Loading…

Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modeling provide insights into the geographic divergence of Eriosyce subgen. Neoporteria (Cactaceae)

The classification of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (“subsection” in the sense of Kattermann) and the role of allopatry/sympatry in the diversification of the group were studied by use of cladistic and predictive distribution modeling methods. We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of subge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant systematics and evolution 2011-11, Vol.297 (1-2), p.113-128
Main Authors: Guerrero, Pablo C, Arroyo, Mary T. K, Bustamante, Ramiro O, Duarte, Milén, Hagemann, Thomas K, Walter, Helmut E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-992b9a673153663de5264b79a1633f617ac48d605b4fa4300cd8d0a9f5ced86d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-992b9a673153663de5264b79a1633f617ac48d605b4fa4300cd8d0a9f5ced86d3
container_end_page 128
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 113
container_title Plant systematics and evolution
container_volume 297
creator Guerrero, Pablo C
Arroyo, Mary T. K
Bustamante, Ramiro O
Duarte, Milén
Hagemann, Thomas K
Walter, Helmut E
description The classification of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (“subsection” in the sense of Kattermann) and the role of allopatry/sympatry in the diversification of the group were studied by use of cladistic and predictive distribution modeling methods. We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of subgenus Neoporteria by analyzing 38 morphological characters and DNA sequences from two chloroplast regions of 21 taxa from the Chilean subsections of Eriosyce using a Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic framework. Also, we attempted to find out if the divergence between the sister taxa in the Neoporteria group had been caused by allopatric or sympatric mechanisms. The morphology-based analysis placed E. chilensis basal within the Neoporteria clade and suggested a further broadening of the group by including E. taltalensis var. taltalensis, formerly considered a member of subsection Horridocactus. However, the combined DNA data placed E. sociabilis and E. taltalensis var. taltalensis within the Horridocactus clade, and placed E. chilensis with E. subgibbosa var. litoralis. The broad concept of E. subgibbosa sensu Kattermann (comprising seven infraspecific taxa), was rejected by our combined molecular results. Finally, our results corroborated changes in subsection Neoporteria proposed by various authors and suggested further modifications within Neoporteria. The analyses of the degree of geographic overlap of the predicted distributions indicated null overlap between the sister taxa, and one probable hybrid origin of E. chilensis, indicating that evolutionary divergence is mainly caused by an allopatric process associated with climatic tolerance.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00606-011-0512-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2259364362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43558272</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43558272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-992b9a673153663de5264b79a1633f617ac48d605b4fa4300cd8d0a9f5ced86d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1uEzEUhUcIpIbCA3SBsMSmLKZc_88sUVR-pKogQdeWx74zcZSOg-1EykvwzDgaBLuufGWf75zr0zRXFG4ogP6QARSoFihtQVLWymfNiioqW0UpPG9WwHXXMtXri-ZlzlsAqpXQq-b3981pFyecsQSXiZ092Sf0wZVwROJDLikMhxLiTB6jx12YpyqIx-CRhDmHaVNyHUokZYNkwjglu98EV9EjpurrkMSR3KYQ86nO-TDUyxtyj3EfU8EULLleW1esQ4vvXzUvRrvL-Prvedk8fLr9uf7S3n37_HX98a51XLHS9j0beqs0p5IrxT1KpsSge0sV56Oi2jrReQVyEKMVHMD5zoPtR-nQd8rzy-bd4lv_8uuAuZhtPKS5RhrGZM-VqDlVRReVSzHnhKPZp_Bo08lQMOfazVK7qbWbc-1GVoYtTK7aecL03_kp6M0CbXOJ6V-K4FJ2TJ8Xebu8jzYaO6WQzcMPBlQAQMeEpvwPqMmaTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259364362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modeling provide insights into the geographic divergence of Eriosyce subgen. Neoporteria (Cactaceae)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Guerrero, Pablo C ; Arroyo, Mary T. K ; Bustamante, Ramiro O ; Duarte, Milén ; Hagemann, Thomas K ; Walter, Helmut E</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Pablo C ; Arroyo, Mary T. K ; Bustamante, Ramiro O ; Duarte, Milén ; Hagemann, Thomas K ; Walter, Helmut E</creatorcontrib><description>The classification of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (“subsection” in the sense of Kattermann) and the role of allopatry/sympatry in the diversification of the group were studied by use of cladistic and predictive distribution modeling methods. We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of subgenus Neoporteria by analyzing 38 morphological characters and DNA sequences from two chloroplast regions of 21 taxa from the Chilean subsections of Eriosyce using a Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic framework. Also, we attempted to find out if the divergence between the sister taxa in the Neoporteria group had been caused by allopatric or sympatric mechanisms. The morphology-based analysis placed E. chilensis basal within the Neoporteria clade and suggested a further broadening of the group by including E. taltalensis var. taltalensis, formerly considered a member of subsection Horridocactus. However, the combined DNA data placed E. sociabilis and E. taltalensis var. taltalensis within the Horridocactus clade, and placed E. chilensis with E. subgibbosa var. litoralis. The broad concept of E. subgibbosa sensu Kattermann (comprising seven infraspecific taxa), was rejected by our combined molecular results. Finally, our results corroborated changes in subsection Neoporteria proposed by various authors and suggested further modifications within Neoporteria. The analyses of the degree of geographic overlap of the predicted distributions indicated null overlap between the sister taxa, and one probable hybrid origin of E. chilensis, indicating that evolutionary divergence is mainly caused by an allopatric process associated with climatic tolerance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-2697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-6881</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00606-011-0512-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Allopatry ; Bayesian analysis ; Biological taxonomies ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cactaceae ; Chloroplast DNA ; Chloroplasts ; Datasets ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Divergence ; divergent evolution ; DNA ; Ecological modeling ; Gene sequencing ; Geography ; Life Sciences ; Modeling ; Modelling ; Morphology ; Nucleotide sequence ; nucleotide sequences ; Original Article ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Predictive modeling ; Speciation ; Sympatric populations ; Sympatry ; Taxa</subject><ispartof>Plant systematics and evolution, 2011-11, Vol.297 (1-2), p.113-128</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>Plant Systematics and Evolution is a copyright of Springer, (2011). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-992b9a673153663de5264b79a1633f617ac48d605b4fa4300cd8d0a9f5ced86d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-992b9a673153663de5264b79a1633f617ac48d605b4fa4300cd8d0a9f5ced86d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43558272$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43558272$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907,58220,58453</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Pablo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Mary T. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Ramiro O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Milén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, Thomas K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Helmut E</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modeling provide insights into the geographic divergence of Eriosyce subgen. Neoporteria (Cactaceae)</title><title>Plant systematics and evolution</title><addtitle>Plant Syst Evol</addtitle><description>The classification of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (“subsection” in the sense of Kattermann) and the role of allopatry/sympatry in the diversification of the group were studied by use of cladistic and predictive distribution modeling methods. We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of subgenus Neoporteria by analyzing 38 morphological characters and DNA sequences from two chloroplast regions of 21 taxa from the Chilean subsections of Eriosyce using a Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic framework. Also, we attempted to find out if the divergence between the sister taxa in the Neoporteria group had been caused by allopatric or sympatric mechanisms. The morphology-based analysis placed E. chilensis basal within the Neoporteria clade and suggested a further broadening of the group by including E. taltalensis var. taltalensis, formerly considered a member of subsection Horridocactus. However, the combined DNA data placed E. sociabilis and E. taltalensis var. taltalensis within the Horridocactus clade, and placed E. chilensis with E. subgibbosa var. litoralis. The broad concept of E. subgibbosa sensu Kattermann (comprising seven infraspecific taxa), was rejected by our combined molecular results. Finally, our results corroborated changes in subsection Neoporteria proposed by various authors and suggested further modifications within Neoporteria. The analyses of the degree of geographic overlap of the predicted distributions indicated null overlap between the sister taxa, and one probable hybrid origin of E. chilensis, indicating that evolutionary divergence is mainly caused by an allopatric process associated with climatic tolerance.</description><subject>Allopatry</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cactaceae</subject><subject>Chloroplast DNA</subject><subject>Chloroplasts</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>divergent evolution</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>nucleotide sequences</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Predictive modeling</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><subject>Sympatry</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><issn>0378-2697</issn><issn>1615-6110</issn><issn>2199-6881</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1uEzEUhUcIpIbCA3SBsMSmLKZc_88sUVR-pKogQdeWx74zcZSOg-1EykvwzDgaBLuufGWf75zr0zRXFG4ogP6QARSoFihtQVLWymfNiioqW0UpPG9WwHXXMtXri-ZlzlsAqpXQq-b3981pFyecsQSXiZ092Sf0wZVwROJDLikMhxLiTB6jx12YpyqIx-CRhDmHaVNyHUokZYNkwjglu98EV9EjpurrkMSR3KYQ86nO-TDUyxtyj3EfU8EULLleW1esQ4vvXzUvRrvL-Prvedk8fLr9uf7S3n37_HX98a51XLHS9j0beqs0p5IrxT1KpsSge0sV56Oi2jrReQVyEKMVHMD5zoPtR-nQd8rzy-bd4lv_8uuAuZhtPKS5RhrGZM-VqDlVRReVSzHnhKPZp_Bo08lQMOfazVK7qbWbc-1GVoYtTK7aecL03_kp6M0CbXOJ6V-K4FJ2TJ8Xebu8jzYaO6WQzcMPBlQAQMeEpvwPqMmaTQ</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Guerrero, Pablo C</creator><creator>Arroyo, Mary T. K</creator><creator>Bustamante, Ramiro O</creator><creator>Duarte, Milén</creator><creator>Hagemann, Thomas K</creator><creator>Walter, Helmut E</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modeling provide insights into the geographic divergence of Eriosyce subgen. Neoporteria (Cactaceae)</title><author>Guerrero, Pablo C ; Arroyo, Mary T. K ; Bustamante, Ramiro O ; Duarte, Milén ; Hagemann, Thomas K ; Walter, Helmut E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-992b9a673153663de5264b79a1633f617ac48d605b4fa4300cd8d0a9f5ced86d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Allopatry</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cactaceae</topic><topic>Chloroplast DNA</topic><topic>Chloroplasts</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>divergent evolution</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>nucleotide sequences</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Predictive modeling</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><topic>Sympatry</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Pablo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Mary T. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Ramiro O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Milén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagemann, Thomas K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Helmut E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerrero, Pablo C</au><au>Arroyo, Mary T. K</au><au>Bustamante, Ramiro O</au><au>Duarte, Milén</au><au>Hagemann, Thomas K</au><au>Walter, Helmut E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modeling provide insights into the geographic divergence of Eriosyce subgen. Neoporteria (Cactaceae)</atitle><jtitle>Plant systematics and evolution</jtitle><stitle>Plant Syst Evol</stitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>297</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>113-128</pages><issn>0378-2697</issn><eissn>1615-6110</eissn><eissn>2199-6881</eissn><abstract>The classification of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (“subsection” in the sense of Kattermann) and the role of allopatry/sympatry in the diversification of the group were studied by use of cladistic and predictive distribution modeling methods. We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of subgenus Neoporteria by analyzing 38 morphological characters and DNA sequences from two chloroplast regions of 21 taxa from the Chilean subsections of Eriosyce using a Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic framework. Also, we attempted to find out if the divergence between the sister taxa in the Neoporteria group had been caused by allopatric or sympatric mechanisms. The morphology-based analysis placed E. chilensis basal within the Neoporteria clade and suggested a further broadening of the group by including E. taltalensis var. taltalensis, formerly considered a member of subsection Horridocactus. However, the combined DNA data placed E. sociabilis and E. taltalensis var. taltalensis within the Horridocactus clade, and placed E. chilensis with E. subgibbosa var. litoralis. The broad concept of E. subgibbosa sensu Kattermann (comprising seven infraspecific taxa), was rejected by our combined molecular results. Finally, our results corroborated changes in subsection Neoporteria proposed by various authors and suggested further modifications within Neoporteria. The analyses of the degree of geographic overlap of the predicted distributions indicated null overlap between the sister taxa, and one probable hybrid origin of E. chilensis, indicating that evolutionary divergence is mainly caused by an allopatric process associated with climatic tolerance.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00606-011-0512-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-2697
ispartof Plant systematics and evolution, 2011-11, Vol.297 (1-2), p.113-128
issn 0378-2697
1615-6110
2199-6881
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2259364362
source Springer Nature; JSTOR
subjects Allopatry
Bayesian analysis
Biological taxonomies
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cactaceae
Chloroplast DNA
Chloroplasts
Datasets
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Divergence
divergent evolution
DNA
Ecological modeling
Gene sequencing
Geography
Life Sciences
Modeling
Modelling
Morphology
Nucleotide sequence
nucleotide sequences
Original Article
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Plant Anatomy/Development
Plant Ecology
Plant Sciences
Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Predictive modeling
Speciation
Sympatric populations
Sympatry
Taxa
title Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modeling provide insights into the geographic divergence of Eriosyce subgen. Neoporteria (Cactaceae)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A49%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetics%20and%20predictive%20distribution%20modeling%20provide%20insights%20into%20the%20geographic%20divergence%20of%20Eriosyce%20subgen.%20Neoporteria%20(Cactaceae)&rft.jtitle=Plant%20systematics%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Guerrero,%20Pablo%20C&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=297&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=113-128&rft.issn=0378-2697&rft.eissn=1615-6110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00606-011-0512-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43558272%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-992b9a673153663de5264b79a1633f617ac48d605b4fa4300cd8d0a9f5ced86d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259364362&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43558272&rfr_iscdi=true