Loading…

A Model of the Uncertainty Effects in Choice Reaction Time That Includes a Major Contribution From Effector Selection

Hick's law describes the relation between choice reaction time (RT) and the number of stimulus-response alternatives (NA). For over half a century, this uncertainty effect has been ascribed primarily to the time taken to map a stimulus to its associated response. Here, data from 2 experiments s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological review 2019-07, Vol.126 (4), p.550-577
Main Authors: Wright, Charles E, Marino, Valerie F, Chubb, Charles, Mann, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-6b3c8bd837e1014ae40fbda66e8ffe48a39276ac7e16e9036b59c9aa6aa6f9dd3
cites
container_end_page 577
container_issue 4
container_start_page 550
container_title Psychological review
container_volume 126
creator Wright, Charles E
Marino, Valerie F
Chubb, Charles
Mann, Daniel
description Hick's law describes the relation between choice reaction time (RT) and the number of stimulus-response alternatives (NA). For over half a century, this uncertainty effect has been ascribed primarily to the time taken to map a stimulus to its associated response. Here, data from 2 experiments suggests that selection of the appropriate effector-the particular body part to make a response-also contributes substantially to the uncertainty effect. This insight is important both for our understanding of basic cognitive architecture and because many classic experiments studying stimulus-response mapping have confounded NA with the number of effectors. Our data also suggest that, when stimuli are spatial and linked to the responses in an intuitively simple layout, the time required for stimulus-response mapping depends minimally on the NA, independent of effector. Experiment 1 demonstrated that in order to account for the complex patterns of uncertainty effects observed when stimulus type (spatial vs. symbolic), response mode (typing, with multiple effectors vs. touching with a single, known effector), and participant population (skilled vs. novice typists) are all manipulated a model is required that includes effector selection, along with stimulus-response mapping, and a proper treatment of stimulus-response repetitions. Using spatial indicator stimuli that minimized the contributions of stimulus-response mapping, Experiment 2 compared 4 effector conditions-the factorial combination of 1 or 3 fingers on one or both hands. The results showed that the increase in the uncertainty effect associated with the number of effectors is negatively accelerated and possibly additive across the variation of hands and fingers.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/rev0000146
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2251695910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2251695910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-6b3c8bd837e1014ae40fbda66e8ffe48a39276ac7e16e9036b59c9aa6aa6f9dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun5c_AES8CZWk6ZNm6Ms6wcogq7gLUzTKdul26xJKuy_N-6uenMIzGGePCHvEHLK2RVnorh2-Mli8UzukBFXQiU8K_guGTEmRJKq_P2AHHo_X0NK7ZMDwVnJZVaMyHBDn2yNHbUNDTOkb71BF6Dtw4pOmgZN8LTt6XhmW4P0BcGE1vZ02i6QTmcQ6ENvuqFGT4E-wdw6OrZ9cG01rLlbZxdbTxy9Yofr-8dkr4HO48m2H5G328l0fJ88Pt89jG8eExClCImshCmruhQF8vg9wIw1VQ1SYhmVWQlCpYUEE8cSFROyypVRADKeRtW1OCLnG-_S2Y8BfdBzO7g-PqnTNOdS5Som-C-VClUKnheRuthQxlnvHTZ66doFuJXmTH_vQf_tIcJnW-VQLbD-RX-Cj8DlBoAl6KVfGXChNR16MziHffiWaZ5Knek8Z-ILvQmSqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2223983157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Model of the Uncertainty Effects in Choice Reaction Time That Includes a Major Contribution From Effector Selection</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Wright, Charles E ; Marino, Valerie F ; Chubb, Charles ; Mann, Daniel</creator><contributor>Holyoak, Keith J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wright, Charles E ; Marino, Valerie F ; Chubb, Charles ; Mann, Daniel ; Holyoak, Keith J</creatorcontrib><description>Hick's law describes the relation between choice reaction time (RT) and the number of stimulus-response alternatives (NA). For over half a century, this uncertainty effect has been ascribed primarily to the time taken to map a stimulus to its associated response. Here, data from 2 experiments suggests that selection of the appropriate effector-the particular body part to make a response-also contributes substantially to the uncertainty effect. This insight is important both for our understanding of basic cognitive architecture and because many classic experiments studying stimulus-response mapping have confounded NA with the number of effectors. Our data also suggest that, when stimuli are spatial and linked to the responses in an intuitively simple layout, the time required for stimulus-response mapping depends minimally on the NA, independent of effector. Experiment 1 demonstrated that in order to account for the complex patterns of uncertainty effects observed when stimulus type (spatial vs. symbolic), response mode (typing, with multiple effectors vs. touching with a single, known effector), and participant population (skilled vs. novice typists) are all manipulated a model is required that includes effector selection, along with stimulus-response mapping, and a proper treatment of stimulus-response repetitions. Using spatial indicator stimuli that minimized the contributions of stimulus-response mapping, Experiment 2 compared 4 effector conditions-the factorial combination of 1 or 3 fingers on one or both hands. The results showed that the increase in the uncertainty effect associated with the number of effectors is negatively accelerated and possibly additive across the variation of hands and fingers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-295X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/rev0000146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31081647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ascription ; Biological organs ; Cells ; Choice Behavior ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Female ; Fingers ; Hands ; Human ; Humans ; Keyboarding ; Layout ; Male ; Mapping ; Models, Psychological ; Physical Contact ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Responses ; Stimulus ; Test Construction ; Touch ; Typists ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Psychological review, 2019-07, Vol.126 (4), p.550-577</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-6b3c8bd837e1014ae40fbda66e8ffe48a39276ac7e16e9036b59c9aa6aa6f9dd3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6745-7991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31081647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Holyoak, Keith J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wright, Charles E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Valerie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chubb, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>A Model of the Uncertainty Effects in Choice Reaction Time That Includes a Major Contribution From Effector Selection</title><title>Psychological review</title><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Hick's law describes the relation between choice reaction time (RT) and the number of stimulus-response alternatives (NA). For over half a century, this uncertainty effect has been ascribed primarily to the time taken to map a stimulus to its associated response. Here, data from 2 experiments suggests that selection of the appropriate effector-the particular body part to make a response-also contributes substantially to the uncertainty effect. This insight is important both for our understanding of basic cognitive architecture and because many classic experiments studying stimulus-response mapping have confounded NA with the number of effectors. Our data also suggest that, when stimuli are spatial and linked to the responses in an intuitively simple layout, the time required for stimulus-response mapping depends minimally on the NA, independent of effector. Experiment 1 demonstrated that in order to account for the complex patterns of uncertainty effects observed when stimulus type (spatial vs. symbolic), response mode (typing, with multiple effectors vs. touching with a single, known effector), and participant population (skilled vs. novice typists) are all manipulated a model is required that includes effector selection, along with stimulus-response mapping, and a proper treatment of stimulus-response repetitions. Using spatial indicator stimuli that minimized the contributions of stimulus-response mapping, Experiment 2 compared 4 effector conditions-the factorial combination of 1 or 3 fingers on one or both hands. The results showed that the increase in the uncertainty effect associated with the number of effectors is negatively accelerated and possibly additive across the variation of hands and fingers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ascription</subject><subject>Biological organs</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Hands</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keyboarding</subject><subject>Layout</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Physical Contact</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Touch</subject><subject>Typists</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0033-295X</issn><issn>1939-1471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun5c_AES8CZWk6ZNm6Ms6wcogq7gLUzTKdul26xJKuy_N-6uenMIzGGePCHvEHLK2RVnorh2-Mli8UzukBFXQiU8K_guGTEmRJKq_P2AHHo_X0NK7ZMDwVnJZVaMyHBDn2yNHbUNDTOkb71BF6Dtw4pOmgZN8LTt6XhmW4P0BcGE1vZ02i6QTmcQ6ENvuqFGT4E-wdw6OrZ9cG01rLlbZxdbTxy9Yofr-8dkr4HO48m2H5G328l0fJ88Pt89jG8eExClCImshCmruhQF8vg9wIw1VQ1SYhmVWQlCpYUEE8cSFROyypVRADKeRtW1OCLnG-_S2Y8BfdBzO7g-PqnTNOdS5Som-C-VClUKnheRuthQxlnvHTZ66doFuJXmTH_vQf_tIcJnW-VQLbD-RX-Cj8DlBoAl6KVfGXChNR16MziHffiWaZ5Knek8Z-ILvQmSqA</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Wright, Charles E</creator><creator>Marino, Valerie F</creator><creator>Chubb, Charles</creator><creator>Mann, Daniel</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6745-7991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>A Model of the Uncertainty Effects in Choice Reaction Time That Includes a Major Contribution From Effector Selection</title><author>Wright, Charles E ; Marino, Valerie F ; Chubb, Charles ; Mann, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-6b3c8bd837e1014ae40fbda66e8ffe48a39276ac7e16e9036b59c9aa6aa6f9dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ascription</topic><topic>Biological organs</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Hands</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keyboarding</topic><topic>Layout</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Physical Contact</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Touch</topic><topic>Typists</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, Charles E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Valerie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chubb, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, Charles E</au><au>Marino, Valerie F</au><au>Chubb, Charles</au><au>Mann, Daniel</au><au>Holyoak, Keith J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Model of the Uncertainty Effects in Choice Reaction Time That Includes a Major Contribution From Effector Selection</atitle><jtitle>Psychological review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>550-577</pages><issn>0033-295X</issn><eissn>1939-1471</eissn><abstract>Hick's law describes the relation between choice reaction time (RT) and the number of stimulus-response alternatives (NA). For over half a century, this uncertainty effect has been ascribed primarily to the time taken to map a stimulus to its associated response. Here, data from 2 experiments suggests that selection of the appropriate effector-the particular body part to make a response-also contributes substantially to the uncertainty effect. This insight is important both for our understanding of basic cognitive architecture and because many classic experiments studying stimulus-response mapping have confounded NA with the number of effectors. Our data also suggest that, when stimuli are spatial and linked to the responses in an intuitively simple layout, the time required for stimulus-response mapping depends minimally on the NA, independent of effector. Experiment 1 demonstrated that in order to account for the complex patterns of uncertainty effects observed when stimulus type (spatial vs. symbolic), response mode (typing, with multiple effectors vs. touching with a single, known effector), and participant population (skilled vs. novice typists) are all manipulated a model is required that includes effector selection, along with stimulus-response mapping, and a proper treatment of stimulus-response repetitions. Using spatial indicator stimuli that minimized the contributions of stimulus-response mapping, Experiment 2 compared 4 effector conditions-the factorial combination of 1 or 3 fingers on one or both hands. The results showed that the increase in the uncertainty effect associated with the number of effectors is negatively accelerated and possibly additive across the variation of hands and fingers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31081647</pmid><doi>10.1037/rev0000146</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6745-7991</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-295X
ispartof Psychological review, 2019-07, Vol.126 (4), p.550-577
issn 0033-295X
1939-1471
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2251695910
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Ascription
Biological organs
Cells
Choice Behavior
Choice Behavior - physiology
Female
Fingers
Hands
Human
Humans
Keyboarding
Layout
Male
Mapping
Models, Psychological
Physical Contact
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reaction Time
Reaction Time - physiology
Responses
Stimulus
Test Construction
Touch
Typists
Uncertainty
title A Model of the Uncertainty Effects in Choice Reaction Time That Includes a Major Contribution From Effector Selection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A45%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Model%20of%20the%20Uncertainty%20Effects%20in%20Choice%20Reaction%20Time%20That%20Includes%20a%20Major%20Contribution%20From%20Effector%20Selection&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20review&rft.au=Wright,%20Charles%20E&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=550-577&rft.issn=0033-295X&rft.eissn=1939-1471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/rev0000146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2251695910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a383t-6b3c8bd837e1014ae40fbda66e8ffe48a39276ac7e16e9036b59c9aa6aa6f9dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2223983157&rft_id=info:pmid/31081647&rfr_iscdi=true