Loading…

Research in Mathematics Education: Multiple Methods for Multiple Uses

I do not think any thoughtful researcher today believes that experiments or randomized field trials are the "gold standard" for addressing all the important questions in educational research. Yet, because these designs are now required by the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and are be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal for research in mathematics education 2009-05, Vol.40 (3), p.216-240
Main Authors: Battista, Michael, Smith, Margaret S, Boerst, Timothy, Sutton, John, Confrey, Jere, White, Dorothy, Knuth, Eric, Quander, Judith
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:I do not think any thoughtful researcher today believes that experiments or randomized field trials are the "gold standard" for addressing all the important questions in educational research. Yet, because these designs are now required by the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and are being strongly encouraged in other federal legislation and funding initiatives, scholars, practitioners, parents, and researchers must devote time and energy to fighting these designs when they are inappropriate or irrelevant, which is often the case. Despite long-standing objections from prominent methodologists and reservations expressed by national groups and committees, key policymakers in the federal government are encouraging the pursuit of experimental designs primarily or exclusively (Eisenhart, 2005, p. 246).
ISSN:0021-8251
1945-2306