Loading…
Neither apposition nor superposition: the compound eyes of the Chestnut Leafminer Cameraria ohridella
The two lemon-shaped compound eyes of the moth Cameraria ohridella measure in dorsal–ventral direction 263.0 μm in male and 238.9 μm in female individuals. In anterior–posterior direction no significant differences were found between the sexes, eye length being about 194.6 μm. The eyes of males cons...
Saved in:
Published in: | Zoomorphology 2012-03, Vol.131 (1), p.37-55 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3de101841212c7d57a384125268b1eaf04b8ce2db0bcfb4fefb3b7a478fde4573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3de101841212c7d57a384125268b1eaf04b8ce2db0bcfb4fefb3b7a478fde4573 |
container_end_page | 55 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Zoomorphology |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Fischer, Stefan Müller, Carsten H. G. Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno |
description | The two lemon-shaped compound eyes of the moth
Cameraria ohridella
measure in dorsal–ventral direction 263.0 μm in male and 238.9 μm in female individuals. In anterior–posterior direction no significant differences were found between the sexes, eye length being about 194.6 μm. The eyes of males consist of ca. 417 hexagonal facets, while those of females contain 367. In both sexes facet diameters are approximately 11.5 μm. Despite the size differences of the eyes in the two sexes, ultrastructurally they are identical and both possess ommatidia of 80 μm mean length. The ultrastructure of the eye is described and compared with that of other compound eyes of Lepidoptera. Anatomically the eyes represent a type intermediate between apposition and refractive superposition kind. A distal rhabdom is present in the space that in the eyes of larger moths with superposition optics is occupied by the so-called clear zone. A tracheal tapetum and longitudinal screening pigment migrations, typical of superposition but not apposition eyes are present despite the lack of a clear zone. Thus, our results support an earlier calculated minimal theoretical limit for superposition eyes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00435-011-0141-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2261528268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261528268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3de101841212c7d57a384125268b1eaf04b8ce2db0bcfb4fefb3b7a478fde4573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPxCAYRYnRxHH0B7gjcV3l1aFxZxpfSaMbTWZHoP1wmEyhQruYfy9jNa5cAOHLuQdyEbqk5JoSIm8SIYKXBaE0L5G3I7SggrOCcbE-RgsiGSkY5etTdJbSlmRoJfgCwQu4cQMR62EIyY0ueOxDxGkaIP5ObnFGcBv6IUy-w7CHhIP9HtYbSKOfRtyAtr3z2VTrHqKOTuOwia6D3U6foxOrdwkufs4len-4f6ufiub18bm-a4qWV2wseAeU0EpQRlkru1JqfriUbFUZmv1EmKoF1hliWmuEBWu4kVrIynYgSsmX6Gr2DjF8Tvlnahum6POTirEVLVmVVZmiM9XGkFIEq4boeh33ihJ1aFPNbarcpjq0qUjOsDmTMus_IP6Z_w99AU4keSM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261528268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neither apposition nor superposition: the compound eyes of the Chestnut Leafminer Cameraria ohridella</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Fischer, Stefan ; Müller, Carsten H. G. ; Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan ; Müller, Carsten H. G. ; Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno</creatorcontrib><description>The two lemon-shaped compound eyes of the moth
Cameraria ohridella
measure in dorsal–ventral direction 263.0 μm in male and 238.9 μm in female individuals. In anterior–posterior direction no significant differences were found between the sexes, eye length being about 194.6 μm. The eyes of males consist of ca. 417 hexagonal facets, while those of females contain 367. In both sexes facet diameters are approximately 11.5 μm. Despite the size differences of the eyes in the two sexes, ultrastructurally they are identical and both possess ommatidia of 80 μm mean length. The ultrastructure of the eye is described and compared with that of other compound eyes of Lepidoptera. Anatomically the eyes represent a type intermediate between apposition and refractive superposition kind. A distal rhabdom is present in the space that in the eyes of larger moths with superposition optics is occupied by the so-called clear zone. A tracheal tapetum and longitudinal screening pigment migrations, typical of superposition but not apposition eyes are present despite the lack of a clear zone. Thus, our results support an earlier calculated minimal theoretical limit for superposition eyes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-213X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-234X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00435-011-0141-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Apposition ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies & moths ; Cameraria ohridella ; Compound eyes ; Crustaceans ; Developmental Biology ; Direction ; Evolutionary Biology ; Eye ; Eyes ; Females ; Histology ; Life Sciences ; Morphology ; Ommatidia ; Optics ; Original Paper ; Rhabdom ; Ultrastructure</subject><ispartof>Zoomorphology, 2012-03, Vol.131 (1), p.37-55</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>Zoomorphology is a copyright of Springer, (2011). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3de101841212c7d57a384125268b1eaf04b8ce2db0bcfb4fefb3b7a478fde4573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3de101841212c7d57a384125268b1eaf04b8ce2db0bcfb4fefb3b7a478fde4573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno</creatorcontrib><title>Neither apposition nor superposition: the compound eyes of the Chestnut Leafminer Cameraria ohridella</title><title>Zoomorphology</title><addtitle>Zoomorphology</addtitle><description>The two lemon-shaped compound eyes of the moth
Cameraria ohridella
measure in dorsal–ventral direction 263.0 μm in male and 238.9 μm in female individuals. In anterior–posterior direction no significant differences were found between the sexes, eye length being about 194.6 μm. The eyes of males consist of ca. 417 hexagonal facets, while those of females contain 367. In both sexes facet diameters are approximately 11.5 μm. Despite the size differences of the eyes in the two sexes, ultrastructurally they are identical and both possess ommatidia of 80 μm mean length. The ultrastructure of the eye is described and compared with that of other compound eyes of Lepidoptera. Anatomically the eyes represent a type intermediate between apposition and refractive superposition kind. A distal rhabdom is present in the space that in the eyes of larger moths with superposition optics is occupied by the so-called clear zone. A tracheal tapetum and longitudinal screening pigment migrations, typical of superposition but not apposition eyes are present despite the lack of a clear zone. Thus, our results support an earlier calculated minimal theoretical limit for superposition eyes.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Apposition</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Cameraria ohridella</subject><subject>Compound eyes</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Direction</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eyes</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Ommatidia</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rhabdom</subject><subject>Ultrastructure</subject><issn>0720-213X</issn><issn>1432-234X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPxCAYRYnRxHH0B7gjcV3l1aFxZxpfSaMbTWZHoP1wmEyhQruYfy9jNa5cAOHLuQdyEbqk5JoSIm8SIYKXBaE0L5G3I7SggrOCcbE-RgsiGSkY5etTdJbSlmRoJfgCwQu4cQMR62EIyY0ueOxDxGkaIP5ObnFGcBv6IUy-w7CHhIP9HtYbSKOfRtyAtr3z2VTrHqKOTuOwia6D3U6foxOrdwkufs4len-4f6ufiub18bm-a4qWV2wseAeU0EpQRlkru1JqfriUbFUZmv1EmKoF1hliWmuEBWu4kVrIynYgSsmX6Gr2DjF8Tvlnahum6POTirEVLVmVVZmiM9XGkFIEq4boeh33ihJ1aFPNbarcpjq0qUjOsDmTMus_IP6Z_w99AU4keSM</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Fischer, Stefan</creator><creator>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creator><creator>Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Neither apposition nor superposition: the compound eyes of the Chestnut Leafminer Cameraria ohridella</title><author>Fischer, Stefan ; Müller, Carsten H. G. ; Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3de101841212c7d57a384125268b1eaf04b8ce2db0bcfb4fefb3b7a478fde4573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Apposition</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Cameraria ohridella</topic><topic>Compound eyes</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Direction</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eyes</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Ommatidia</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rhabdom</topic><topic>Ultrastructure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Carsten H. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, Stefan</au><au>Müller, Carsten H. G.</au><au>Meyer-Rochow, V. Benno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neither apposition nor superposition: the compound eyes of the Chestnut Leafminer Cameraria ohridella</atitle><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle><stitle>Zoomorphology</stitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>37-55</pages><issn>0720-213X</issn><eissn>1432-234X</eissn><abstract>The two lemon-shaped compound eyes of the moth
Cameraria ohridella
measure in dorsal–ventral direction 263.0 μm in male and 238.9 μm in female individuals. In anterior–posterior direction no significant differences were found between the sexes, eye length being about 194.6 μm. The eyes of males consist of ca. 417 hexagonal facets, while those of females contain 367. In both sexes facet diameters are approximately 11.5 μm. Despite the size differences of the eyes in the two sexes, ultrastructurally they are identical and both possess ommatidia of 80 μm mean length. The ultrastructure of the eye is described and compared with that of other compound eyes of Lepidoptera. Anatomically the eyes represent a type intermediate between apposition and refractive superposition kind. A distal rhabdom is present in the space that in the eyes of larger moths with superposition optics is occupied by the so-called clear zone. A tracheal tapetum and longitudinal screening pigment migrations, typical of superposition but not apposition eyes are present despite the lack of a clear zone. Thus, our results support an earlier calculated minimal theoretical limit for superposition eyes.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00435-011-0141-0</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-213X |
ispartof | Zoomorphology, 2012-03, Vol.131 (1), p.37-55 |
issn | 0720-213X 1432-234X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2261528268 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Animal Anatomy Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Apposition Biomedical and Life Sciences Butterflies & moths Cameraria ohridella Compound eyes Crustaceans Developmental Biology Direction Evolutionary Biology Eye Eyes Females Histology Life Sciences Morphology Ommatidia Optics Original Paper Rhabdom Ultrastructure |
title | Neither apposition nor superposition: the compound eyes of the Chestnut Leafminer Cameraria ohridella |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A55%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neither%20apposition%20nor%20superposition:%20the%20compound%20eyes%20of%20the%20Chestnut%20Leafminer%20Cameraria%20ohridella&rft.jtitle=Zoomorphology&rft.au=Fischer,%20Stefan&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=37-55&rft.issn=0720-213X&rft.eissn=1432-234X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00435-011-0141-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261528268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3de101841212c7d57a384125268b1eaf04b8ce2db0bcfb4fefb3b7a478fde4573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261528268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |