Loading…
Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research
This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Systems research and behavioral science 2019-07, Vol.36 (4), p.494-513 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3 |
container_end_page | 513 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 494 |
container_title | Systems research and behavioral science |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Luna‐Reyes, Luis F. Black, Laura J. Ran, Weijia Andersen, Deborah Lines Jarman, Holly Richardson, George P. Andersen, David F. |
description | This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sres.2564 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2250895025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2250895025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PAjEQhhujiYge_AdNPHlYmE73gz0qASXBkACem27b1ZJlF9tuCP_eXfDqaebwvO9MHkIeGYwYAI69M36ESRpfkQGDPI9YFvPr845RBpjekjvvdwAMGGMDsv1otKls_UVlrenG7ttKBtvUVHr62rS1lu5EV8XOqOBpaOhcKlvZIIOhizoYp61X9tAV9NzaeCOd-r4nN6WsvHn4m0PyOZ9tp-_RcvW2mL4sI8U5xpGWRQ6q4IgIxsiJxiRRGXDMshJ5KTtKl2kWI-dKA-eSMaU45DEWuixTxYfk6dJ7cM1Pa3wQu6Z1dXdSICYwyRPApKOeL5Ryje_8lOLg7L77VzAQvTTRSxO9tI4dX9ijrczpf1Bs1rPNOfEL7cVvIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250895025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F. ; Black, Laura J. ; Ran, Weijia ; Andersen, Deborah Lines ; Jarman, Holly ; Richardson, George P. ; Andersen, David F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F. ; Black, Laura J. ; Ran, Weijia ; Andersen, Deborah Lines ; Jarman, Holly ; Richardson, George P. ; Andersen, David F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sres.2564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>boundary objects ; Computer simulation ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Interdisciplinary research ; Interdisciplinary studies ; Modelling ; participatory modelling ; Qualitative analysis ; Researchers ; Simulation ; system dynamics ; Theory ; theory building</subject><ispartof>Systems research and behavioral science, 2019-07, Vol.36 (4), p.494-513</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0852-404X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33204</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Weijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Deborah Lines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarman, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, George P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, David F.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</title><title>Systems research and behavioral science</title><description>This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>boundary objects</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary studies</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>participatory modelling</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>system dynamics</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>theory building</subject><issn>1092-7026</issn><issn>1099-1743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PAjEQhhujiYge_AdNPHlYmE73gz0qASXBkACem27b1ZJlF9tuCP_eXfDqaebwvO9MHkIeGYwYAI69M36ESRpfkQGDPI9YFvPr845RBpjekjvvdwAMGGMDsv1otKls_UVlrenG7ttKBtvUVHr62rS1lu5EV8XOqOBpaOhcKlvZIIOhizoYp61X9tAV9NzaeCOd-r4nN6WsvHn4m0PyOZ9tp-_RcvW2mL4sI8U5xpGWRQ6q4IgIxsiJxiRRGXDMshJ5KTtKl2kWI-dKA-eSMaU45DEWuixTxYfk6dJ7cM1Pa3wQu6Z1dXdSICYwyRPApKOeL5Ryje_8lOLg7L77VzAQvTTRSxO9tI4dX9ijrczpf1Bs1rPNOfEL7cVvIg</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</creator><creator>Black, Laura J.</creator><creator>Ran, Weijia</creator><creator>Andersen, Deborah Lines</creator><creator>Jarman, Holly</creator><creator>Richardson, George P.</creator><creator>Andersen, David F.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-404X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</title><author>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F. ; Black, Laura J. ; Ran, Weijia ; Andersen, Deborah Lines ; Jarman, Holly ; Richardson, George P. ; Andersen, David F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>boundary objects</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary studies</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>participatory modelling</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>system dynamics</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>theory building</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Weijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Deborah Lines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarman, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, George P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, David F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luna‐Reyes, Luis F.</au><au>Black, Laura J.</au><au>Ran, Weijia</au><au>Andersen, Deborah Lines</au><au>Jarman, Holly</au><au>Richardson, George P.</au><au>Andersen, David F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research</atitle><jtitle>Systems research and behavioral science</jtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>513</epage><pages>494-513</pages><issn>1092-7026</issn><eissn>1099-1743</eissn><abstract>This paper describes Group Model Building (GMB) as an effective tool to bring together teams of researchers from different disciplines in theory‐building efforts. We propose that the simulation models, as well as other artefacts used during the modelling process, work as boundary objects useful to facilitate conversations among researchers of different disciplines, uncover insights, and build consensus on causal connections and actionable insights. In addition to providing a more robust theoretical basis for participatory system modelling as an approach to theory development in interdisciplinary work, we describe a study using GMB that illustrates its use. The assessment of the case suggests that system models provide interdisciplinary teams with opportunity to combine the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches to express theoretical issues, using an analytical meta‐language that permits iteratively building theory and testing its internal consistency. Moreover, the GMB process helps researchers navigate the tension between achieving interdisciplinary consensus (which often involves adding details) and building a parsimonious theory of the phenomenon under study. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sres.2564</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-404X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7026 |
ispartof | Systems research and behavioral science, 2019-07, Vol.36 (4), p.494-513 |
issn | 1092-7026 1099-1743 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2250895025 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley |
subjects | boundary objects Computer simulation Interdisciplinary aspects Interdisciplinary research Interdisciplinary studies Modelling participatory modelling Qualitative analysis Researchers Simulation system dynamics Theory theory building |
title | Modeling and Simulation as Boundary Objects to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T18%3A00%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20and%20Simulation%20as%20Boundary%20Objects%20to%20Facilitate%20Interdisciplinary%20Research&rft.jtitle=Systems%20research%20and%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Luna%E2%80%90Reyes,%20Luis%20F.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=513&rft.pages=494-513&rft.issn=1092-7026&rft.eissn=1099-1743&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sres.2564&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2250895025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-dab90cb32220eea8d255c703277f23fac33df674233cd033a11cc30942bdff6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250895025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |