Loading…
Correction to: Moving Beyond Global Warming Potentials to Quantify the Climatic Role of Ecosystems
In our 2015 paper, we dropped the e ( − dt / τ ) term from Equations (1) and (2) when an ecosystem removed CH 4 or N 2 O from the atmosphere, reasoning that greenhouse gases that are not in the atmosphere cannot undergo atmospheric oxidation or photolysis. The flaw in this logic is that the uptake o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecosystems (New York) 2019-12, Vol.22 (8), p.1931-1932 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In our 2015 paper, we dropped the
e
(
− dt
/
τ
)
term from Equations (1) and (2) when an ecosystem removed CH
4
or N
2
O from the atmosphere, reasoning that greenhouse gases that are not in the atmosphere cannot undergo atmospheric oxidation or photolysis. The flaw in this logic is that the uptake of greenhouse gases by an ecosystem has the effect of reducing the pool of bulk atmospheric greenhouse gases and, consequently, lowering the decay rate of those gases. This violates our implicit assumption that the pool of bulk atmospheric greenhouse gases is in steady state and not affected by the ecosystem. To account for this, the
e
(
− dt
/
τ
)
term needs to remain in the model, with the result that the exact same equation is used when an ecosystem exhibits sustained greenhouse gas emissions or uptake. We thank Paavo Ojanen for bringing this error to our attention. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1432-9840 1435-0629 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10021-019-00422-5 |