Loading…
Resurfacing knee arthroplasty in patients with allergic sensitivity to metals
The problem of metal sensitivity (Ni, Cr, and Co) in arthroplasty is still unsolved. To prevent the risk of allergy in cases with proved metal allergy in an epicutaneous test, a Natural Knee total knee arthroplasty, made totally from titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) and polyethylene, can be implanted. The resul...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2003-05, Vol.123 (4), p.139-143 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1ce5a235c50d996167c99aafe63ce86ece4000c429fc016bfa18a1ef75faf833 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 143 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | PELLENGAHR, C MAYER, W MAIER, M MÜLLER, P. E SCHULZ, C DÜRR, H. R TROUILLIER, H STEINBORN, M JANSSON, V REFIOR, H. J |
description | The problem of metal sensitivity (Ni, Cr, and Co) in arthroplasty is still unsolved. To prevent the risk of allergy in cases with proved metal allergy in an epicutaneous test, a Natural Knee total knee arthroplasty, made totally from titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) and polyethylene, can be implanted. The results of this device have to be compared to the results of normal knee arthroplasty designed with a femoral component out of CrCoNi alloy. The mechanical resistance of this alloy is much higher than that of titanium, and therefore it is the standard for the femoral components of most knee-resurfacing devices.
Thirty-five patients with a titanium Natural Knee were examined retrospectively after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 5 months (range 6 months to 5 years and 4 months). In comparison, 36 patients with a Genesis-I knee with a CrCoNi alloy femoral component were studied after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 4 months (range 8 months to 6 years and 2 months).
In spite of the lower mechanical resistance of titanium, the Natural Knee showed better results (knee score 84.1 points, function score 77.7 points, HSS score 80.1 points, 82.9% excellent and good results) than the Genesis-I knee (knee score 80.6 points, function score 76.4 points, HSS score 76.4 points, 68.5% excellent and good results), although these differences had no statistical significance.
The titanium Natural Knee prosthesis has proven to be a reliable knee joint replacement in the medium term. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-002-0429-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2261987449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261987449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1ce5a235c50d996167c99aafe63ce86ece4000c429fc016bfa18a1ef75faf833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMotlY_gBcJiMfVl2Q3mxyl-A8qguh5SdOXNnW7W5Os0m_vli54eMzlNzO8IeSSwS0DKO8iQA48g_3lXGdwRMYsF3kmNJPHZAxayExBwUbkLMY1AONKwykZMS5VKZQak9d3jF1wxvpmSb8aRGpCWoV2W5uYdtQ3dGuSxyZF-uvTipq6xrD0lkZsok_-x_dUaukGk6njOTlxveDFoBPy-fjwMX3OZm9PL9P7WWZFUaRswSwWhovCFrDQWjJZWq2NcSiFRSXRYg4Atv_JWWBy7gxThqErC2ecEmJCrg-529B-dxhTtW670PSVFeeSaVXmue4pdqBsaGMM6Kpt8BsTdhWDaj9gdRiwgv31ZRX0nqshuZtvcPHvGBbrgZsBMNGa2gXTWB__uVzxUgkQf7efeXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261987449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resurfacing knee arthroplasty in patients with allergic sensitivity to metals</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>PELLENGAHR, C ; MAYER, W ; MAIER, M ; MÜLLER, P. E ; SCHULZ, C ; DÜRR, H. R ; TROUILLIER, H ; STEINBORN, M ; JANSSON, V ; REFIOR, H. J</creator><creatorcontrib>PELLENGAHR, C ; MAYER, W ; MAIER, M ; MÜLLER, P. E ; SCHULZ, C ; DÜRR, H. R ; TROUILLIER, H ; STEINBORN, M ; JANSSON, V ; REFIOR, H. J</creatorcontrib><description>The problem of metal sensitivity (Ni, Cr, and Co) in arthroplasty is still unsolved. To prevent the risk of allergy in cases with proved metal allergy in an epicutaneous test, a Natural Knee total knee arthroplasty, made totally from titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) and polyethylene, can be implanted. The results of this device have to be compared to the results of normal knee arthroplasty designed with a femoral component out of CrCoNi alloy. The mechanical resistance of this alloy is much higher than that of titanium, and therefore it is the standard for the femoral components of most knee-resurfacing devices.
Thirty-five patients with a titanium Natural Knee were examined retrospectively after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 5 months (range 6 months to 5 years and 4 months). In comparison, 36 patients with a Genesis-I knee with a CrCoNi alloy femoral component were studied after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 4 months (range 8 months to 6 years and 2 months).
In spite of the lower mechanical resistance of titanium, the Natural Knee showed better results (knee score 84.1 points, function score 77.7 points, HSS score 80.1 points, 82.9% excellent and good results) than the Genesis-I knee (knee score 80.6 points, function score 76.4 points, HSS score 76.4 points, 68.5% excellent and good results), although these differences had no statistical significance.
The titanium Natural Knee prosthesis has proven to be a reliable knee joint replacement in the medium term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-002-0429-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12687388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - etiology ; Hypersensitivity - surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metals - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Recovery of Function ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors ; Titanium ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2003-05, Vol.123 (4), p.139-143</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2003). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1ce5a235c50d996167c99aafe63ce86ece4000c429fc016bfa18a1ef75faf833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14827830$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12687388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PELLENGAHR, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYER, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAIER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MÜLLER, P. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DÜRR, H. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TROUILLIER, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEINBORN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSSON, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REFIOR, H. J</creatorcontrib><title>Resurfacing knee arthroplasty in patients with allergic sensitivity to metals</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>The problem of metal sensitivity (Ni, Cr, and Co) in arthroplasty is still unsolved. To prevent the risk of allergy in cases with proved metal allergy in an epicutaneous test, a Natural Knee total knee arthroplasty, made totally from titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) and polyethylene, can be implanted. The results of this device have to be compared to the results of normal knee arthroplasty designed with a femoral component out of CrCoNi alloy. The mechanical resistance of this alloy is much higher than that of titanium, and therefore it is the standard for the femoral components of most knee-resurfacing devices.
Thirty-five patients with a titanium Natural Knee were examined retrospectively after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 5 months (range 6 months to 5 years and 4 months). In comparison, 36 patients with a Genesis-I knee with a CrCoNi alloy femoral component were studied after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 4 months (range 8 months to 6 years and 2 months).
In spite of the lower mechanical resistance of titanium, the Natural Knee showed better results (knee score 84.1 points, function score 77.7 points, HSS score 80.1 points, 82.9% excellent and good results) than the Genesis-I knee (knee score 80.6 points, function score 76.4 points, HSS score 76.4 points, 68.5% excellent and good results), although these differences had no statistical significance.
The titanium Natural Knee prosthesis has proven to be a reliable knee joint replacement in the medium term.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - etiology</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metals - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMotlY_gBcJiMfVl2Q3mxyl-A8qguh5SdOXNnW7W5Os0m_vli54eMzlNzO8IeSSwS0DKO8iQA48g_3lXGdwRMYsF3kmNJPHZAxayExBwUbkLMY1AONKwykZMS5VKZQak9d3jF1wxvpmSb8aRGpCWoV2W5uYdtQ3dGuSxyZF-uvTipq6xrD0lkZsok_-x_dUaukGk6njOTlxveDFoBPy-fjwMX3OZm9PL9P7WWZFUaRswSwWhovCFrDQWjJZWq2NcSiFRSXRYg4Atv_JWWBy7gxThqErC2ecEmJCrg-529B-dxhTtW670PSVFeeSaVXmue4pdqBsaGMM6Kpt8BsTdhWDaj9gdRiwgv31ZRX0nqshuZtvcPHvGBbrgZsBMNGa2gXTWB__uVzxUgkQf7efeXE</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>PELLENGAHR, C</creator><creator>MAYER, W</creator><creator>MAIER, M</creator><creator>MÜLLER, P. E</creator><creator>SCHULZ, C</creator><creator>DÜRR, H. R</creator><creator>TROUILLIER, H</creator><creator>STEINBORN, M</creator><creator>JANSSON, V</creator><creator>REFIOR, H. J</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Resurfacing knee arthroplasty in patients with allergic sensitivity to metals</title><author>PELLENGAHR, C ; MAYER, W ; MAIER, M ; MÜLLER, P. E ; SCHULZ, C ; DÜRR, H. R ; TROUILLIER, H ; STEINBORN, M ; JANSSON, V ; REFIOR, H. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1ce5a235c50d996167c99aafe63ce86ece4000c429fc016bfa18a1ef75faf833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - etiology</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metals - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PELLENGAHR, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYER, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAIER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MÜLLER, P. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DÜRR, H. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TROUILLIER, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEINBORN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSSON, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REFIOR, H. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PELLENGAHR, C</au><au>MAYER, W</au><au>MAIER, M</au><au>MÜLLER, P. E</au><au>SCHULZ, C</au><au>DÜRR, H. R</au><au>TROUILLIER, H</au><au>STEINBORN, M</au><au>JANSSON, V</au><au>REFIOR, H. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resurfacing knee arthroplasty in patients with allergic sensitivity to metals</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>139-143</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>The problem of metal sensitivity (Ni, Cr, and Co) in arthroplasty is still unsolved. To prevent the risk of allergy in cases with proved metal allergy in an epicutaneous test, a Natural Knee total knee arthroplasty, made totally from titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) and polyethylene, can be implanted. The results of this device have to be compared to the results of normal knee arthroplasty designed with a femoral component out of CrCoNi alloy. The mechanical resistance of this alloy is much higher than that of titanium, and therefore it is the standard for the femoral components of most knee-resurfacing devices.
Thirty-five patients with a titanium Natural Knee were examined retrospectively after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 5 months (range 6 months to 5 years and 4 months). In comparison, 36 patients with a Genesis-I knee with a CrCoNi alloy femoral component were studied after a mean follow-up of 2 years and 4 months (range 8 months to 6 years and 2 months).
In spite of the lower mechanical resistance of titanium, the Natural Knee showed better results (knee score 84.1 points, function score 77.7 points, HSS score 80.1 points, 82.9% excellent and good results) than the Genesis-I knee (knee score 80.6 points, function score 76.4 points, HSS score 76.4 points, 68.5% excellent and good results), although these differences had no statistical significance.
The titanium Natural Knee prosthesis has proven to be a reliable knee joint replacement in the medium term.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12687388</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-002-0429-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2003-05, Vol.123 (4), p.139-143 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2261987449 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Biological and medical sciences Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Hypersensitivity - etiology Hypersensitivity - surgery Joint surgery Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects Male Medical sciences Metals - adverse effects Middle Aged Orthopedic surgery Postoperative Complications - surgery Prosthesis Design Recovery of Function Reoperation Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Time Factors Titanium Treatment Outcome |
title | Resurfacing knee arthroplasty in patients with allergic sensitivity to metals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resurfacing%20knee%20arthroplasty%20in%20patients%20with%20allergic%20sensitivity%20to%20metals&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=PELLENGAHR,%20C&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=139-143&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-002-0429-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261987449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-d1ce5a235c50d996167c99aafe63ce86ece4000c429fc016bfa18a1ef75faf833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261987449&rft_id=info:pmid/12687388&rfr_iscdi=true |