Loading…

Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Masks (BlastMask) Versus Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Firefighters: A Pilot Study

Despite maintaining high levels of fitness, firefighters' performance may be negatively impacted by the use of a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), an essential piece of safety equipment worn during structural firefighting. Routine training with SCBAs can be cost-prohibitive and ineffic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of exercise science 2019, Vol.12 (6), p.941-949
Main Authors: Andre, Thomas, Valladao, Silvio, Walsh, Shana, Reisbeck, Derek
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 949
container_issue 6
container_start_page 941
container_title International journal of exercise science
container_volume 12
creator Andre, Thomas
Valladao, Silvio
Walsh, Shana
Reisbeck, Derek
description Despite maintaining high levels of fitness, firefighters' performance may be negatively impacted by the use of a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), an essential piece of safety equipment worn during structural firefighting. Routine training with SCBAs can be cost-prohibitive and inefficient. The Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Mask (BlastMask) was developed as a training aid used to simulate the SCBA. The purpose of this study was to examine physiological and perceptual responses elicited by firefighters during steady state exercise when using the BlastMask compared to the SCBA. Current staff male firefighters (n = 10; mean age = 29.5 ± 7.7; mean BMI = 26.9 ± 2.7) performed two separate 10-minute steady state treadmill exercise sessions: one using an SCBA and one using a BlastMask. Pairedsamples t-tests were conducted to determine differences between mean heart rate (HR), mean pulse oximetry, postexercise perceived stress, rate of perceived exertion of the session (S-RPE-), and for each minute of breathing (BRPE) across the two trials. There were no significant differences between SCBA and BlastMask for HR (p = .07), pulse oximetry (p = .67), S-RPE (p = .08), or post-exercise perceived stress (p = .32); though firefighters reported greater B-RPE (p < .001) when using the BlastMask. Mean HR was strongly correlated between both sessions (r = .89). Based on these initial findings, the use of the BlastMask appears to elicit similar physiological and perceptual responses during steady state exercise when compared to the SCBA. The BlastMask may therefore be an appropriate supplemental, cost-effective training aid for firefighters, though more research is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.70252/TTPD1595
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2253245988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2253245988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1675-a91ef605d9a23bebbe44e3db8aa51b49e483675cd66324b5f2fe07c2ecee78bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFPg0AQhYnRxKZ68B9s4qU9oOwuC6w3ilZNamwCGm9kgaHdSgF3l0N_hP_ZrdXoXOYdvvcy8xznAntXoUcYuc6y5S1mnB05I8wpd0PO3o7_6VPnXOuNZ4dSHHI6cj5nCoRZy3aFFnIrDVQolgql0gzCyK4VDcqUkO0eeBL6XaPJrBHa7PUUvYLSg0YpNLWbdK2xoA34i4z7XihhLDJJk1k8RXWn0FwqqOVqbaz5BsVoKZvOoNQM1e7MOalFo-H8Z4-dl_ldljy4i-f7xyReuCUOQuYKjqEOPFZxQWgBRQG-D7QqIiEYLnwOfkQtV1ZBQIlfsJrU4IUlgRIgjIqKjp3LQ26vuo8BtMk33aDsszonhFkP41FkqemBKlWntT0675XcCrXLsZd_F57_Fk6_AEdqc-s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253245988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Masks (BlastMask) Versus Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Firefighters: A Pilot Study</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Andre, Thomas ; Valladao, Silvio ; Walsh, Shana ; Reisbeck, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>Andre, Thomas ; Valladao, Silvio ; Walsh, Shana ; Reisbeck, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>Despite maintaining high levels of fitness, firefighters' performance may be negatively impacted by the use of a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), an essential piece of safety equipment worn during structural firefighting. Routine training with SCBAs can be cost-prohibitive and inefficient. The Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Mask (BlastMask) was developed as a training aid used to simulate the SCBA. The purpose of this study was to examine physiological and perceptual responses elicited by firefighters during steady state exercise when using the BlastMask compared to the SCBA. Current staff male firefighters (n = 10; mean age = 29.5 ± 7.7; mean BMI = 26.9 ± 2.7) performed two separate 10-minute steady state treadmill exercise sessions: one using an SCBA and one using a BlastMask. Pairedsamples t-tests were conducted to determine differences between mean heart rate (HR), mean pulse oximetry, postexercise perceived stress, rate of perceived exertion of the session (S-RPE-), and for each minute of breathing (BRPE) across the two trials. There were no significant differences between SCBA and BlastMask for HR (p = .07), pulse oximetry (p = .67), S-RPE (p = .08), or post-exercise perceived stress (p = .32); though firefighters reported greater B-RPE (p &lt; .001) when using the BlastMask. Mean HR was strongly correlated between both sessions (r = .89). Based on these initial findings, the use of the BlastMask appears to elicit similar physiological and perceptual responses during steady state exercise when compared to the SCBA. The BlastMask may therefore be an appropriate supplemental, cost-effective training aid for firefighters, though more research is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.70252/TTPD1595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bowling Green: TopSCHOLAR</publisher><subject>Firefighters ; Physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of exercise science, 2019, Vol.12 (6), p.941-949</ispartof><rights>Copyright TopSCHOLAR 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0009-0009-2928-0361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andre, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valladao, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Shana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisbeck, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Masks (BlastMask) Versus Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Firefighters: A Pilot Study</title><title>International journal of exercise science</title><description>Despite maintaining high levels of fitness, firefighters' performance may be negatively impacted by the use of a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), an essential piece of safety equipment worn during structural firefighting. Routine training with SCBAs can be cost-prohibitive and inefficient. The Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Mask (BlastMask) was developed as a training aid used to simulate the SCBA. The purpose of this study was to examine physiological and perceptual responses elicited by firefighters during steady state exercise when using the BlastMask compared to the SCBA. Current staff male firefighters (n = 10; mean age = 29.5 ± 7.7; mean BMI = 26.9 ± 2.7) performed two separate 10-minute steady state treadmill exercise sessions: one using an SCBA and one using a BlastMask. Pairedsamples t-tests were conducted to determine differences between mean heart rate (HR), mean pulse oximetry, postexercise perceived stress, rate of perceived exertion of the session (S-RPE-), and for each minute of breathing (BRPE) across the two trials. There were no significant differences between SCBA and BlastMask for HR (p = .07), pulse oximetry (p = .67), S-RPE (p = .08), or post-exercise perceived stress (p = .32); though firefighters reported greater B-RPE (p &lt; .001) when using the BlastMask. Mean HR was strongly correlated between both sessions (r = .89). Based on these initial findings, the use of the BlastMask appears to elicit similar physiological and perceptual responses during steady state exercise when compared to the SCBA. The BlastMask may therefore be an appropriate supplemental, cost-effective training aid for firefighters, though more research is recommended.</description><subject>Firefighters</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><issn>1939-795X</issn><issn>1939-795X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEFPg0AQhYnRxKZ68B9s4qU9oOwuC6w3ilZNamwCGm9kgaHdSgF3l0N_hP_ZrdXoXOYdvvcy8xznAntXoUcYuc6y5S1mnB05I8wpd0PO3o7_6VPnXOuNZ4dSHHI6cj5nCoRZy3aFFnIrDVQolgql0gzCyK4VDcqUkO0eeBL6XaPJrBHa7PUUvYLSg0YpNLWbdK2xoA34i4z7XihhLDJJk1k8RXWn0FwqqOVqbaz5BsVoKZvOoNQM1e7MOalFo-H8Z4-dl_ldljy4i-f7xyReuCUOQuYKjqEOPFZxQWgBRQG-D7QqIiEYLnwOfkQtV1ZBQIlfsJrU4IUlgRIgjIqKjp3LQ26vuo8BtMk33aDsszonhFkP41FkqemBKlWntT0675XcCrXLsZd_F57_Fk6_AEdqc-s</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Andre, Thomas</creator><creator>Valladao, Silvio</creator><creator>Walsh, Shana</creator><creator>Reisbeck, Derek</creator><general>TopSCHOLAR</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2928-0361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Masks (BlastMask) Versus Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Firefighters: A Pilot Study</title><author>Andre, Thomas ; Valladao, Silvio ; Walsh, Shana ; Reisbeck, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1675-a91ef605d9a23bebbe44e3db8aa51b49e483675cd66324b5f2fe07c2ecee78bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Firefighters</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andre, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valladao, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Shana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisbeck, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andre, Thomas</au><au>Valladao, Silvio</au><au>Walsh, Shana</au><au>Reisbeck, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Masks (BlastMask) Versus Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Firefighters: A Pilot Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>941</spage><epage>949</epage><pages>941-949</pages><issn>1939-795X</issn><eissn>1939-795X</eissn><abstract>Despite maintaining high levels of fitness, firefighters' performance may be negatively impacted by the use of a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), an essential piece of safety equipment worn during structural firefighting. Routine training with SCBAs can be cost-prohibitive and inefficient. The Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Mask (BlastMask) was developed as a training aid used to simulate the SCBA. The purpose of this study was to examine physiological and perceptual responses elicited by firefighters during steady state exercise when using the BlastMask compared to the SCBA. Current staff male firefighters (n = 10; mean age = 29.5 ± 7.7; mean BMI = 26.9 ± 2.7) performed two separate 10-minute steady state treadmill exercise sessions: one using an SCBA and one using a BlastMask. Pairedsamples t-tests were conducted to determine differences between mean heart rate (HR), mean pulse oximetry, postexercise perceived stress, rate of perceived exertion of the session (S-RPE-), and for each minute of breathing (BRPE) across the two trials. There were no significant differences between SCBA and BlastMask for HR (p = .07), pulse oximetry (p = .67), S-RPE (p = .08), or post-exercise perceived stress (p = .32); though firefighters reported greater B-RPE (p &lt; .001) when using the BlastMask. Mean HR was strongly correlated between both sessions (r = .89). Based on these initial findings, the use of the BlastMask appears to elicit similar physiological and perceptual responses during steady state exercise when compared to the SCBA. The BlastMask may therefore be an appropriate supplemental, cost-effective training aid for firefighters, though more research is recommended.</abstract><cop>Bowling Green</cop><pub>TopSCHOLAR</pub><doi>10.70252/TTPD1595</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2928-0361</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-795X
ispartof International journal of exercise science, 2019, Vol.12 (6), p.941-949
issn 1939-795X
1939-795X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2253245988
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Firefighters
Physiology
title Breathing Limited Air Situational Training Masks (BlastMask) Versus Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Firefighters: A Pilot Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A46%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breathing%20Limited%20Air%20Situational%20Training%20Masks%20(BlastMask)%20Versus%20Self-Contained%20Breathing%20Apparatus%20(SCBA)%20for%20Firefighters:%20A%20Pilot%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20exercise%20science&rft.au=Andre,%20Thomas&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=941&rft.epage=949&rft.pages=941-949&rft.issn=1939-795X&rft.eissn=1939-795X&rft_id=info:doi/10.70252/TTPD1595&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253245988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1675-a91ef605d9a23bebbe44e3db8aa51b49e483675cd66324b5f2fe07c2ecee78bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253245988&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true