Loading…

Evaluating the Effect of Geometry and Control on Freeway Merge Bottleneck Capacity

This paper evaluates the impact of geometric and operational features on freeway capacity at merge bottleneck locations, by analyzing pre-breakdown flow rates and using parametric and non-parametric techniques. These features include number of lanes, free-flow speed or speed limit, length of acceler...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2019-07
Main Authors: Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin, Kondyli, Alexandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin
Kondyli, Alexandra
description This paper evaluates the impact of geometric and operational features on freeway capacity at merge bottleneck locations, by analyzing pre-breakdown flow rates and using parametric and non-parametric techniques. These features include number of lanes, free-flow speed or speed limit, length of acceleration lane, and presence or ramp metering. The analysis was carried out on seventeen freeway merge sites across the United States. The number of lanes showed negative relationship with the per-lane average pre-breakdown flow rate. Sites equipped with ramp meters also showed higher pre-breakdown flow rates than unmetered sites. In survival analysis, the number of lanes and presence of ramp meters were the only features found to have a statistically significant impact on the survival (or breakdown) probability. Capacities, defined at the flow rate that corresponds to 15 percent breakdown probability, were 2,048, 1,959, and 1,745 pc/hr/ln at three-lane, four-lane, and five-lane unmetered sites, respectively. Capacities were 2,248 pc/hr/ln at three-lane and 2,132 pc/hr/ln at four-lane metered sites. The effect of acceleration lane length and Free Flow Speed (FFS) on pre-breakdown flow rate and survival probability was not found to be significant.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2262977434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2262977434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22629774343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0OgjAUQOHGxESivMNNnEmw5UdXCejiYtxJg7cI1hbbi4a318EHcDrDd2Ys4EJsom3C-YKF3vdxHPMs52kqAnYuX1KPkjrTAt0QSqWwIbAKDmgfSG4Caa5QWEPOarAGKof4lhOc0LUIe0uk0WBzh0IOsuloWrG5ktpj-OuSravyUhyjwdnniJ7q3o7OfKnmPOO7PE9EIv67PqhFPz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262977434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the Effect of Geometry and Control on Freeway Merge Bottleneck Capacity</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin ; Kondyli, Alexandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin ; Kondyli, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>This paper evaluates the impact of geometric and operational features on freeway capacity at merge bottleneck locations, by analyzing pre-breakdown flow rates and using parametric and non-parametric techniques. These features include number of lanes, free-flow speed or speed limit, length of acceleration lane, and presence or ramp metering. The analysis was carried out on seventeen freeway merge sites across the United States. The number of lanes showed negative relationship with the per-lane average pre-breakdown flow rate. Sites equipped with ramp meters also showed higher pre-breakdown flow rates than unmetered sites. In survival analysis, the number of lanes and presence of ramp meters were the only features found to have a statistically significant impact on the survival (or breakdown) probability. Capacities, defined at the flow rate that corresponds to 15 percent breakdown probability, were 2,048, 1,959, and 1,745 pc/hr/ln at three-lane, four-lane, and five-lane unmetered sites, respectively. Capacities were 2,248 pc/hr/ln at three-lane and 2,132 pc/hr/ln at four-lane metered sites. The effect of acceleration lane length and Free Flow Speed (FFS) on pre-breakdown flow rate and survival probability was not found to be significant.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Breakdown ; Flow velocity ; Free flow ; Highways ; Measuring instruments ; Paths ; Prebreakdown ; Roads &amp; highways ; Survival ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2019-07</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2262977434?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondyli, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the Effect of Geometry and Control on Freeway Merge Bottleneck Capacity</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>This paper evaluates the impact of geometric and operational features on freeway capacity at merge bottleneck locations, by analyzing pre-breakdown flow rates and using parametric and non-parametric techniques. These features include number of lanes, free-flow speed or speed limit, length of acceleration lane, and presence or ramp metering. The analysis was carried out on seventeen freeway merge sites across the United States. The number of lanes showed negative relationship with the per-lane average pre-breakdown flow rate. Sites equipped with ramp meters also showed higher pre-breakdown flow rates than unmetered sites. In survival analysis, the number of lanes and presence of ramp meters were the only features found to have a statistically significant impact on the survival (or breakdown) probability. Capacities, defined at the flow rate that corresponds to 15 percent breakdown probability, were 2,048, 1,959, and 1,745 pc/hr/ln at three-lane, four-lane, and five-lane unmetered sites, respectively. Capacities were 2,248 pc/hr/ln at three-lane and 2,132 pc/hr/ln at four-lane metered sites. The effect of acceleration lane length and Free Flow Speed (FFS) on pre-breakdown flow rate and survival probability was not found to be significant.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Breakdown</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Free flow</subject><subject>Highways</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Paths</subject><subject>Prebreakdown</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0OgjAUQOHGxESivMNNnEmw5UdXCejiYtxJg7cI1hbbi4a318EHcDrDd2Ys4EJsom3C-YKF3vdxHPMs52kqAnYuX1KPkjrTAt0QSqWwIbAKDmgfSG4Caa5QWEPOarAGKof4lhOc0LUIe0uk0WBzh0IOsuloWrG5ktpj-OuSravyUhyjwdnniJ7q3o7OfKnmPOO7PE9EIv67PqhFPz8</recordid><startdate>20190722</startdate><enddate>20190722</enddate><creator>Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin</creator><creator>Kondyli, Alexandra</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190722</creationdate><title>Evaluating the Effect of Geometry and Control on Freeway Merge Bottleneck Capacity</title><author>Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin ; Kondyli, Alexandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22629774343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Breakdown</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Free flow</topic><topic>Highways</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Paths</topic><topic>Prebreakdown</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondyli, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asgharzadeh, Mohamadamin</au><au>Kondyli, Alexandra</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the Effect of Geometry and Control on Freeway Merge Bottleneck Capacity</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2019-07-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>This paper evaluates the impact of geometric and operational features on freeway capacity at merge bottleneck locations, by analyzing pre-breakdown flow rates and using parametric and non-parametric techniques. These features include number of lanes, free-flow speed or speed limit, length of acceleration lane, and presence or ramp metering. The analysis was carried out on seventeen freeway merge sites across the United States. The number of lanes showed negative relationship with the per-lane average pre-breakdown flow rate. Sites equipped with ramp meters also showed higher pre-breakdown flow rates than unmetered sites. In survival analysis, the number of lanes and presence of ramp meters were the only features found to have a statistically significant impact on the survival (or breakdown) probability. Capacities, defined at the flow rate that corresponds to 15 percent breakdown probability, were 2,048, 1,959, and 1,745 pc/hr/ln at three-lane, four-lane, and five-lane unmetered sites, respectively. Capacities were 2,248 pc/hr/ln at three-lane and 2,132 pc/hr/ln at four-lane metered sites. The effect of acceleration lane length and Free Flow Speed (FFS) on pre-breakdown flow rate and survival probability was not found to be significant.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2019-07
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2262977434
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Acceleration
Breakdown
Flow velocity
Free flow
Highways
Measuring instruments
Paths
Prebreakdown
Roads & highways
Survival
Survival analysis
title Evaluating the Effect of Geometry and Control on Freeway Merge Bottleneck Capacity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20Effect%20of%20Geometry%20and%20Control%20on%20Freeway%20Merge%20Bottleneck%20Capacity&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Asgharzadeh,%20Mohamadamin&rft.date=2019-07-22&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2262977434%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22629774343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262977434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true