How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study

Idioms are a compelling subject of study for linguists, lexicographers and psycholinguists due to their seemingly idiosyncratic status as lexical units that pose challenges for integration into accepted grammatical frameworks. The literature reveals much disagreement on the semantic compositionality...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics 2019-07, Vol.57 (4), p.735-767
Main Author: Fellbaum, Christiane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Compositionality
corpus data
Corpus linguistics
English language
flexibility
German language
Idioms
Lexical semantics
Psycholinguistics
Semantics
Syntax
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c53886322234fc6c5bcb0288d5a063dd513f308af8d94ee6ef6d00ae13fece2c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c53886322234fc6c5bcb0288d5a063dd513f308af8d94ee6ef6d00ae13fece2c3
container_end_page 767
container_issue 4
container_start_page 735
container_title Linguistics
container_volume 57
creator Fellbaum, Christiane
description Idioms are a compelling subject of study for linguists, lexicographers and psycholinguists due to their seemingly idiosyncratic status as lexical units that pose challenges for integration into accepted grammatical frameworks. The literature reveals much disagreement on the semantic compositionality, syntactic flexibility and lexical variation of both specific idioms and idioms as a class. We analyze some of the sources for the disparate analyses, which are most often based on judgments of constructed rather than attested examples. Relying solely on corpus data from English and German that shows a wide range of syntactic and lexical variation independent of semantic compositionality, we argue that speakers’ use of idioms is in fact compatible with the rules governing freely composed language.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/ling-2019-0015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2249152886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2249152886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c53886322234fc6c5bcb0288d5a063dd513f308af8d94ee6ef6d00ae13fece2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsEavngOet85-NgFBSlErFLwoeFs2u7MlJW3qbkLtvzehghdP8zLM8w48hNwymDLF1H1T79aUAyspAFNnZMI0E1SU-vOcTAC4HLIsL8lVShsAkGLGJ4Qu20MeGvyuqwZzGzGvfd1u02M-z10b932ilU3o89T1_nhNLoJtEt78zox8PD-9L5Z09fbyupivqBMcOuqUKAotOOdCBqedqlwFvCi8sqCF94qJIKCwofClRNQYtAewOKzRIXciI3en3n1sv3pMndm0fdwNLw3nsmSKj_0ZmZ6uXGxTihjMPtZbG4-GgRmVmFGJGZWYUckAPJyAg206jB7XsT8O4a_9f1DN5Ewo8QNOtmc_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2249152886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Fellbaum, Christiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellbaum, Christiane</creatorcontrib><description>Idioms are a compelling subject of study for linguists, lexicographers and psycholinguists due to their seemingly idiosyncratic status as lexical units that pose challenges for integration into accepted grammatical frameworks. The literature reveals much disagreement on the semantic compositionality, syntactic flexibility and lexical variation of both specific idioms and idioms as a class. We analyze some of the sources for the disparate analyses, which are most often based on judgments of constructed rather than attested examples. Relying solely on corpus data from English and German that shows a wide range of syntactic and lexical variation independent of semantic compositionality, we argue that speakers’ use of idioms is in fact compatible with the rules governing freely composed language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-396X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ling-2019-0015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Compositionality ; corpus data ; Corpus linguistics ; English language ; flexibility ; German language ; Idioms ; Lexical semantics ; Psycholinguistics ; Semantics ; Syntax</subject><ispartof>Linguistics, 2019-07, Vol.57 (4), p.735-767</ispartof><rights>Copyright Walter de Gruyter GmbH Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c53886322234fc6c5bcb0288d5a063dd513f308af8d94ee6ef6d00ae13fece2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c53886322234fc6c5bcb0288d5a063dd513f308af8d94ee6ef6d00ae13fece2c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,31268</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellbaum, Christiane</creatorcontrib><title>How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study</title><title>Linguistics</title><description>Idioms are a compelling subject of study for linguists, lexicographers and psycholinguists due to their seemingly idiosyncratic status as lexical units that pose challenges for integration into accepted grammatical frameworks. The literature reveals much disagreement on the semantic compositionality, syntactic flexibility and lexical variation of both specific idioms and idioms as a class. We analyze some of the sources for the disparate analyses, which are most often based on judgments of constructed rather than attested examples. Relying solely on corpus data from English and German that shows a wide range of syntactic and lexical variation independent of semantic compositionality, we argue that speakers’ use of idioms is in fact compatible with the rules governing freely composed language.</description><subject>Compositionality</subject><subject>corpus data</subject><subject>Corpus linguistics</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>flexibility</subject><subject>German language</subject><subject>Idioms</subject><subject>Lexical semantics</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><issn>0024-3949</issn><issn>1613-396X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsEavngOet85-NgFBSlErFLwoeFs2u7MlJW3qbkLtvzehghdP8zLM8w48hNwymDLF1H1T79aUAyspAFNnZMI0E1SU-vOcTAC4HLIsL8lVShsAkGLGJ4Qu20MeGvyuqwZzGzGvfd1u02M-z10b932ilU3o89T1_nhNLoJtEt78zox8PD-9L5Z09fbyupivqBMcOuqUKAotOOdCBqedqlwFvCi8sqCF94qJIKCwofClRNQYtAewOKzRIXciI3en3n1sv3pMndm0fdwNLw3nsmSKj_0ZmZ6uXGxTihjMPtZbG4-GgRmVmFGJGZWYUckAPJyAg206jB7XsT8O4a_9f1DN5Ewo8QNOtmc_</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Fellbaum, Christiane</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study</title><author>Fellbaum, Christiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c53886322234fc6c5bcb0288d5a063dd513f308af8d94ee6ef6d00ae13fece2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Compositionality</topic><topic>corpus data</topic><topic>Corpus linguistics</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>flexibility</topic><topic>German language</topic><topic>Idioms</topic><topic>Lexical semantics</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellbaum, Christiane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellbaum, Christiane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>735</spage><epage>767</epage><pages>735-767</pages><issn>0024-3949</issn><eissn>1613-396X</eissn><abstract>Idioms are a compelling subject of study for linguists, lexicographers and psycholinguists due to their seemingly idiosyncratic status as lexical units that pose challenges for integration into accepted grammatical frameworks. The literature reveals much disagreement on the semantic compositionality, syntactic flexibility and lexical variation of both specific idioms and idioms as a class. We analyze some of the sources for the disparate analyses, which are most often based on judgments of constructed rather than attested examples. Relying solely on corpus data from English and German that shows a wide range of syntactic and lexical variation independent of semantic compositionality, we argue that speakers’ use of idioms is in fact compatible with the rules governing freely composed language.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/ling-2019-0015</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3949
ispartof Linguistics, 2019-07, Vol.57 (4), p.735-767
issn 0024-3949
1613-396X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2249152886
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Compositionality
corpus data
Corpus linguistics
English language
flexibility
German language
Idioms
Lexical semantics
Psycholinguistics
Semantics
Syntax
title How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T17%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20flexible%20are%20idioms?%20A%20corpus-based%20study&rft.jtitle=Linguistics&rft.au=Fellbaum,%20Christiane&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=735&rft.epage=767&rft.pages=735-767&rft.issn=0024-3949&rft.eissn=1613-396X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ling-2019-0015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2249152886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-c53886322234fc6c5bcb0288d5a063dd513f308af8d94ee6ef6d00ae13fece2c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2249152886&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true