Loading…

Location-specific consequences of beach seine and gillnet capture on upriver-migrating sockeye salmon migration behavior and fate

Fish released after capture, or fish interacting with gear but escaping, sometimes experience fishing-related incidental mortality (FRIM). For adult Pacific salmon migrations, knowing the magnitude of FRIM is important to estimate escapement accurately and to understand the total impact of a specifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 2018-11, Vol.75 (11), p.2011-2023
Main Authors: Bass, Arthur L, Hinch, Scott G, Patterson, David A, Cooke, Steven J, Farrell, Anthony P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-f0d7557d582fa6867119a1432307a15c935fe31f2d3f8eff5a03d092b2669a483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-f0d7557d582fa6867119a1432307a15c935fe31f2d3f8eff5a03d092b2669a483
container_end_page 2023
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2011
container_title Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences
container_volume 75
creator Bass, Arthur L
Hinch, Scott G
Patterson, David A
Cooke, Steven J
Farrell, Anthony P
description Fish released after capture, or fish interacting with gear but escaping, sometimes experience fishing-related incidental mortality (FRIM). For adult Pacific salmon migrations, knowing the magnitude of FRIM is important to estimate escapement accurately and to understand the total impact of a specific fishery. To determine how multiple gear types are associated with FRIM at different levels of maturity, we captured sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) by both gill net and beach seine at three locations along their migration route (10%, 26%, and 72% of a 500 km freshwater migration) and determined their migratory success using biotelemetry. FRIM was higher for fish captured by gill net except at the location closest to spawning grounds. In addition, salmon captured by gill net at the lower river locations temporarily delayed migration, potentially indicating a requirement for lengthier recovery time compared with beach-seined fish. These results provide the first empirical and parallel comparison of these two common in-river fishing methods for salmon, revealing clear differences in FRIM between the two fishing methods in lower river fisheries and the importance of maturity.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0474
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2247985653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A560311543</galeid><sourcerecordid>A560311543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-f0d7557d582fa6867119a1432307a15c935fe31f2d3f8eff5a03d092b2669a483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVks9rFDEUxwdRcK2evQY9eUibH5PJzLEUfxQWBX-At_A28zLNOpNsk5lij_7nZtuCLiyC5JDw8sn3kcenql5ydsq57M7s1kGmgnFNWa3rR9WKC6aoVlI-rlZMs4Y2Snx_Wj3LecsYF4qzVfVrHS3MPgaad2i985bYGDJeLxgsZhId2SDYK5LRByQQejL4cQw4Ewu7eUlIYiDLLvkbTHTyQyppYSA52h94iyTDOBXg4aKcNngFNz6muygHMz6vnjgYM7542E-qb-_efr34QNef3l9enK-prTs9U8d6rZTuVSscNG2jOe-A11JIpoEr20nlUHIneuladE4Bkz3rxEY0TQd1K0-q1_e5uxTL7_JstnFJobQ0QtS6a1VTRvUvqoyMMVUa_qEGGNH44OKcwE4-W3OuGiY5V_U-ix6hBgyYYIwBnS_lA_7VEd7u_LX5Gzo9ApXV4-Tt0dQ3Bw8KM-PPeYAlZ3P55fN_sB8P2bN71qaYc0JnigQTpFvDmdkbae6MNHsjzd5I-Rvei9Bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125005230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Location-specific consequences of beach seine and gillnet capture on upriver-migrating sockeye salmon migration behavior and fate</title><source>Canadian Science Publishing (NRC Research Press) Current</source><creator>Bass, Arthur L ; Hinch, Scott G ; Patterson, David A ; Cooke, Steven J ; Farrell, Anthony P</creator><creatorcontrib>Bass, Arthur L ; Hinch, Scott G ; Patterson, David A ; Cooke, Steven J ; Farrell, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><description>Fish released after capture, or fish interacting with gear but escaping, sometimes experience fishing-related incidental mortality (FRIM). For adult Pacific salmon migrations, knowing the magnitude of FRIM is important to estimate escapement accurately and to understand the total impact of a specific fishery. To determine how multiple gear types are associated with FRIM at different levels of maturity, we captured sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) by both gill net and beach seine at three locations along their migration route (10%, 26%, and 72% of a 500 km freshwater migration) and determined their migratory success using biotelemetry. FRIM was higher for fish captured by gill net except at the location closest to spawning grounds. In addition, salmon captured by gill net at the lower river locations temporarily delayed migration, potentially indicating a requirement for lengthier recovery time compared with beach-seined fish. These results provide the first empirical and parallel comparison of these two common in-river fishing methods for salmon, revealing clear differences in FRIM between the two fishing methods in lower river fisheries and the importance of maturity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0706-652X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1205-7533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Adults ; Anadromous migrations ; Beach seines ; Beaches ; Biotelemetry ; Capture-recapture studies ; Fish ; Fish migration ; Fisheries ; Fishery research ; Fishing ; Fishing gear ; Fishing nets ; Freshwater ; Gillnets ; Gillnetting ; Migration ; Migratory fishes ; Migratory species ; Mortality ; Oncorhynchus nerka ; Recovery time ; River fisheries ; Rivers ; Salmon ; Salmon fisheries ; Salmoniformes ; Seining ; Sockeye salmon ; Sonic tags ; Spawning ; Spawning grounds ; Tagging ; Telemetry ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 2018-11, Vol.75 (11), p.2011-2023</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>2018 Published by NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-f0d7557d582fa6867119a1432307a15c935fe31f2d3f8eff5a03d092b2669a483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-f0d7557d582fa6867119a1432307a15c935fe31f2d3f8eff5a03d092b2669a483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bass, Arthur L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinch, Scott G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><title>Location-specific consequences of beach seine and gillnet capture on upriver-migrating sockeye salmon migration behavior and fate</title><title>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</title><description>Fish released after capture, or fish interacting with gear but escaping, sometimes experience fishing-related incidental mortality (FRIM). For adult Pacific salmon migrations, knowing the magnitude of FRIM is important to estimate escapement accurately and to understand the total impact of a specific fishery. To determine how multiple gear types are associated with FRIM at different levels of maturity, we captured sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) by both gill net and beach seine at three locations along their migration route (10%, 26%, and 72% of a 500 km freshwater migration) and determined their migratory success using biotelemetry. FRIM was higher for fish captured by gill net except at the location closest to spawning grounds. In addition, salmon captured by gill net at the lower river locations temporarily delayed migration, potentially indicating a requirement for lengthier recovery time compared with beach-seined fish. These results provide the first empirical and parallel comparison of these two common in-river fishing methods for salmon, revealing clear differences in FRIM between the two fishing methods in lower river fisheries and the importance of maturity.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Anadromous migrations</subject><subject>Beach seines</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Biotelemetry</subject><subject>Capture-recapture studies</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish migration</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishery research</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing gear</subject><subject>Fishing nets</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Gillnets</subject><subject>Gillnetting</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Migratory fishes</subject><subject>Migratory species</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus nerka</subject><subject>Recovery time</subject><subject>River fisheries</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Salmon fisheries</subject><subject>Salmoniformes</subject><subject>Seining</subject><subject>Sockeye salmon</subject><subject>Sonic tags</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Spawning grounds</subject><subject>Tagging</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>0706-652X</issn><issn>1205-7533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVks9rFDEUxwdRcK2evQY9eUibH5PJzLEUfxQWBX-At_A28zLNOpNsk5lij_7nZtuCLiyC5JDw8sn3kcenql5ydsq57M7s1kGmgnFNWa3rR9WKC6aoVlI-rlZMs4Y2Snx_Wj3LecsYF4qzVfVrHS3MPgaad2i985bYGDJeLxgsZhId2SDYK5LRByQQejL4cQw4Ewu7eUlIYiDLLvkbTHTyQyppYSA52h94iyTDOBXg4aKcNngFNz6muygHMz6vnjgYM7542E-qb-_efr34QNef3l9enK-prTs9U8d6rZTuVSscNG2jOe-A11JIpoEr20nlUHIneuladE4Bkz3rxEY0TQd1K0-q1_e5uxTL7_JstnFJobQ0QtS6a1VTRvUvqoyMMVUa_qEGGNH44OKcwE4-W3OuGiY5V_U-ix6hBgyYYIwBnS_lA_7VEd7u_LX5Gzo9ApXV4-Tt0dQ3Bw8KM-PPeYAlZ3P55fN_sB8P2bN71qaYc0JnigQTpFvDmdkbae6MNHsjzd5I-Rvei9Bg</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Bass, Arthur L</creator><creator>Hinch, Scott G</creator><creator>Patterson, David A</creator><creator>Cooke, Steven J</creator><creator>Farrell, Anthony P</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Location-specific consequences of beach seine and gillnet capture on upriver-migrating sockeye salmon migration behavior and fate</title><author>Bass, Arthur L ; Hinch, Scott G ; Patterson, David A ; Cooke, Steven J ; Farrell, Anthony P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-f0d7557d582fa6867119a1432307a15c935fe31f2d3f8eff5a03d092b2669a483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Anadromous migrations</topic><topic>Beach seines</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Biotelemetry</topic><topic>Capture-recapture studies</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish migration</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishery research</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing gear</topic><topic>Fishing nets</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Gillnets</topic><topic>Gillnetting</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Migratory fishes</topic><topic>Migratory species</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus nerka</topic><topic>Recovery time</topic><topic>River fisheries</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Salmon fisheries</topic><topic>Salmoniformes</topic><topic>Seining</topic><topic>Sockeye salmon</topic><topic>Sonic tags</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Spawning grounds</topic><topic>Tagging</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bass, Arthur L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinch, Scott G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrell, Anthony P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bass, Arthur L</au><au>Hinch, Scott G</au><au>Patterson, David A</au><au>Cooke, Steven J</au><au>Farrell, Anthony P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Location-specific consequences of beach seine and gillnet capture on upriver-migrating sockeye salmon migration behavior and fate</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2011</spage><epage>2023</epage><pages>2011-2023</pages><issn>0706-652X</issn><eissn>1205-7533</eissn><abstract>Fish released after capture, or fish interacting with gear but escaping, sometimes experience fishing-related incidental mortality (FRIM). For adult Pacific salmon migrations, knowing the magnitude of FRIM is important to estimate escapement accurately and to understand the total impact of a specific fishery. To determine how multiple gear types are associated with FRIM at different levels of maturity, we captured sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) by both gill net and beach seine at three locations along their migration route (10%, 26%, and 72% of a 500 km freshwater migration) and determined their migratory success using biotelemetry. FRIM was higher for fish captured by gill net except at the location closest to spawning grounds. In addition, salmon captured by gill net at the lower river locations temporarily delayed migration, potentially indicating a requirement for lengthier recovery time compared with beach-seined fish. These results provide the first empirical and parallel comparison of these two common in-river fishing methods for salmon, revealing clear differences in FRIM between the two fishing methods in lower river fisheries and the importance of maturity.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/cjfas-2017-0474</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0706-652X
ispartof Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 2018-11, Vol.75 (11), p.2011-2023
issn 0706-652X
1205-7533
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2247985653
source Canadian Science Publishing (NRC Research Press) Current
subjects Adults
Anadromous migrations
Beach seines
Beaches
Biotelemetry
Capture-recapture studies
Fish
Fish migration
Fisheries
Fishery research
Fishing
Fishing gear
Fishing nets
Freshwater
Gillnets
Gillnetting
Migration
Migratory fishes
Migratory species
Mortality
Oncorhynchus nerka
Recovery time
River fisheries
Rivers
Salmon
Salmon fisheries
Salmoniformes
Seining
Sockeye salmon
Sonic tags
Spawning
Spawning grounds
Tagging
Telemetry
Tracking
title Location-specific consequences of beach seine and gillnet capture on upriver-migrating sockeye salmon migration behavior and fate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Location-specific%20consequences%20of%20beach%20seine%20and%20gillnet%20capture%20on%20upriver-migrating%20sockeye%20salmon%20migration%20behavior%20and%20fate&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20and%20aquatic%20sciences&rft.au=Bass,%20Arthur%20L&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2011&rft.epage=2023&rft.pages=2011-2023&rft.issn=0706-652X&rft.eissn=1205-7533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0474&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA560311543%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-f0d7557d582fa6867119a1432307a15c935fe31f2d3f8eff5a03d092b2669a483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125005230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A560311543&rfr_iscdi=true