Loading…

Combining attribute and variable data to monitor process variability: MIX S 2 control chart

The necessity to monitor process variability to maintain similar, but more economical, performance to that of the S2 control chart in terms of ARL1 is the motivation of this paper. In general, a sample of four to six units is used to build an S2 control chart. Reducing the sample size to two or thre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2016-12, Vol.87 (9-12), p.3389-3396
Main Authors: Ho, Linda Lee, da Costa Quinino, Roberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1466-4dd796bca313b2d7f8d6724b2be109c2483c33f6d2f69a96f7183450be31c7853
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1466-4dd796bca313b2d7f8d6724b2be109c2483c33f6d2f69a96f7183450be31c7853
container_end_page 3396
container_issue 9-12
container_start_page 3389
container_title International journal of advanced manufacturing technology
container_volume 87
creator Ho, Linda Lee
da Costa Quinino, Roberto
description The necessity to monitor process variability to maintain similar, but more economical, performance to that of the S2 control chart in terms of ARL1 is the motivation of this paper. In general, a sample of four to six units is used to build an S2 control chart. Reducing the sample size to two or three units is a possibility, but the performance will be poor (in terms of ARL1), and the project specification may not be met. Additional cost would be required to remove the nonconforming units before shipment to the customers. This would compromise the quality of products in an environment of high worldwide competitiveness. The aim of this paper is to present the MIX S2 control chart, which employs a two-phase control chart to monitor the variability. At every interval of h hours, each unit is sequentially classified as approved or rejected by employing a Go/No Go ring gauge. A unit is approved if its dimension lies in [LDL; UDL], where L(U)DL is the lower(upper) discriminant limit; otherwise, it is rejected. If A1-approved items are first observed, then the production continues. However, if B1-rejected items are first observed, then n (n 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00170-016-8702-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2262355356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880833879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1466-4dd796bca313b2d7f8d6724b2be109c2483c33f6d2f69a96f7183450be31c7853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQgOEgCtbqD_AW8BxNMpuP9SbFj0LFgwqCh5DNZjVlu6lJKvTfu6U9e5rLw8zwInTJ6DWjVN1kSpmihDJJtKKciCM0YRUAAcrEMZpQLjUBJfUpOst5OWrJpJ6gz1lcNWEIwxe2paTQbIrHdmjxr03BNr3HrS0Wl4hXcQglJrxO0fmcDyD0oWxv8fP8A79ijl0cSoo9dt82lXN00tk--4vDnKL3h_u32RNZvDzOZ3cL4lglJanaVtWycRYYNLxVnW6l4lXDG89o7XilwQF0suWdrG0tO8U0VII2HphTWsAUXe33jq_9bHwuZhk3aRhPGs4lByFAyP8U05pqAK3qUbG9cinmnHxn1imsbNoaRs2utNmXNmNAsyttBPwBLJ1vMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262355356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining attribute and variable data to monitor process variability: MIX S 2 control chart</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Ho, Linda Lee ; da Costa Quinino, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, Linda Lee ; da Costa Quinino, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>The necessity to monitor process variability to maintain similar, but more economical, performance to that of the S2 control chart in terms of ARL1 is the motivation of this paper. In general, a sample of four to six units is used to build an S2 control chart. Reducing the sample size to two or three units is a possibility, but the performance will be poor (in terms of ARL1), and the project specification may not be met. Additional cost would be required to remove the nonconforming units before shipment to the customers. This would compromise the quality of products in an environment of high worldwide competitiveness. The aim of this paper is to present the MIX S2 control chart, which employs a two-phase control chart to monitor the variability. At every interval of h hours, each unit is sequentially classified as approved or rejected by employing a Go/No Go ring gauge. A unit is approved if its dimension lies in [LDL; UDL], where L(U)DL is the lower(upper) discriminant limit; otherwise, it is rejected. If A1-approved items are first observed, then the production continues. However, if B1-rejected items are first observed, then n (n &lt; 5) complementary units are taken, and the quality characteristics are measured to calculate the sample variance S2. If S2 is greater than the control limit, then the process is stopped for adjustment; otherwise, the production continues. The MIX S2 chart employs mixed control charts (attribute and variable) with the aim to find optimized parameters—LDL, UDL, A1, B1, and CL—such that similar values to ARL1 (and average sample size) are provided at a lower cost than the S2 control chart.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8702-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Control charts ; Mathematical analysis ; Phase control ; Project specifications</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2016-12, Vol.87 (9-12), p.3389-3396</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2016</rights><rights>The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1466-4dd796bca313b2d7f8d6724b2be109c2483c33f6d2f69a96f7183450be31c7853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1466-4dd796bca313b2d7f8d6724b2be109c2483c33f6d2f69a96f7183450be31c7853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, Linda Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa Quinino, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>Combining attribute and variable data to monitor process variability: MIX S 2 control chart</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><description>The necessity to monitor process variability to maintain similar, but more economical, performance to that of the S2 control chart in terms of ARL1 is the motivation of this paper. In general, a sample of four to six units is used to build an S2 control chart. Reducing the sample size to two or three units is a possibility, but the performance will be poor (in terms of ARL1), and the project specification may not be met. Additional cost would be required to remove the nonconforming units before shipment to the customers. This would compromise the quality of products in an environment of high worldwide competitiveness. The aim of this paper is to present the MIX S2 control chart, which employs a two-phase control chart to monitor the variability. At every interval of h hours, each unit is sequentially classified as approved or rejected by employing a Go/No Go ring gauge. A unit is approved if its dimension lies in [LDL; UDL], where L(U)DL is the lower(upper) discriminant limit; otherwise, it is rejected. If A1-approved items are first observed, then the production continues. However, if B1-rejected items are first observed, then n (n &lt; 5) complementary units are taken, and the quality characteristics are measured to calculate the sample variance S2. If S2 is greater than the control limit, then the process is stopped for adjustment; otherwise, the production continues. The MIX S2 chart employs mixed control charts (attribute and variable) with the aim to find optimized parameters—LDL, UDL, A1, B1, and CL—such that similar values to ARL1 (and average sample size) are provided at a lower cost than the S2 control chart.</description><subject>Control charts</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Phase control</subject><subject>Project specifications</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQgOEgCtbqD_AW8BxNMpuP9SbFj0LFgwqCh5DNZjVlu6lJKvTfu6U9e5rLw8zwInTJ6DWjVN1kSpmihDJJtKKciCM0YRUAAcrEMZpQLjUBJfUpOst5OWrJpJ6gz1lcNWEIwxe2paTQbIrHdmjxr03BNr3HrS0Wl4hXcQglJrxO0fmcDyD0oWxv8fP8A79ijl0cSoo9dt82lXN00tk--4vDnKL3h_u32RNZvDzOZ3cL4lglJanaVtWycRYYNLxVnW6l4lXDG89o7XilwQF0suWdrG0tO8U0VII2HphTWsAUXe33jq_9bHwuZhk3aRhPGs4lByFAyP8U05pqAK3qUbG9cinmnHxn1imsbNoaRs2utNmXNmNAsyttBPwBLJ1vMw</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Ho, Linda Lee</creator><creator>da Costa Quinino, Roberto</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Combining attribute and variable data to monitor process variability: MIX S 2 control chart</title><author>Ho, Linda Lee ; da Costa Quinino, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1466-4dd796bca313b2d7f8d6724b2be109c2483c33f6d2f69a96f7183450be31c7853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Control charts</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Phase control</topic><topic>Project specifications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Linda Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa Quinino, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Linda Lee</au><au>da Costa Quinino, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining attribute and variable data to monitor process variability: MIX S 2 control chart</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>9-12</issue><spage>3389</spage><epage>3396</epage><pages>3389-3396</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>The necessity to monitor process variability to maintain similar, but more economical, performance to that of the S2 control chart in terms of ARL1 is the motivation of this paper. In general, a sample of four to six units is used to build an S2 control chart. Reducing the sample size to two or three units is a possibility, but the performance will be poor (in terms of ARL1), and the project specification may not be met. Additional cost would be required to remove the nonconforming units before shipment to the customers. This would compromise the quality of products in an environment of high worldwide competitiveness. The aim of this paper is to present the MIX S2 control chart, which employs a two-phase control chart to monitor the variability. At every interval of h hours, each unit is sequentially classified as approved or rejected by employing a Go/No Go ring gauge. A unit is approved if its dimension lies in [LDL; UDL], where L(U)DL is the lower(upper) discriminant limit; otherwise, it is rejected. If A1-approved items are first observed, then the production continues. However, if B1-rejected items are first observed, then n (n &lt; 5) complementary units are taken, and the quality characteristics are measured to calculate the sample variance S2. If S2 is greater than the control limit, then the process is stopped for adjustment; otherwise, the production continues. The MIX S2 chart employs mixed control charts (attribute and variable) with the aim to find optimized parameters—LDL, UDL, A1, B1, and CL—such that similar values to ARL1 (and average sample size) are provided at a lower cost than the S2 control chart.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-016-8702-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3768
ispartof International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2016-12, Vol.87 (9-12), p.3389-3396
issn 0268-3768
1433-3015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2262355356
source Springer Nature
subjects Control charts
Mathematical analysis
Phase control
Project specifications
title Combining attribute and variable data to monitor process variability: MIX S 2 control chart
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A44%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20attribute%20and%20variable%20data%20to%20monitor%20process%20variability:%20MIX%20S%202%20control%20chart&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Ho,%20Linda%20Lee&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=9-12&rft.spage=3389&rft.epage=3396&rft.pages=3389-3396&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-016-8702-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880833879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1466-4dd796bca313b2d7f8d6724b2be109c2483c33f6d2f69a96f7183450be31c7853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262355356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true