Learning opportunities in rheumatology practice: a qualitative study

• Published in: The journal of workplace learning 2015-01, Vol.27 (4), p.282-297
• Main Authors: Neher, Margit Saskia, Ståhl, Christian, Nilsen, Per
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Barriers; Behavioral Objectives; Classification; Collaborative relationships; Content analysis; Continuing professional development; Curricula; Data Analysis; Data collection; Education; Educational Opportunities; Foreign Countries; Health care; HR & organizational behaviour; Informal Education; Interviews; Leadership; Learning; Learning Processes; Medical Education; Medicine; Professionals; Qualitative Research; Rheumatology; Sweden; Tacit knowledge; Teaching Methods; Training & development; Workplace Learning
• ISSN: 1366-5626; 1758-7859; 1758-7859
• DOI: 10.1108/JWL-07-2014-0054

Purpose – This paper aims to explore what opportunities for learning practitioners in rheumatology perceive of in their daily practice, using a typology of workplace learning to categorize these opportunities. Design/methodology/approach – Thirty-six practitioners from different professions in rheumatology were interviewed. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis with a directed approach, and were categorized according to a typology of formal and informal learning. Findings – The typology was adjusted to fit the categories resulting from the analysis. Further analysis showed that work processes with learning as a by-product in general, and relationships with other people in the workplace in particular, were perceived as important for learning in the workplace. The use of many recognized learning opportunities was lower. Barriers for learning were a perceived low leadership awareness of learning opportunities and factors relating to workload and the organization of work. Research limitations/implications – The generalizability of results from all qualitative inquiries is limited by nature, and the issue of transferability to other contexts is for the reader to decide. Further studies will need to confirm the results of the study, as well as the proposed enhancement of the typology with which the results were categorized. Practical implications – The study highlights the importance of relationships in the workplace for informal learning in rheumatology practice. In the clinical context, locally adapted strategies at organizational and individual levels are needed to maximize opportunities for both professional and interprofessional informal learning, taking the importance of personal relationships into account. The findings also suggest a need for increased continuing professional education in the specialty. Originality/value – The workplace learning typology that was used in the study showed good applicability to empirical health-care study data, but may need further development. The study confirmed that informal workplace learning is an important part of learning in rheumatology. Further studies are needed to clarify how informal and formal learning in the rheumatology clinic may be supported in workplaces with different characteristics.