Alternative Courts? Litigation-Induced Claims Resolution Facilities

Hensler raises equity, efficiency, and due process questions concerning the increasing popularity of using claims resolution facilities for alternative dispute resolution. Little research has been done on claims resolution facilities, and as their number, variety and complexity increase, the need to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stanford law review 2005-04, Vol.57 (5), p.1429-1439
Main Author: Hensler, Deborah R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alternative dispute resolution
Asbestos
Attorneys
Bankruptcy trusteeship
Claims processing
Class action lawsuits
Compensation
Compromise and settlement
Damage claims
Damages
Damages (Law)
Due process of law
Facilities
Government regulation
Laws, regulations and rules
Legal ethics
Litigation
Mass torts
Personal injury damages
Settlements (Law)
Torts
Victim compensation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Hensler raises equity, efficiency, and due process questions concerning the increasing popularity of using claims resolution facilities for alternative dispute resolution. Little research has been done on claims resolution facilities, and as their number, variety and complexity increase, the need to know more about the consequences of their use becomes more pressing.
ISSN:0038-9765
1939-8581