Loading…
Building collaboration in the co-production of knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities about their everyday use of city space
We engage with scholarship in participatory geographies and critical disability studies to consider the difficulties and prospects of co-producing knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities in a project examining their uses of urban public space. The research employed an inclusive, collabo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Area (London 1969) 2019-09, Vol.51 (3), p.415-422 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-45dc90c2bf49e1431df85d59582961ec596615193c261dd6709dd0f4bbb484a43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-45dc90c2bf49e1431df85d59582961ec596615193c261dd6709dd0f4bbb484a43 |
container_end_page | 422 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 415 |
container_title | Area (London 1969) |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Schormans, Ann Fudge Wilton, Robert Marquis, Nick |
description | We engage with scholarship in participatory geographies and critical disability studies to consider the difficulties and prospects of co-producing knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities in a project examining their uses of urban public space. The research employed an inclusive, collaborative design and had an explicit focus on social change, articulated in the research process (e.g., the development of research and self-advocacy skills) and outcomes (e.g., lobbying to improve material conditions, challenging ableist assumptions about "intellectual disability"). Our analysis highlights three tensions: the time/spaces constraints faced in "slow" participatory work, the nature and duration of relationships among collaborators and the shifting relations of power and influence within the project. We reflect critically on how these tensions were negotiated and what lessons might be learned for participatory practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/area.12492 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2267319733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45172215</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45172215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-45dc90c2bf49e1431df85d59582961ec596615193c261dd6709dd0f4bbb484a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVIIdO0mzyBoGRTcKpfe7SchElbCBRKuxaydJ1oolqOJGfwK-SpY2cS6CraSPfwnXPRQeiMkgs6n28mgbmgTCh2hFZUNLISTc2O0YoQIiqyVuIEfcx5t4y1JCv0dDn64Hx_i20MwbQxmeJjj32Pyx3MYjWk6Eb7IsYO3_dxH8DdAt77cocHiEN4ffu-QAhgy2gCdj6b1gdfPGQ8x45lyfMJwyOkyZkJjxmWQOvLhPNgLHxCHzoTMnx-vU_R3-vtn6sf1c2v7z-vNjeV5ZyySkhnFbGs7YQCKjh13Vo6qeSaqZqClaquqaSKW1ZT5-qGKOdIJ9q2FWthBD9FXw65888eRshF7-KY-nmlZqxuOFUN5zP19UDZFHNO0Okh-X8mTZoSvXStl671S9czTA_w3geY3iH15vd28-Y5P3h2ucT0v4dx0mghacMYlfwZXnGPCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267319733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building collaboration in the co-production of knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities about their everyday use of city space</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Schormans, Ann Fudge ; Wilton, Robert ; Marquis, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>Schormans, Ann Fudge ; Wilton, Robert ; Marquis, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>We engage with scholarship in participatory geographies and critical disability studies to consider the difficulties and prospects of co-producing knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities in a project examining their uses of urban public space. The research employed an inclusive, collaborative design and had an explicit focus on social change, articulated in the research process (e.g., the development of research and self-advocacy skills) and outcomes (e.g., lobbying to improve material conditions, challenging ableist assumptions about "intellectual disability"). Our analysis highlights three tensions: the time/spaces constraints faced in "slow" participatory work, the nature and duration of relationships among collaborators and the shifting relations of power and influence within the project. We reflect critically on how these tensions were negotiated and what lessons might be learned for participatory practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/area.12492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Canada ; city space ; Collaboration ; co‐production ; Disability studies ; inclusive research ; Intellectual disabilities ; intellectual disability ; Knowledge management ; Lobbying ; Power ; Prospects ; Public spaces ; Self-advocacy ; SPECIAL SECTION: GEOGRAPHIES OF CO-PRODUCTION: LEARNING FROM INCLUSIVE RESEARCH APPROACHES AT THE MARGINS ; technology</subject><ispartof>Area (London 1969), 2019-09, Vol.51 (3), p.415-422</ispartof><rights>2019 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</rights><rights>The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG). © 2018 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-45dc90c2bf49e1431df85d59582961ec596615193c261dd6709dd0f4bbb484a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-45dc90c2bf49e1431df85d59582961ec596615193c261dd6709dd0f4bbb484a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7892-3599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schormans, Ann Fudge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilton, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquis, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>Building collaboration in the co-production of knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities about their everyday use of city space</title><title>Area (London 1969)</title><description>We engage with scholarship in participatory geographies and critical disability studies to consider the difficulties and prospects of co-producing knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities in a project examining their uses of urban public space. The research employed an inclusive, collaborative design and had an explicit focus on social change, articulated in the research process (e.g., the development of research and self-advocacy skills) and outcomes (e.g., lobbying to improve material conditions, challenging ableist assumptions about "intellectual disability"). Our analysis highlights three tensions: the time/spaces constraints faced in "slow" participatory work, the nature and duration of relationships among collaborators and the shifting relations of power and influence within the project. We reflect critically on how these tensions were negotiated and what lessons might be learned for participatory practice.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>city space</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>co‐production</subject><subject>Disability studies</subject><subject>inclusive research</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>intellectual disability</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Self-advocacy</subject><subject>SPECIAL SECTION: GEOGRAPHIES OF CO-PRODUCTION: LEARNING FROM INCLUSIVE RESEARCH APPROACHES AT THE MARGINS</subject><subject>technology</subject><issn>0004-0894</issn><issn>1475-4762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVIIdO0mzyBoGRTcKpfe7SchElbCBRKuxaydJ1oolqOJGfwK-SpY2cS6CraSPfwnXPRQeiMkgs6n28mgbmgTCh2hFZUNLISTc2O0YoQIiqyVuIEfcx5t4y1JCv0dDn64Hx_i20MwbQxmeJjj32Pyx3MYjWk6Eb7IsYO3_dxH8DdAt77cocHiEN4ffu-QAhgy2gCdj6b1gdfPGQ8x45lyfMJwyOkyZkJjxmWQOvLhPNgLHxCHzoTMnx-vU_R3-vtn6sf1c2v7z-vNjeV5ZyySkhnFbGs7YQCKjh13Vo6qeSaqZqClaquqaSKW1ZT5-qGKOdIJ9q2FWthBD9FXw65888eRshF7-KY-nmlZqxuOFUN5zP19UDZFHNO0Okh-X8mTZoSvXStl671S9czTA_w3geY3iH15vd28-Y5P3h2ucT0v4dx0mghacMYlfwZXnGPCA</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Schormans, Ann Fudge</creator><creator>Wilton, Robert</creator><creator>Marquis, Nick</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-3599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Building collaboration in the co-production of knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities about their everyday use of city space</title><author>Schormans, Ann Fudge ; Wilton, Robert ; Marquis, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-45dc90c2bf49e1431df85d59582961ec596615193c261dd6709dd0f4bbb484a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>city space</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>co‐production</topic><topic>Disability studies</topic><topic>inclusive research</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>intellectual disability</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Self-advocacy</topic><topic>SPECIAL SECTION: GEOGRAPHIES OF CO-PRODUCTION: LEARNING FROM INCLUSIVE RESEARCH APPROACHES AT THE MARGINS</topic><topic>technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schormans, Ann Fudge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilton, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquis, Nick</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Area (London 1969)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schormans, Ann Fudge</au><au>Wilton, Robert</au><au>Marquis, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building collaboration in the co-production of knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities about their everyday use of city space</atitle><jtitle>Area (London 1969)</jtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>415-422</pages><issn>0004-0894</issn><eissn>1475-4762</eissn><abstract>We engage with scholarship in participatory geographies and critical disability studies to consider the difficulties and prospects of co-producing knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities in a project examining their uses of urban public space. The research employed an inclusive, collaborative design and had an explicit focus on social change, articulated in the research process (e.g., the development of research and self-advocacy skills) and outcomes (e.g., lobbying to improve material conditions, challenging ableist assumptions about "intellectual disability"). Our analysis highlights three tensions: the time/spaces constraints faced in "slow" participatory work, the nature and duration of relationships among collaborators and the shifting relations of power and influence within the project. We reflect critically on how these tensions were negotiated and what lessons might be learned for participatory practice.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/area.12492</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-3599</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0894 |
ispartof | Area (London 1969), 2019-09, Vol.51 (3), p.415-422 |
issn | 0004-0894 1475-4762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2267319733 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley; SPORTDiscus with Full Text |
subjects | Canada city space Collaboration co‐production Disability studies inclusive research Intellectual disabilities intellectual disability Knowledge management Lobbying Power Prospects Public spaces Self-advocacy SPECIAL SECTION: GEOGRAPHIES OF CO-PRODUCTION: LEARNING FROM INCLUSIVE RESEARCH APPROACHES AT THE MARGINS technology |
title | Building collaboration in the co-production of knowledge with people with intellectual disabilities about their everyday use of city space |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20collaboration%20in%20the%20co-production%20of%20knowledge%20with%20people%20with%20intellectual%20disabilities%20about%20their%20everyday%20use%20of%20city%20space&rft.jtitle=Area%20(London%201969)&rft.au=Schormans,%20Ann%20Fudge&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=415-422&rft.issn=0004-0894&rft.eissn=1475-4762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/area.12492&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45172215%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3312-45dc90c2bf49e1431df85d59582961ec596615193c261dd6709dd0f4bbb484a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267319733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45172215&rfr_iscdi=true |