Numerical values of shape factors for field permeability tests in unconfined aquifers

Field permeability tests are used to evaluate the local hydraulic conductivity. Their interpretation requires knowing the value of a shape factor, c . Regular values for shape factors were obtained for fully saturated conditions in an infinite material. However, many tests are performed in unconfine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta geotechnica 2020-05, Vol.15 (5), p.1243-1257
Main Authors: Zhang, Lu, Chapuis, Robert P., Marefat, Vahid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aquifer testing
Aquifers
Complex Fluids and Microfluidics
Dimensions
Distance
Engineering
Foundations
Geoengineering
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Groundwater
Hydraulics
Mathematical models
Model testing
Permeability
Permeability tests
Research Paper
Seepage
Shape
Shape factor
Soft and Granular Matter
Soil
Soil permeability
Soil Science & Conservation
Soil water
Solid Mechanics
Tests
Unconfined aquifers
Water injection
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Field permeability tests are used to evaluate the local hydraulic conductivity. Their interpretation requires knowing the value of a shape factor, c . Regular values for shape factors were obtained for fully saturated conditions in an infinite material. However, many tests are performed in unconfined aquifers, with a bottom impervious boundary, and partly unsaturated seepage. This paper questions the applicability of the regular c values to field conditions. It presents numerical ways to model field permeability tests in unconfined aquifers and deduce the c value, under steady and transient states, with partly unsaturated seepage. Two series of monitoring wells were analyzed and compared; they have either a filter pack or not. The influences of four variables (radial distance of the external boundary, dimensions and positions of the water injection zone, and aquifer material type) on the numerical c values were studied. The results show that the boundary radial distance markedly affects the numerical c value. Therefore, practical approaches were proposed by reconciling the numerical and realistic test conditions, to determine the representative boundary radial distances for each type of test model. Additionally, the numerical values are compared with the theoretical values of Bouwer and Rice (Water Resour Res 12(3):423–428, 1976) and Hvorslev (Time-lag and soil permeability in ground water observations, U.S. Army Eng Waterw Exp Stn, Vicksburg, 1951 ).
ISSN:1861-1125
1861-1133
DOI:10.1007/s11440-019-00836-4