoL21n0A_hvkqZiMw_dM3ekG0W3NFmxVIrHqun9ikpKmTyLFpSneczXTJwfZxFLlsvL6Mr7Kkl4xtfJIvr9QPCDs-2OQN-DwzaQsvNIHAQkBnTonCeDn4ACAxBoS7KDpoGROPiH4w51vweCxlhtsdUHYjpHeofajkZhj67p6qGxLXo9ykhKCJNfZ4iGWtuA19GFgdrjzakvo--X56_NW7z9fH3fPG1jLZgIMS8LSlNRFGXBCpPmQkouDIiMcpYXnAqxBm4yWmJWAjMZFJJK4AKlNpwyzpfR3ezbu-5nQB9U1Q2uHV8qNspZNgYnR-p-prTrvHdoVO9sA-6gaKKmnNWUs5pzHunNTFc-wA7_WXDB6hpPLGVKHut89a_qPTiFLf8DSmiK6Q</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>OGATA, Manabu</creator><creator>HASEBE, Noriko</creator><creator>FUJII, Naoki</creator><creator>YAMAKAWA, Minoru</creator><general>Japan Association of Mineralogical Sciences</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Measuring apparent dose rate factors using beta and gamma rays, and alpha efficiency for precise thermoluminescence dating of calcite</title><author>OGATA, Manabu ; HASEBE, Noriko ; FUJII, Naoki ; YAMAKAWA, Minoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-3db1145bbdb2bf4956635fa571329b31558a3f71de7da2f7ab616a35e6cf31233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alpha particles</topic><topic>Alpha rays</topic><topic>Beta factor</topic><topic>Beta rays</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Dating</topic><topic>Dating techniques</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Dose rate factor</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Flux density</topic><topic>Gamma irradiation</topic><topic>Gamma radiation</topic><topic>Gamma rays</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Luminescence</topic><topic>Luminescence efficiency</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Quartz</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Thermoluminescence</topic><topic>Thermoluminescence dating</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OGATA, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HASEBE, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUJII, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAKAWA, Minoru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OGATA, Manabu</au><au>HASEBE, Noriko</au><au>FUJII, Naoki</au><au>YAMAKAWA, Minoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring apparent dose rate factors using beta and gamma rays, and alpha efficiency for precise thermoluminescence dating of calcite</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>345</epage><pages>336-345</pages><issn>1345-6296</issn><eissn>1349-3825</eissn><abstract>In addition to the conventional 14C and Th/U dating methods, thermoluminescence (TL) dating has been applied to calcite, but has been less popular partly because the luminescence responses for different types of radiation are unclear. To report more reliable TL ages for calcite, the fundamental characteristics of its response to radiation exposure were investigated and related to chemical composition. Relative TL factors for calcite after beta and gamma irradiation normalized with quartz, hereafter termed the beta and gamma factors, were measured as 0.19–0.34 and 0.16–0.33, respectively. These lower values than for quartz may be caused by differences in common substitution elements in calcite (20Ca, 25Mn, and 26Fe) versus quartz (3Li, 11Na, 13Al, and 14Si), and the interaction between mediums with different atomic numbers and radiation energies. The beta factor is higher than the gamma factor for some samples. These samples show relatively higher concentrations in lighter elements (up to Ba); thus, the concentration of minor elements may cause differing behavior between beta and gamma rays. The gamma factor may depend on Mn concentration; however, the elements most affecting the beta factor remain unknown. The accumulated dose from alpha rays is affected by sample thickness because of the spatial energy density around the center of the alpha track and luminescence detection range. Thus, for accurate alpha efficiency measurements, evaluation of the effective alpha ray range and luminescence detection thickness is important. The alpha efficiency against the gamma factor, known as the k–value, increases with Mn concentration. Previous studies have suggested that the alpha efficiency is lower than beta and gamma efficiency because the ionization density produced by alpha particles is so great that the thermoluminescence traps in the tracks’ central core become saturated. This leads to a much greater proportion of the ionized electrons being wasted compared with beta and gamma radiation. Thus, we concluded that luminescence traps increase with increasing Mn concentrations.</abstract><cop>Sendai</cop><pub>Japan Association of Mineralogical Sciences</pub><doi>10.2465/jmps.161126</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1345-6296
ispartof Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences, 2017, Vol.112(6), pp.336-345
issn 1345-6296
1349-3825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2233771266
source Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Alpha particles
Alpha rays
Beta factor
Beta rays
Calcite
Chemical composition
Dating
Dating techniques
Detection
Dosage
Dose rate factor
Efficiency
Flux density
Gamma irradiation
Gamma radiation
Gamma rays
Ionization
Irradiation
Luminescence
Luminescence efficiency
Manganese
Organic chemistry
Quartz
Radiation effects
Thermoluminescence
Thermoluminescence dating
Thickness
title Measuring apparent dose rate factors using beta and gamma rays, and alpha efficiency for precise thermoluminescence dating of calcite
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A12%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20apparent%20dose%20rate%20factors%20using%20beta%20and%20gamma%20rays,%20and%20alpha%20efficiency%20for%20precise%20thermoluminescence%20dating%20of%20calcite&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Mineralogical%20and%20Petrological%20Sciences&rft.au=OGATA,%20Manabu&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=345&rft.pages=336-345&rft.issn=1345-6296&rft.eissn=1349-3825&rft_id=info:doi/10.2465/jmps.161126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2233771266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-3db1145bbdb2bf4956635fa571329b31558a3f71de7da2f7ab616a35e6cf31233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2233771266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true