Experiences of being, and working with, young people with disabilities as peer researchers in Senegal: The impact on data quality, analysis, and well-being

The ‘insider’ status of peer researchers can increase access to study informants, enhance data quality and empower them, but comes with challenges related to their ability to collect and analyse quality data and ethical challenges. We piloted a peer research methodology in Senegal as part of a quali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice 2019-07, Vol.18 (4), p.583-600
Main Authors: Burke, Eva, le May, Alex, Kébé, Fatou, Flink, Ilse, van Reeuwijk, Miranda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Access
Data analysis
Data collection
Data quality
Disability
Health services
Peers
People with disabilities
Quality
Reflexivity
Reproductive health
Research methodology
Researchers
Sexual behavior
Well being
Womens health
Youth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The ‘insider’ status of peer researchers can increase access to study informants, enhance data quality and empower them, but comes with challenges related to their ability to collect and analyse quality data and ethical challenges. We piloted a peer research methodology in Senegal as part of a qualitative study on access to sexual and reproductive health services for young people with disabilities (YPWD) to assess how working with YPWD as peer researchers influences the quality of data and data analysis alongside understanding the experiences of being a peer researcher. Our study reveals that peer researchers facilitated building rapport with study informants, but they lacked experience in effectively probing. Some demonstrated potential to be involved in data analysis, but further research is needed to explore their contribution to the analysis and quality of data. We recommend considering peers throughout the whole research cycle, beyond data collection, and providing the necessary training and tools to allow them to effectively participate in the process, especially regarding exploration of sensitive research topics. Reflexivity tools can provide insights into the experiences of peer researchers, as well as monitor their well-being during the process, and contribute to data quality, but must be accompanied by clear guidance.
ISSN:1473-3250
1741-3117
DOI:10.1177/1473325018763515