THE INDONESIAN WAY: ASEAN, Europeanization, and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy

According to the author, the Indonesian "cognitive prior," which combines a realist inclination towards soft balancing, a mixture of entitlement and vulnerability, as well as antiliberal, organicist, and corporatist proclivities in state-society relations, can be traced back to the Majapah...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pacific affairs 2019, Vol.92 (2), p.401-403
Main Author: Martel, Stéphanie
Format: Review
Language:English
Subjects:
16th century
Debates
Democracy
Europeanization
Foreign policy
Localization
Nonfiction
Norms
Stakeholders
State-society relations
Supranationalism
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 403
container_issue 2
container_start_page 401
container_title Pacific affairs
container_volume 92
creator Martel, Stéphanie
description According to the author, the Indonesian "cognitive prior," which combines a realist inclination towards soft balancing, a mixture of entitlement and vulnerability, as well as antiliberal, organicist, and corporatist proclivities in state-society relations, can be traced back to the Majapahit Empire (1293-1500s). [...]it provides a longue durée analysis of localization, allowing for the possibility of reversal. By introducing three additional sets of actors (press, legislature, and business) and treating them as stakeholder groups in their own right, Rüland provides a more complete account of the foreign policy debate and offers a welcome glimpse into how their positions might not only extend beyond Indonesia to other ASEAN member states, but develop a truly regional reach.
format review
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2253100137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2253100137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22531001373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNit8KgjAcRkcUZH_e4QfdKmwOsbqTnNjNCgrKK1m2YlJbbUrU0-dFD9B3c-Ccr4c8EpMooDRe9JGHMcXBPCLHIRo5V-NulFAPFfucwZqnG85264TDISmWkOxYwn1grTUPKbT6iEYZ7YPQZ8iMleqqYWtuqnpDKk-ikQ6UBgFcvjpxN5UV1XuCBhdxc3L64xjNMrZf5cHDmmcrXVPWprW6S2UYRpRgTGhM_3t9AdYbP_E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>2253100137</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>THE INDONESIAN WAY: ASEAN, Europeanization, and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Martel, Stéphanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Martel, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><description>According to the author, the Indonesian "cognitive prior," which combines a realist inclination towards soft balancing, a mixture of entitlement and vulnerability, as well as antiliberal, organicist, and corporatist proclivities in state-society relations, can be traced back to the Majapahit Empire (1293-1500s). [...]it provides a longue durée analysis of localization, allowing for the possibility of reversal. By introducing three additional sets of actors (press, legislature, and business) and treating them as stakeholder groups in their own right, Rüland provides a more complete account of the foreign policy debate and offers a welcome glimpse into how their positions might not only extend beyond Indonesia to other ASEAN member states, but develop a truly regional reach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-3379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vancouver: Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia</publisher><subject>16th century ; Debates ; Democracy ; Europeanization ; Foreign policy ; Localization ; Nonfiction ; Norms ; Stakeholders ; State-society relations ; Supranationalism</subject><ispartof>Pacific affairs, 2019, Vol.92 (2), p.401-403</ispartof><rights>Copyright Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2253100137?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,780,784,792,12845,12847,21387,21394,33223,33611,33985,43733,43948</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martel, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><title>THE INDONESIAN WAY: ASEAN, Europeanization, and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy</title><title>Pacific affairs</title><description>According to the author, the Indonesian "cognitive prior," which combines a realist inclination towards soft balancing, a mixture of entitlement and vulnerability, as well as antiliberal, organicist, and corporatist proclivities in state-society relations, can be traced back to the Majapahit Empire (1293-1500s). [...]it provides a longue durée analysis of localization, allowing for the possibility of reversal. By introducing three additional sets of actors (press, legislature, and business) and treating them as stakeholder groups in their own right, Rüland provides a more complete account of the foreign policy debate and offers a welcome glimpse into how their positions might not only extend beyond Indonesia to other ASEAN member states, but develop a truly regional reach.</description><subject>16th century</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Europeanization</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Nonfiction</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><subject>Supranationalism</subject><issn>0030-851X</issn><issn>1715-3379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqNit8KgjAcRkcUZH_e4QfdKmwOsbqTnNjNCgrKK1m2YlJbbUrU0-dFD9B3c-Ccr4c8EpMooDRe9JGHMcXBPCLHIRo5V-NulFAPFfucwZqnG85264TDISmWkOxYwn1grTUPKbT6iEYZ7YPQZ8iMleqqYWtuqnpDKk-ikQ6UBgFcvjpxN5UV1XuCBhdxc3L64xjNMrZf5cHDmmcrXVPWprW6S2UYRpRgTGhM_3t9AdYbP_E</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Martel, Stéphanie</creator><general>Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>THE INDONESIAN WAY: ASEAN, Europeanization, and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy</title><author>Martel, Stéphanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22531001373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>16th century</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Europeanization</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Nonfiction</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><topic>Supranationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martel, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martel, Stéphanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>THE INDONESIAN WAY: ASEAN, Europeanization, and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy</atitle><jtitle>Pacific affairs</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>401-403</pages><issn>0030-851X</issn><eissn>1715-3379</eissn><abstract>According to the author, the Indonesian "cognitive prior," which combines a realist inclination towards soft balancing, a mixture of entitlement and vulnerability, as well as antiliberal, organicist, and corporatist proclivities in state-society relations, can be traced back to the Majapahit Empire (1293-1500s). [...]it provides a longue durée analysis of localization, allowing for the possibility of reversal. By introducing three additional sets of actors (press, legislature, and business) and treating them as stakeholder groups in their own right, Rüland provides a more complete account of the foreign policy debate and offers a welcome glimpse into how their positions might not only extend beyond Indonesia to other ASEAN member states, but develop a truly regional reach.</abstract><cop>Vancouver</cop><pub>Pacific Affairs. The University of British Columbia</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-851X
ispartof Pacific affairs, 2019, Vol.92 (2), p.401-403
issn 0030-851X
1715-3379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2253100137
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archival Journals; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects 16th century
Debates
Democracy
Europeanization
Foreign policy
Localization
Nonfiction
Norms
Stakeholders
State-society relations
Supranationalism
title THE INDONESIAN WAY: ASEAN, Europeanization, and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A50%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20INDONESIAN%20WAY:%20ASEAN,%20Europeanization,%20and%20Foreign%20Policy%20Debates%20in%20a%20New%20Democracy&rft.jtitle=Pacific%20affairs&rft.au=Martel,%20St%C3%A9phanie&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=401-403&rft.issn=0030-851X&rft.eissn=1715-3379&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2253100137%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22531001373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253100137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true