Loading…
Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences
The phylogenetic position of Parasitaxus (Podocarpaceae) has been inferred from a cladistic analysis of molecular characters from chloroplast and nuclear genomes including all genera of Podocarpaceae. In all 24 most parsimonious trees, based on combined datasets, Phyllocladus resided outside Podocar...
Saved in:
Published in: | Plant systematics and evolution 2002-09, Vol.233 (1/2), p.79-104 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 104 |
container_issue | 1/2 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Plant systematics and evolution |
container_volume | 233 |
creator | Sinclair, W. T. Mill, R. R. Gardner, M. F. Woltz, P. Jaffré, T. Preston, J. Hollingsworth, M. L. Ponge, A. Möller, M. |
description | The phylogenetic position of Parasitaxus (Podocarpaceae) has been inferred from a cladistic analysis of molecular characters from chloroplast and nuclear genomes including all genera of Podocarpaceae. In all 24 most parsimonious trees, based on combined datasets, Phyllocladus resided outside Podocarpaceae s. str. while Lepidothamnus was basal to the latter. Most other genera were arranged in two major clades. The evidence confirms previous studies, which have suggested a relationship between Lagarostrobos, Manoao and Parasitaxus. Parasitaxus is not directly related to its host Falcatifolium taxoides. Instead it appears to be most closely related to Manoao and Lagarostrobos. No other members of this group now occur on New Caledonia. However, if the evolution of Parasitaxus were autochthonous, a free-living member of this group must once have occurred there. An accelerated evolutionary rate of the chloroplast sequence analysed was suggested, indicating that the plant behaves like a holoparasite. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00606-002-0199-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259349497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23644310</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23644310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-9882893bb4cba073fe30b2e1cdd6df5b51250f9f17ada3a63651fbc1b8d690233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtq3TAQhk1poKdJH6CLwkA3LcTNSLJlaxlOLg0ckkDT9WGsC_bBkVxJbtM36-NVIVnNMHzz_fBX1UeG3xhid5YQJcoakdfIlKr7N9WGSdbWkjF8W21QdH3NpereVe9TOiCyTjbdpvp3-TvMa56Cp_gXop3peU_jtCQIDvJo4db-gS3N1gQ_kYfRZhtDjmEZJw26HJ2Np3BPkdKU6WlNsKZM8OU-mKApLqQt2a-nMPkCRmvAxfAIepxDccyUMuTod_VVAYrVn6XnjwjkDfhVz5YixIvbc7h5-MEh2V-r9dqmk-rI0Zzsh9d5XP28unzYfq93d9c32_NdfeAocq36nvdKDEOjB8JOOCtw4JZpY6Rx7dAy3qJTjnVkSJAUsmVu0GzojVTIhTiuPr94lxhKdMr7Q1ijL5F7zlslGtWorlCfXqhDyiHulzg9lj73XMimEQzFf6b2gdE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259349497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Sinclair, W. T. ; Mill, R. R. ; Gardner, M. F. ; Woltz, P. ; Jaffré, T. ; Preston, J. ; Hollingsworth, M. L. ; Ponge, A. ; Möller, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, W. T. ; Mill, R. R. ; Gardner, M. F. ; Woltz, P. ; Jaffré, T. ; Preston, J. ; Hollingsworth, M. L. ; Ponge, A. ; Möller, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The phylogenetic position of Parasitaxus (Podocarpaceae) has been inferred from a cladistic analysis of molecular characters from chloroplast and nuclear genomes including all genera of Podocarpaceae. In all 24 most parsimonious trees, based on combined datasets, Phyllocladus resided outside Podocarpaceae s. str. while Lepidothamnus was basal to the latter. Most other genera were arranged in two major clades. The evidence confirms previous studies, which have suggested a relationship between Lagarostrobos, Manoao and Parasitaxus. Parasitaxus is not directly related to its host Falcatifolium taxoides. Instead it appears to be most closely related to Manoao and Lagarostrobos. No other members of this group now occur on New Caledonia. However, if the evolution of Parasitaxus were autochthonous, a free-living member of this group must once have occurred there. An accelerated evolutionary rate of the chloroplast sequence analysed was suggested, indicating that the plant behaves like a holoparasite.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-2697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-6881</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00606-002-0199-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological taxonomies ; Chloroplasts ; Cladistic analysis ; Conifers ; Evolution ; Genera ; Genomes ; Maximum parsimony ; Parasite hosts ; Parasitic plants ; Parasitism ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plants ; Podocarpaceae ; Spacer ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>Plant systematics and evolution, 2002-09, Vol.233 (1/2), p.79-104</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2002</rights><rights>Plant Systematics and Evolution is a copyright of Springer, (2002). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23644310$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23644310$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, W. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mill, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woltz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffré, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponge, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences</title><title>Plant systematics and evolution</title><description>The phylogenetic position of Parasitaxus (Podocarpaceae) has been inferred from a cladistic analysis of molecular characters from chloroplast and nuclear genomes including all genera of Podocarpaceae. In all 24 most parsimonious trees, based on combined datasets, Phyllocladus resided outside Podocarpaceae s. str. while Lepidothamnus was basal to the latter. Most other genera were arranged in two major clades. The evidence confirms previous studies, which have suggested a relationship between Lagarostrobos, Manoao and Parasitaxus. Parasitaxus is not directly related to its host Falcatifolium taxoides. Instead it appears to be most closely related to Manoao and Lagarostrobos. No other members of this group now occur on New Caledonia. However, if the evolution of Parasitaxus were autochthonous, a free-living member of this group must once have occurred there. An accelerated evolutionary rate of the chloroplast sequence analysed was suggested, indicating that the plant behaves like a holoparasite.</description><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Chloroplasts</subject><subject>Cladistic analysis</subject><subject>Conifers</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Maximum parsimony</subject><subject>Parasite hosts</subject><subject>Parasitic plants</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Podocarpaceae</subject><subject>Spacer</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>0378-2697</issn><issn>1615-6110</issn><issn>2199-6881</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtq3TAQhk1poKdJH6CLwkA3LcTNSLJlaxlOLg0ckkDT9WGsC_bBkVxJbtM36-NVIVnNMHzz_fBX1UeG3xhid5YQJcoakdfIlKr7N9WGSdbWkjF8W21QdH3NpereVe9TOiCyTjbdpvp3-TvMa56Cp_gXop3peU_jtCQIDvJo4db-gS3N1gQ_kYfRZhtDjmEZJw26HJ2Np3BPkdKU6WlNsKZM8OU-mKApLqQt2a-nMPkCRmvAxfAIepxDccyUMuTod_VVAYrVn6XnjwjkDfhVz5YixIvbc7h5-MEh2V-r9dqmk-rI0Zzsh9d5XP28unzYfq93d9c32_NdfeAocq36nvdKDEOjB8JOOCtw4JZpY6Rx7dAy3qJTjnVkSJAUsmVu0GzojVTIhTiuPr94lxhKdMr7Q1ijL5F7zlslGtWorlCfXqhDyiHulzg9lj73XMimEQzFf6b2gdE</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Sinclair, W. T.</creator><creator>Mill, R. R.</creator><creator>Gardner, M. F.</creator><creator>Woltz, P.</creator><creator>Jaffré, T.</creator><creator>Preston, J.</creator><creator>Hollingsworth, M. L.</creator><creator>Ponge, A.</creator><creator>Möller, M.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences</title><author>Sinclair, W. T. ; Mill, R. R. ; Gardner, M. F. ; Woltz, P. ; Jaffré, T. ; Preston, J. ; Hollingsworth, M. L. ; Ponge, A. ; Möller, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-9882893bb4cba073fe30b2e1cdd6df5b51250f9f17ada3a63651fbc1b8d690233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Chloroplasts</topic><topic>Cladistic analysis</topic><topic>Conifers</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Maximum parsimony</topic><topic>Parasite hosts</topic><topic>Parasitic plants</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Podocarpaceae</topic><topic>Spacer</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, W. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mill, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woltz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffré, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponge, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinclair, W. T.</au><au>Mill, R. R.</au><au>Gardner, M. F.</au><au>Woltz, P.</au><au>Jaffré, T.</au><au>Preston, J.</au><au>Hollingsworth, M. L.</au><au>Ponge, A.</au><au>Möller, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences</atitle><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>233</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>79-104</pages><issn>0378-2697</issn><eissn>1615-6110</eissn><eissn>2199-6881</eissn><abstract>The phylogenetic position of Parasitaxus (Podocarpaceae) has been inferred from a cladistic analysis of molecular characters from chloroplast and nuclear genomes including all genera of Podocarpaceae. In all 24 most parsimonious trees, based on combined datasets, Phyllocladus resided outside Podocarpaceae s. str. while Lepidothamnus was basal to the latter. Most other genera were arranged in two major clades. The evidence confirms previous studies, which have suggested a relationship between Lagarostrobos, Manoao and Parasitaxus. Parasitaxus is not directly related to its host Falcatifolium taxoides. Instead it appears to be most closely related to Manoao and Lagarostrobos. No other members of this group now occur on New Caledonia. However, if the evolution of Parasitaxus were autochthonous, a free-living member of this group must once have occurred there. An accelerated evolutionary rate of the chloroplast sequence analysed was suggested, indicating that the plant behaves like a holoparasite.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00606-002-0199-8</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-2697 |
ispartof | Plant systematics and evolution, 2002-09, Vol.233 (1/2), p.79-104 |
issn | 0378-2697 1615-6110 2199-6881 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2259349497 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Link |
subjects | Biological taxonomies Chloroplasts Cladistic analysis Conifers Evolution Genera Genomes Maximum parsimony Parasite hosts Parasitic plants Parasitism Phylogenetics Phylogeny Plants Podocarpaceae Spacer Taxa |
title | Evolutionary relationships of the New Caledonian heterotrophic conifer, Parasitaxus usta (Podocarpaceae), inferred from chloroplast trnL-F intron/spacer and nuclear rDNA ITS2 sequences |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A16%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolutionary%20relationships%20of%20the%20New%20Caledonian%20heterotrophic%20conifer,%20Parasitaxus%20usta%20(Podocarpaceae),%20inferred%20from%20chloroplast%20trnL-F%20intron/spacer%20and%20nuclear%20rDNA%20ITS2%20sequences&rft.jtitle=Plant%20systematics%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Sinclair,%20W.%20T.&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=233&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=79-104&rft.issn=0378-2697&rft.eissn=1615-6110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00606-002-0199-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23644310%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j203t-9882893bb4cba073fe30b2e1cdd6df5b51250f9f17ada3a63651fbc1b8d690233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259349497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23644310&rfr_iscdi=true |