Loading…
Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio
Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-eleme...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of mountain science 2019-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1629-1645 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43 |
container_end_page | 1645 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1629 |
container_title | Journal of mountain science |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Song, Dong-ri Zhou, Gordon G. D. Choi, Clarence Edward Zheng, Yun |
description | Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event,
i.e.
, low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2252770677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2252770677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9Ad5IPKMMLLDrzVSrJk286JnAAmabdllhG_XfS90mnjzNTHjvG-YhdAn0GihVNxlAsoZQqIngUBF5hGbQNJxQzuC49FIxIjnIU3SW85pSqZoaZsjce5u6jMMmfuJuO5h2xLEvo__q7MZja1LqfLrFPgTfjhnHgN2vhRyecB67EHqfMza9m0AmD0WMkxm7eI5Ogtlkf3Goc_S2fHhdPJHVy-Pz4m5F2vKrsdAqrxSjTlnHuK3rpnbcclGxIKXkzLXGKimYUBW0tBYenJcKJACvlDAVn6OriTuk-LHzedTruEt9WakZE0ypcrIqKphUbYo5Jx_0kLqtSd8aqN4nqackdUlS75PUsnjY5MlF27_79Ef-3_QDTHF1pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252770677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Song, Dong-ri ; Zhou, Gordon G. D. ; Choi, Clarence Edward ; Zheng, Yun</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Dong-ri ; Zhou, Gordon G. D. ; Choi, Clarence Edward ; Zheng, Yun</creatorcontrib><description>Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event,
i.e.
, low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-6316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-0321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1008-2786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Science Press</publisher><subject>Boulders ; Centrifuges ; Debris flow ; Detritus ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Elongation ; Environment ; Finite element method ; Geography ; Impact loads ; Kinetic energy ; Low aspect ratio ; Mathematical models ; Rockfall ; Shearing ; Stiffness</subject><ispartof>Journal of mountain science, 2019-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1629-1645</ispartof><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9712-1524 ; 0000-0001-9014-2931 ; 0000-0001-6375-6815 ; 0000-0001-6892-9770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Dong-ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Clarence Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yun</creatorcontrib><title>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</title><title>Journal of mountain science</title><addtitle>J. Mt. Sci</addtitle><description>Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event,
i.e.
, low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.</description><subject>Boulders</subject><subject>Centrifuges</subject><subject>Debris flow</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Impact loads</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Low aspect ratio</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Rockfall</subject><subject>Shearing</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><issn>1672-6316</issn><issn>1993-0321</issn><issn>1008-2786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9Ad5IPKMMLLDrzVSrJk286JnAAmabdllhG_XfS90mnjzNTHjvG-YhdAn0GihVNxlAsoZQqIngUBF5hGbQNJxQzuC49FIxIjnIU3SW85pSqZoaZsjce5u6jMMmfuJuO5h2xLEvo__q7MZja1LqfLrFPgTfjhnHgN2vhRyecB67EHqfMza9m0AmD0WMkxm7eI5Ogtlkf3Goc_S2fHhdPJHVy-Pz4m5F2vKrsdAqrxSjTlnHuK3rpnbcclGxIKXkzLXGKimYUBW0tBYenJcKJACvlDAVn6OriTuk-LHzedTruEt9WakZE0ypcrIqKphUbYo5Jx_0kLqtSd8aqN4nqackdUlS75PUsnjY5MlF27_79Ef-3_QDTHF1pQ</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Song, Dong-ri</creator><creator>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</creator><creator>Choi, Clarence Edward</creator><creator>Zheng, Yun</creator><general>Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-6815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-9770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</title><author>Song, Dong-ri ; Zhou, Gordon G. D. ; Choi, Clarence Edward ; Zheng, Yun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Boulders</topic><topic>Centrifuges</topic><topic>Debris flow</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Impact loads</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Low aspect ratio</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Rockfall</topic><topic>Shearing</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Dong-ri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Clarence Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Dong-ri</au><au>Zhou, Gordon G. D.</au><au>Choi, Clarence Edward</au><au>Zheng, Yun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle><stitle>J. Mt. Sci</stitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1645</epage><pages>1629-1645</pages><issn>1672-6316</issn><eissn>1993-0321</eissn><eissn>1008-2786</eissn><abstract>Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio (flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event,
i.e.
, low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Science Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-1524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-6815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-9770</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1672-6316 |
ispartof | Journal of mountain science, 2019-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1629-1645 |
issn | 1672-6316 1993-0321 1008-2786 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2252770677 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Boulders Centrifuges Debris flow Detritus Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Ecology Elongation Environment Finite element method Geography Impact loads Kinetic energy Low aspect ratio Mathematical models Rockfall Shearing Stiffness |
title | Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Debris%20flow%20impact%20on%20flexible%20barrier:%20effects%20of%20debris-barrier%20stiffness%20and%20flow%20aspect%20ratio&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mountain%20science&rft.au=Song,%20Dong-ri&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1645&rft.pages=1629-1645&rft.issn=1672-6316&rft.eissn=1993-0321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2252770677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-ba4e7720d7bd23b8898d3b3542f66632dcab76525741c085e1de6716113475a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252770677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |