Reflections around democracy, fundamentalism and technoscience. Popper spining in his grave facing the new historicism of “i”

Technoscience is today as a new panacea regarding the future of humanity and if it is true, technology and innovation have made the world advanced and solve problems in the areas of health sciences, for example, governments see it as a solution to human problems. Here's where democracy runs dan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dilemas contemporáneos: educación, política y valores política y valores, 2016-09, Vol.IV (1)
Main Authors: Juan Guillermo Estay Sepúlveda, Mario Lagomarsino Montoya, Lorena Moraga Gálvez
Format: Article
Language:eng ; spa
Subjects:
Historicism
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Technoscience is today as a new panacea regarding the future of humanity and if it is true, technology and innovation have made the world advanced and solve problems in the areas of health sciences, for example, governments see it as a solution to human problems. Here's where democracy runs danger to the find of a new fundamentalism that lurks. Nothing is one hundred percent accurate, it would tell us Popper language of the XXI century and techno-science; like the historicism of the XIX intended to be a crystal ball that explains everything and solve everything. Open Society is in danger again before the fundamentalism of technoscience of the occidental world.
ISSN:2007-7890