Loading…

Integrated geophysical exploration in onshore frontier basins

ABSTRACT Faced with the challenge of rapidly screening a huge expanse of frontier exploration acreage, often characterized by sparse vintage data, it is our experience that a combination of appropriate air‐ and ground‐based geophysical techniques contributes positively to the exploration value chain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Prospecting 2019-07, Vol.67 (6), p.1664-1675
Main Authors: Martini, F., Rogers, E., Bennett, S., Davi, R., Doherty, J.T., Mongan, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3386-6707257d8b94db86d618411f8be6795402d039edd0f9e1d3ff77d802336b07f63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3386-6707257d8b94db86d618411f8be6795402d039edd0f9e1d3ff77d802336b07f63
container_end_page 1675
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1664
container_title Geophysical Prospecting
container_volume 67
creator Martini, F.
Rogers, E.
Bennett, S.
Davi, R.
Doherty, J.T.
Mongan, J.
description ABSTRACT Faced with the challenge of rapidly screening a huge expanse of frontier exploration acreage, often characterized by sparse vintage data, it is our experience that a combination of appropriate air‐ and ground‐based geophysical techniques contributes positively to the exploration value chain. Airborne gravity gradiometry in conjunction with conventional gravity and magnetic data, as well as geological knowledge, add significant value to the screening process. This combination can subsequently assist in optimizing the location of the more time‐consuming and expensive seismic programme. In addition, analysis and inversion of passive seismic data have also proven useful in providing depth to basement estimates, and results derived from all the techniques investigated have been consistent within several study areas. Following initial tests, where the data were independently analysed and cross‐checked for consistency (including comparisons with active source seismic data and well data, when available), the company now routinely adopts the integration of these techniques in our frontier exploration acreage to support sedimentary basin delineation and mapping. This allows the optimal positioning and focussing of the higher spend and higher footprint programmes, such as active reflection seismic.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2478.12706
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2241543459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2241543459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3386-6707257d8b94db86d618411f8be6795402d039edd0f9e1d3ff77d802336b07f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXgOe085-JwcPUrQWCoroeUm6u-2WuBt3UzT_3tSIV-cy8PK8M_AgdI1hhoeZYyp4TpgsZphIECdo8pecogkAFnkBhJ-ji5T2ABQ4ZxN0u_Kd2caqMzrbmtDu-uQ2VZOZr7YJQ-yCz5zPgk-7EE1mY_CdMzGrq-R8ukRntmqSufrdU_T2cP-6eMzXT8vV4m6dV5QWIhcSJOFSF3XJdF0ILXDBMLZFbYQsOQOigZZGa7ClwZpaKwcYCKWiBmkFnaKb8W4bw8fBpE7twyH64aUihGHOKOPlQM1HahNDStFY1Ub3XsVeYVBHR-poRB2NqB9HQ4OPjU_XmP4_XC2fX8beN8EVZ5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2241543459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated geophysical exploration in onshore frontier basins</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Martini, F. ; Rogers, E. ; Bennett, S. ; Davi, R. ; Doherty, J.T. ; Mongan, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martini, F. ; Rogers, E. ; Bennett, S. ; Davi, R. ; Doherty, J.T. ; Mongan, J.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Faced with the challenge of rapidly screening a huge expanse of frontier exploration acreage, often characterized by sparse vintage data, it is our experience that a combination of appropriate air‐ and ground‐based geophysical techniques contributes positively to the exploration value chain. Airborne gravity gradiometry in conjunction with conventional gravity and magnetic data, as well as geological knowledge, add significant value to the screening process. This combination can subsequently assist in optimizing the location of the more time‐consuming and expensive seismic programme. In addition, analysis and inversion of passive seismic data have also proven useful in providing depth to basement estimates, and results derived from all the techniques investigated have been consistent within several study areas. Following initial tests, where the data were independently analysed and cross‐checked for consistency (including comparisons with active source seismic data and well data, when available), the company now routinely adopts the integration of these techniques in our frontier exploration acreage to support sedimentary basin delineation and mapping. This allows the optimal positioning and focussing of the higher spend and higher footprint programmes, such as active reflection seismic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Houten: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Airborne geophysics ; Frontier exploration ; Geophysical exploration ; Geophysics ; Gravitation ; Gravity ; Integrated geophysics ; Magnetic ; Magnetic data ; Magnetic measurement ; Mapping ; Optimization ; Passive seismic ; Screening ; Sedimentary basins ; Seismic analysis ; Seismic data ; Seismic surveys ; Well data</subject><ispartof>Geophysical Prospecting, 2019-07, Vol.67 (6), p.1664-1675</ispartof><rights>2018 European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers</rights><rights>2019 European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3386-6707257d8b94db86d618411f8be6795402d039edd0f9e1d3ff77d802336b07f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3386-6707257d8b94db86d618411f8be6795402d039edd0f9e1d3ff77d802336b07f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martini, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongan, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated geophysical exploration in onshore frontier basins</title><title>Geophysical Prospecting</title><description>ABSTRACT Faced with the challenge of rapidly screening a huge expanse of frontier exploration acreage, often characterized by sparse vintage data, it is our experience that a combination of appropriate air‐ and ground‐based geophysical techniques contributes positively to the exploration value chain. Airborne gravity gradiometry in conjunction with conventional gravity and magnetic data, as well as geological knowledge, add significant value to the screening process. This combination can subsequently assist in optimizing the location of the more time‐consuming and expensive seismic programme. In addition, analysis and inversion of passive seismic data have also proven useful in providing depth to basement estimates, and results derived from all the techniques investigated have been consistent within several study areas. Following initial tests, where the data were independently analysed and cross‐checked for consistency (including comparisons with active source seismic data and well data, when available), the company now routinely adopts the integration of these techniques in our frontier exploration acreage to support sedimentary basin delineation and mapping. This allows the optimal positioning and focussing of the higher spend and higher footprint programmes, such as active reflection seismic.</description><subject>Airborne geophysics</subject><subject>Frontier exploration</subject><subject>Geophysical exploration</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Integrated geophysics</subject><subject>Magnetic</subject><subject>Magnetic data</subject><subject>Magnetic measurement</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Passive seismic</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sedimentary basins</subject><subject>Seismic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic data</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Well data</subject><issn>0016-8025</issn><issn>1365-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXgOe085-JwcPUrQWCoroeUm6u-2WuBt3UzT_3tSIV-cy8PK8M_AgdI1hhoeZYyp4TpgsZphIECdo8pecogkAFnkBhJ-ji5T2ABQ4ZxN0u_Kd2caqMzrbmtDu-uQ2VZOZr7YJQ-yCz5zPgk-7EE1mY_CdMzGrq-R8ukRntmqSufrdU_T2cP-6eMzXT8vV4m6dV5QWIhcSJOFSF3XJdF0ILXDBMLZFbYQsOQOigZZGa7ClwZpaKwcYCKWiBmkFnaKb8W4bw8fBpE7twyH64aUihGHOKOPlQM1HahNDStFY1Ub3XsVeYVBHR-poRB2NqB9HQ4OPjU_XmP4_XC2fX8beN8EVZ5I</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Martini, F.</creator><creator>Rogers, E.</creator><creator>Bennett, S.</creator><creator>Davi, R.</creator><creator>Doherty, J.T.</creator><creator>Mongan, J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Integrated geophysical exploration in onshore frontier basins</title><author>Martini, F. ; Rogers, E. ; Bennett, S. ; Davi, R. ; Doherty, J.T. ; Mongan, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3386-6707257d8b94db86d618411f8be6795402d039edd0f9e1d3ff77d802336b07f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Airborne geophysics</topic><topic>Frontier exploration</topic><topic>Geophysical exploration</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Integrated geophysics</topic><topic>Magnetic</topic><topic>Magnetic data</topic><topic>Magnetic measurement</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Passive seismic</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sedimentary basins</topic><topic>Seismic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic data</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Well data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martini, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongan, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martini, F.</au><au>Rogers, E.</au><au>Bennett, S.</au><au>Davi, R.</au><au>Doherty, J.T.</au><au>Mongan, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated geophysical exploration in onshore frontier basins</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1664</spage><epage>1675</epage><pages>1664-1675</pages><issn>0016-8025</issn><eissn>1365-2478</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Faced with the challenge of rapidly screening a huge expanse of frontier exploration acreage, often characterized by sparse vintage data, it is our experience that a combination of appropriate air‐ and ground‐based geophysical techniques contributes positively to the exploration value chain. Airborne gravity gradiometry in conjunction with conventional gravity and magnetic data, as well as geological knowledge, add significant value to the screening process. This combination can subsequently assist in optimizing the location of the more time‐consuming and expensive seismic programme. In addition, analysis and inversion of passive seismic data have also proven useful in providing depth to basement estimates, and results derived from all the techniques investigated have been consistent within several study areas. Following initial tests, where the data were independently analysed and cross‐checked for consistency (including comparisons with active source seismic data and well data, when available), the company now routinely adopts the integration of these techniques in our frontier exploration acreage to support sedimentary basin delineation and mapping. This allows the optimal positioning and focussing of the higher spend and higher footprint programmes, such as active reflection seismic.</abstract><cop>Houten</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2478.12706</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8025
ispartof Geophysical Prospecting, 2019-07, Vol.67 (6), p.1664-1675
issn 0016-8025
1365-2478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2241543459
source Wiley
subjects Airborne geophysics
Frontier exploration
Geophysical exploration
Geophysics
Gravitation
Gravity
Integrated geophysics
Magnetic
Magnetic data
Magnetic measurement
Mapping
Optimization
Passive seismic
Screening
Sedimentary basins
Seismic analysis
Seismic data
Seismic surveys
Well data
title Integrated geophysical exploration in onshore frontier basins
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20geophysical%20exploration%20in%20onshore%20frontier%20basins&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20Prospecting&rft.au=Martini,%20F.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1664&rft.epage=1675&rft.pages=1664-1675&rft.issn=0016-8025&rft.eissn=1365-2478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2478.12706&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2241543459%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3386-6707257d8b94db86d618411f8be6795402d039edd0f9e1d3ff77d802336b07f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2241543459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true