A catalog of spectroscopic binary candidate stars derived from a comparison of Gaia DR2 with other radial velocity catalogs

Using the recently published Gaia second data release that includes measurements of the mean radial velocity of about 7.2 million stars, we performed a systematic comparison with other existing radial velocity catalogs to search for variations in the radial velocity measurements, with the goal that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Astronomische Nachrichten 2019-06, Vol.340 (5), p.386-397
Main Author: Jack, Dennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
binaries: spectroscopic
Binary stars
Doppler effect
Radial velocity
Rain
Spectroscopy
Stars
techniques: radial velocities
Velocity
Weights & measures
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Using the recently published Gaia second data release that includes measurements of the mean radial velocity of about 7.2 million stars, we performed a systematic comparison with other existing radial velocity catalogs to search for variations in the radial velocity measurements, with the goal that detected differences may indicate that these stars are possibly spectroscopic binary stars with only one visible component (SB1). We present a catalog of spectroscopic binary candidate stars containing 35,246 stars, compiled to encourage follow‐up observations obtaining spectra at different epochs of orbits of these stars to verify their binarity and to study these systems using radial velocity curves. Comparing the Gaia DR2 database with the K‐M dwarf catalog, we found 16 stars that show radial velocity variations. In a comparison with the Pulkovo radial velocity catalog of Hipparcos stars, we identified a total of 539 SB1 candidate stars. In the largest radial velocity catalog available, the radial velocity experiment (RAVE) catalog, we found a total of 34,691 stars that show radial velocity variations when compared to the Gaia DR2 data.
ISSN:0004-6337
1521-3994
DOI:10.1002/asna.201913496