Loading…

Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research

This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Systems research and behavioral science 2019-07, Vol.36 (4), p.494-513
Main Authors: Luna‐Reyes, Luis F., Black, Laura J., Ran, Weijia, Andersen, Deborah Lines, Jarman, Holly, Richardson, George P., Andersen, David F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3
container_end_page 513
container_issue 4
container_start_page 494
container_title Systems research and behavioral science
container_volume 36
creator Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.
Black, Laura J.
Ran, Weijia
Andersen, Deborah Lines
Jarman, Holly
Richardson, George P.
Andersen, David F.
description This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sres.2564
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2250895025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2250895025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PAjEQhhujiYge_AdNPHlYmE73gz0qASXBkACem27b1ZJlF9tuCP_eXfDqaebwvO9MHkIeGYwYAI69M36ESRpfkQGDPI9YFvPr845RBpjekjvvdwAMGGMDsv1otKls_UVlrenG7ttKBtvUVHr62rS1lu5EV8XOqOBpaOhcKlvZIIOhizoYp61X9tAV9NzaeCOd-r4nN6WsvHn4m0PyOZ9tp-_RcvW2mL4sI8U5xpGWRQ6q4IgIxsiJxiRRGXDMshJ5KTtKl2kWI-dKA-eSMaU45DEWuixTxYfk6dJ7cM1Pa3wQu6Z1dXdSICYwyRPApKOeL5Ryje_8lOLg7L77VzAQvTTRSxO9tI4dX9ijrczpf1Bs1rPNOfEL7cVvIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250895025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F. ; Black, Laura J. ; Ran, Weijia ; Andersen, Deborah Lines ; Jarman, Holly ; Richardson, George P. ; Andersen, David F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F. ; Black, Laura J. ; Ran, Weijia ; Andersen, Deborah Lines ; Jarman, Holly ; Richardson, George P. ; Andersen, David F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sres.2564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>boundary objects ; Computer simulation ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Interdisciplinary research ; Interdisciplinary studies ; Modelling ; participatory modelling ; Qualitative analysis ; Researchers ; Simulation ; system dynamics ; Theory ; theory building</subject><ispartof>Systems research and behavioral science, 2019-07, Vol.36 (4), p.494-513</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0852-404X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33204</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Weijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Deborah Lines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarman, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, George P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, David F.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</title><title>Systems research and behavioral science</title><description>This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>boundary objects</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary studies</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>participatory modelling</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>system dynamics</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>theory building</subject><issn>1092-7026</issn><issn>1099-1743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PAjEQhhujiYge_AdNPHlYmE73gz0qASXBkACem27b1ZJlF9tuCP_eXfDqaebwvO9MHkIeGYwYAI69M36ESRpfkQGDPI9YFvPr845RBpjekjvvdwAMGGMDsv1otKls_UVlrenG7ttKBtvUVHr62rS1lu5EV8XOqOBpaOhcKlvZIIOhizoYp61X9tAV9NzaeCOd-r4nN6WsvHn4m0PyOZ9tp-_RcvW2mL4sI8U5xpGWRQ6q4IgIxsiJxiRRGXDMshJ5KTtKl2kWI-dKA-eSMaU45DEWuixTxYfk6dJ7cM1Pa3wQu6Z1dXdSICYwyRPApKOeL5Ryje_8lOLg7L77VzAQvTTRSxO9tI4dX9ijrczpf1Bs1rPNOfEL7cVvIg</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</creator><creator>Black, Laura J.</creator><creator>Ran, Weijia</creator><creator>Andersen, Deborah Lines</creator><creator>Jarman, Holly</creator><creator>Richardson, George P.</creator><creator>Andersen, David F.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-404X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</title><author>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F. ; Black, Laura J. ; Ran, Weijia ; Andersen, Deborah Lines ; Jarman, Holly ; Richardson, George P. ; Andersen, David F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>boundary objects</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary studies</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>participatory modelling</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>system dynamics</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>theory building</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Weijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Deborah Lines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarman, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, George P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, David F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</au><au>Black, Laura J.</au><au>Ran, Weijia</au><au>Andersen, Deborah Lines</au><au>Jarman, Holly</au><au>Richardson, George P.</au><au>Andersen, David F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</atitle><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>513</epage><pages>494-513</pages><issn>1092-7026</issn><eissn>1099-1743</eissn><abstract>This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sres.2564</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-404X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-7026
ispartof Systems research and behavioral science, 2019-07, Vol.36 (4), p.494-513
issn 1092-7026
1099-1743
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2250895025
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley
subjects boundary objects
Computer simulation
Interdisciplinary aspects
Interdisciplinary research
Interdisciplinary studies
Modelling
participatory modelling
Qualitative analysis
Researchers
Simulation
system dynamics
Theory
theory building
title Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T18%3A00%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20and%20Simulation%20as%20Boundary%20Objects%20to%20Facilitate%20Interdisciplinary%20Research&rft.jtitle=Systems%20research%20and%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Luna%E2%80%90Reyes,%20Luis%20F.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=513&rft.pages=494-513&rft.issn=1092-7026&rft.eissn=1099-1743&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sres.2564&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2250895025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250895025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true