Diversifying but not Integrating: Entropic Measures of Local Segregation

Scholars of segregation have struggled to adapt indices designed to model two‐group segregation for cities with large populations drawn from more than two racial/ethnic groups. Considering segregation as a social form of entropy resolves that struggle and introduces a family of related measures that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 2019-07, Vol.110 (3), p.251-270
Main Authors: Kramer, Rory, Kramer, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cities
Entropy
Ethnic groups
methodology
Minority & ethnic groups
Neighborhoods
neighbourhood
Philadelphia
race
Racial segregation
Residential segregation
Segregation
urban
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Scholars of segregation have struggled to adapt indices designed to model two‐group segregation for cities with large populations drawn from more than two racial/ethnic groups. Considering segregation as a social form of entropy resolves that struggle and introduces a family of related measures that offer means of analysing segregation at both the local (neighbourhood) level and the greater (city/region) area. A case study of Philadelphia's level of segregation from 1990 to 2010 illustrates the benefits of the new measures. While Philadelphia has diversified, it remains racially segregated. Further, the new measures show the growing importance of Hispanic segregation and a shift from segregation being visited upon the city's Black residents to being driven by a White population that grows more segregated as its population share shrinks. Integrating measures of segregation and diversity into studies of residential racial patterns enhances our understanding of racial segregation patterns in a multiracial context.
ISSN:0040-747X
1467-9663
DOI:10.1111/tesg.12306