Loading…

Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio

Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-eleme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mountain science 2019-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1629-1645
Main Authors: Song, Dong-ri, Zhou, Gordon G. D., Choi, Clarence Edward, Zheng, Yun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43
container_end_page 1645
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1629
container_title Journal of mountain science
container_volume 16
creator Song, Dong-ri
Zhou, Gordon G. D.
Choi, Clarence Edward
Zheng, Yun
description Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event, i.e. , low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2252770677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2252770677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9Ad5IPKMMLLDrzVSrJk286JnAAmabdllhG_XfS90mnjzNTHjvG-YhdAn0GihVNxlAsoZQqIngUBF5hGbQNJxQzuC49FIxIjnIU3SW85pSqZoaZsjce5u6jMMmfuJuO5h2xLEvo__q7MZja1LqfLrFPgTfjhnHgN2vhRyecB67EHqfMza9m0AmD0WMkxm7eI5Ogtlkf3Goc_S2fHhdPJHVy-Pz4m5F2vKrsdAqrxSjTlnHuK3rpnbcclGxIKXkzLXGKimYUBW0tBYenJcKJACvlDAVn6OriTuk-LHzedTruEt9WakZE0ypcrIqKphUbYo5Jx_0kLqtSd8aqN4nqackdUlS75PUsnjY5MlF27_79Ef-3_QDTHF1pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252770677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Song, Dong-ri ; Zhou, Gordon G. D. ; Choi, Clarence Edward ; Zheng, Yun</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Dong-ri ; Zhou, Gordon G. D. ; Choi, Clarence Edward ; Zheng, Yun</creatorcontrib><description>Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event, i.e. , low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-6316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-0321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1008-2786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Science Press</publisher><subject>Boulders ; Centrifuges ; Debris flow ; Detritus ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Elongation ; Environment ; Finite element method ; Geography ; Impact loads ; Kinetic energy ; Low aspect ratio ; Mathematical models ; Rockfall ; Shearing ; Stiffness</subject><ispartof>Journal of mountain science, 2019-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1629-1645</ispartof><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9712-1524 ; 0000-0001-9014-2931 ; 0000-0001-6375-6815 ; 0000-0001-6892-9770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Dong-ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Clarence Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yun</creatorcontrib><title>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</title><title>Journal of mountain science</title><addtitle>J. Mt. Sci</addtitle><description>Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event, i.e. , low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.</description><subject>Boulders</subject><subject>Centrifuges</subject><subject>Debris flow</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Impact loads</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Low aspect ratio</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Rockfall</subject><subject>Shearing</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><issn>1672-6316</issn><issn>1993-0321</issn><issn>1008-2786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9Ad5IPKMMLLDrzVSrJk286JnAAmabdllhG_XfS90mnjzNTHjvG-YhdAn0GihVNxlAsoZQqIngUBF5hGbQNJxQzuC49FIxIjnIU3SW85pSqZoaZsjce5u6jMMmfuJuO5h2xLEvo__q7MZja1LqfLrFPgTfjhnHgN2vhRyecB67EHqfMza9m0AmD0WMkxm7eI5Ogtlkf3Goc_S2fHhdPJHVy-Pz4m5F2vKrsdAqrxSjTlnHuK3rpnbcclGxIKXkzLXGKimYUBW0tBYenJcKJACvlDAVn6OriTuk-LHzedTruEt9WakZE0ypcrIqKphUbYo5Jx_0kLqtSd8aqN4nqackdUlS75PUsnjY5MlF27_79Ef-3_QDTHF1pQ</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Song, Dong-ri</creator><creator>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</creator><creator>Choi, Clarence Edward</creator><creator>Zheng, Yun</creator><general>Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-6815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-9770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</title><author>Song, Dong-ri ; Zhou, Gordon G. D. ; Choi, Clarence Edward ; Zheng, Yun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Boulders</topic><topic>Centrifuges</topic><topic>Debris flow</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Impact loads</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Low aspect ratio</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Rockfall</topic><topic>Shearing</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Dong-ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Clarence Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Dong-ri</au><au>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</au><au>Choi, Clarence Edward</au><au>Zheng, Yun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle><stitle>J. Mt. Sci</stitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1645</epage><pages>1629-1645</pages><issn>1672-6316</issn><eissn>1993-0321</eissn><eissn>1008-2786</eissn><abstract>Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event, i.e. , low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Science Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-6815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-9770</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1672-6316
ispartof Journal of mountain science, 2019-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1629-1645
issn 1672-6316
1993-0321
1008-2786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2252770677
source Springer Nature
subjects Boulders
Centrifuges
Debris flow
Detritus
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecology
Elongation
Environment
Finite element method
Geography
Impact loads
Kinetic energy
Low aspect ratio
Mathematical models
Rockfall
Shearing
Stiffness
title Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Debris%20flow%20impact%20on%20flexible%20barrier:%20effects%20of%20debris-barrier%20stiffness%20and%20flow%20aspect%20ratio&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mountain%20science&rft.au=Song,%20Dong-ri&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1645&rft.pages=1629-1645&rft.issn=1672-6316&rft.eissn=1993-0321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2252770677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252770677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true