Sugarcane Straw Removal: Implications to Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Demand in Brazil

Sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) straw is a promising feedstock for bioelectricity and cellulosic ethanol in Brazil, but some straw is also needed to sustain nutrient cycling and crop yields. A literature review and two field studies were conducted to quantify above-ground macronutrient accumul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioenergy research 2019-12, Vol.12 (4), p.888-900
Main Authors: Cherubin, Maurício R., Lisboa, Izaias P., Silva, Aijânio G. B., Varanda, Letícia L., Bordonal, Ricardo O., Carvalho, João L. N., Otto, Rafael, Pavinato, Paulo S., Soltangheisi, Amin, Cerri, Carlos E. P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Bioelectricity
Biomass
Biomass energy
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Calcium
Compound fertilizers
Crop yield
Economics
Ethanol
Fertilizers
Harvesting
Hydroxyapatite
Leaves
Life Sciences
Literature reviews
Magnesium
Nutrient cycles
Nutrients
Plant Breeding/Biotechnology
Plant Ecology
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Plant Sciences
Renewable energy
Saccharum officinarum
Soil fertility
Straw
Sugar
Sugarcane
Sustainable energy
Sustainable production
Wood Science & Technology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-f26b17512bee0af289c131efa6ccc2be688555fef810ce90ee0b4d1b398a5d903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-f26b17512bee0af289c131efa6ccc2be688555fef810ce90ee0b4d1b398a5d903
container_end_page 900
container_issue 4
container_start_page 888
container_title Bioenergy research
container_volume 12
creator Cherubin, Maurício R.
Lisboa, Izaias P.
Silva, Aijânio G. B.
Varanda, Letícia L.
Bordonal, Ricardo O.
Carvalho, João L. N.
Otto, Rafael
Pavinato, Paulo S.
Soltangheisi, Amin
Cerri, Carlos E. P.
description Sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) straw is a promising feedstock for bioelectricity and cellulosic ethanol in Brazil, but some straw is also needed to sustain nutrient cycling and crop yields. A literature review and two field studies were conducted to quantify above-ground macronutrient accumulation by sugarcane. Five straw removal scenarios using different amounts of biomass and nutrient composition data of top (green) and bottom (dry) leaves were constructed to estimate fertilizer requirements associated with straw removal in central southern Brazil. Calculated straw removal for five scenarios (S1 to S5) was 3.5, 7, 3, 6, and 12 Mg ha −1 , respectively. By removing 12 Mg ha −1 of straw (S5), the potential N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S removal was 69, 7, 92, 45, 16, and 14 kg ha −1 , respectively. It represents a nutrient (NPK) replacement cost of US$ 90.00 ha −1 or US$ 7.60 per Mg of removed straw. The scenario analysis shows that less-impacting strategies are those that maintain top leaves in the field and harvesting only bottom leaves (S1 and S2), whereas total removal (S5) could double NPK-fertilizer consumption in sugarcane fields by 2050. Our findings provide stakeholder guidelines for improved straw management, establish an economic value for accumulated plant nutrients, and promote both socio-economic and environmental benefits of more sustainable bioenergy production in Brazil.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12155-019-10021-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2267588054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712242001</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712242001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-f26b17512bee0af289c131efa6ccc2be688555fef810ce90ee0b4d1b398a5d903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAYhYsoOKd_wKuA19UkbbrGuzmdDgaCU7wMafpmZLTNTDrH9uvNrDoEkVwk53CefJ0oOif4kmA8uPKEEsZiTHgcNCXx-iDqEZ4ESVN6-LNO0uPoxPsFxhlOMe9Fr7PVXDolG0Cz1sk1eoLavsvqGk3qZWWUbI1tPGotmllToTG41lSm3SDZlN9qCw7dQr1zTINunNya6jQ60rLycPY196OX8d3z6CGePt5PRsNprNKUt7GmWUEGjNACAEtNc65IQkDLTCkVzCzPGWMadE6wAo5DqkhLUiQ8l6zkOOlHF92-S2ffVuBbsbAr14QjBaXZgOU5Zuk-NZcVCNNoG96qauOVGA4IDV-EMQmpyz9SYZRQG2Ub0Cb4vwDaAcpZ7x1osXSmlm4jCBa7XkTXiwi9iM9exDpASQf5EG7m4PY3_of6ANn5j4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267588054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sugarcane Straw Removal: Implications to Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Demand in Brazil</title><source>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Cherubin, Maurício R. ; Lisboa, Izaias P. ; Silva, Aijânio G. B. ; Varanda, Letícia L. ; Bordonal, Ricardo O. ; Carvalho, João L. N. ; Otto, Rafael ; Pavinato, Paulo S. ; Soltangheisi, Amin ; Cerri, Carlos E. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cherubin, Maurício R. ; Lisboa, Izaias P. ; Silva, Aijânio G. B. ; Varanda, Letícia L. ; Bordonal, Ricardo O. ; Carvalho, João L. N. ; Otto, Rafael ; Pavinato, Paulo S. ; Soltangheisi, Amin ; Cerri, Carlos E. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) straw is a promising feedstock for bioelectricity and cellulosic ethanol in Brazil, but some straw is also needed to sustain nutrient cycling and crop yields. A literature review and two field studies were conducted to quantify above-ground macronutrient accumulation by sugarcane. Five straw removal scenarios using different amounts of biomass and nutrient composition data of top (green) and bottom (dry) leaves were constructed to estimate fertilizer requirements associated with straw removal in central southern Brazil. Calculated straw removal for five scenarios (S1 to S5) was 3.5, 7, 3, 6, and 12 Mg ha −1 , respectively. By removing 12 Mg ha −1 of straw (S5), the potential N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S removal was 69, 7, 92, 45, 16, and 14 kg ha −1 , respectively. It represents a nutrient (NPK) replacement cost of US$ 90.00 ha −1 or US$ 7.60 per Mg of removed straw. The scenario analysis shows that less-impacting strategies are those that maintain top leaves in the field and harvesting only bottom leaves (S1 and S2), whereas total removal (S5) could double NPK-fertilizer consumption in sugarcane fields by 2050. Our findings provide stakeholder guidelines for improved straw management, establish an economic value for accumulated plant nutrients, and promote both socio-economic and environmental benefits of more sustainable bioenergy production in Brazil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-1234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12155-019-10021-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bioelectricity ; Biomass ; Biomass energy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Calcium ; Compound fertilizers ; Crop yield ; Economics ; Ethanol ; Fertilizers ; Harvesting ; Hydroxyapatite ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; Magnesium ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrients ; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Sciences ; Renewable energy ; Saccharum officinarum ; Soil fertility ; Straw ; Sugar ; Sugarcane ; Sustainable energy ; Sustainable production ; Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>Bioenergy research, 2019-12, Vol.12 (4), p.888-900</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>BioEnergy Research is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-f26b17512bee0af289c131efa6ccc2be688555fef810ce90ee0b4d1b398a5d903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-f26b17512bee0af289c131efa6ccc2be688555fef810ce90ee0b4d1b398a5d903</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7920-8362</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2267588054/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2267588054?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cherubin, Maurício R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Izaias P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Aijânio G. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varanda, Letícia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordonal, Ricardo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, João L. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavinato, Paulo S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltangheisi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, Carlos E. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Sugarcane Straw Removal: Implications to Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Demand in Brazil</title><title>Bioenergy research</title><addtitle>Bioenerg. Res</addtitle><description>Sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) straw is a promising feedstock for bioelectricity and cellulosic ethanol in Brazil, but some straw is also needed to sustain nutrient cycling and crop yields. A literature review and two field studies were conducted to quantify above-ground macronutrient accumulation by sugarcane. Five straw removal scenarios using different amounts of biomass and nutrient composition data of top (green) and bottom (dry) leaves were constructed to estimate fertilizer requirements associated with straw removal in central southern Brazil. Calculated straw removal for five scenarios (S1 to S5) was 3.5, 7, 3, 6, and 12 Mg ha −1 , respectively. By removing 12 Mg ha −1 of straw (S5), the potential N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S removal was 69, 7, 92, 45, 16, and 14 kg ha −1 , respectively. It represents a nutrient (NPK) replacement cost of US$ 90.00 ha −1 or US$ 7.60 per Mg of removed straw. The scenario analysis shows that less-impacting strategies are those that maintain top leaves in the field and harvesting only bottom leaves (S1 and S2), whereas total removal (S5) could double NPK-fertilizer consumption in sugarcane fields by 2050. Our findings provide stakeholder guidelines for improved straw management, establish an economic value for accumulated plant nutrients, and promote both socio-economic and environmental benefits of more sustainable bioenergy production in Brazil.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bioelectricity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Compound fertilizers</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Saccharum officinarum</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Sustainable energy</subject><subject>Sustainable production</subject><subject>Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>1939-1234</issn><issn>1939-1242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAYhYsoOKd_wKuA19UkbbrGuzmdDgaCU7wMafpmZLTNTDrH9uvNrDoEkVwk53CefJ0oOif4kmA8uPKEEsZiTHgcNCXx-iDqEZ4ESVN6-LNO0uPoxPsFxhlOMe9Fr7PVXDolG0Cz1sk1eoLavsvqGk3qZWWUbI1tPGotmllToTG41lSm3SDZlN9qCw7dQr1zTINunNya6jQ60rLycPY196OX8d3z6CGePt5PRsNprNKUt7GmWUEGjNACAEtNc65IQkDLTCkVzCzPGWMadE6wAo5DqkhLUiQ8l6zkOOlHF92-S2ffVuBbsbAr14QjBaXZgOU5Zuk-NZcVCNNoG96qauOVGA4IDV-EMQmpyz9SYZRQG2Ub0Cb4vwDaAcpZ7x1osXSmlm4jCBa7XkTXiwi9iM9exDpASQf5EG7m4PY3_of6ANn5j4E</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Cherubin, Maurício R.</creator><creator>Lisboa, Izaias P.</creator><creator>Silva, Aijânio G. B.</creator><creator>Varanda, Letícia L.</creator><creator>Bordonal, Ricardo O.</creator><creator>Carvalho, João L. N.</creator><creator>Otto, Rafael</creator><creator>Pavinato, Paulo S.</creator><creator>Soltangheisi, Amin</creator><creator>Cerri, Carlos E. P.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7920-8362</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Sugarcane Straw Removal: Implications to Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Demand in Brazil</title><author>Cherubin, Maurício R. ; Lisboa, Izaias P. ; Silva, Aijânio G. B. ; Varanda, Letícia L. ; Bordonal, Ricardo O. ; Carvalho, João L. N. ; Otto, Rafael ; Pavinato, Paulo S. ; Soltangheisi, Amin ; Cerri, Carlos E. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-f26b17512bee0af289c131efa6ccc2be688555fef810ce90ee0b4d1b398a5d903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bioelectricity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Compound fertilizers</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Plant Breeding/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Saccharum officinarum</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Sustainable energy</topic><topic>Sustainable production</topic><topic>Wood Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cherubin, Maurício R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Izaias P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Aijânio G. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varanda, Letícia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordonal, Ricardo O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, João L. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavinato, Paulo S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltangheisi, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, Carlos E. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cherubin, Maurício R.</au><au>Lisboa, Izaias P.</au><au>Silva, Aijânio G. B.</au><au>Varanda, Letícia L.</au><au>Bordonal, Ricardo O.</au><au>Carvalho, João L. N.</au><au>Otto, Rafael</au><au>Pavinato, Paulo S.</au><au>Soltangheisi, Amin</au><au>Cerri, Carlos E. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sugarcane Straw Removal: Implications to Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Demand in Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Bioenergy research</jtitle><stitle>Bioenerg. Res</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>888</spage><epage>900</epage><pages>888-900</pages><issn>1939-1234</issn><eissn>1939-1242</eissn><abstract>Sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) straw is a promising feedstock for bioelectricity and cellulosic ethanol in Brazil, but some straw is also needed to sustain nutrient cycling and crop yields. A literature review and two field studies were conducted to quantify above-ground macronutrient accumulation by sugarcane. Five straw removal scenarios using different amounts of biomass and nutrient composition data of top (green) and bottom (dry) leaves were constructed to estimate fertilizer requirements associated with straw removal in central southern Brazil. Calculated straw removal for five scenarios (S1 to S5) was 3.5, 7, 3, 6, and 12 Mg ha −1 , respectively. By removing 12 Mg ha −1 of straw (S5), the potential N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S removal was 69, 7, 92, 45, 16, and 14 kg ha −1 , respectively. It represents a nutrient (NPK) replacement cost of US$ 90.00 ha −1 or US$ 7.60 per Mg of removed straw. The scenario analysis shows that less-impacting strategies are those that maintain top leaves in the field and harvesting only bottom leaves (S1 and S2), whereas total removal (S5) could double NPK-fertilizer consumption in sugarcane fields by 2050. Our findings provide stakeholder guidelines for improved straw management, establish an economic value for accumulated plant nutrients, and promote both socio-economic and environmental benefits of more sustainable bioenergy production in Brazil.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12155-019-10021-w</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7920-8362</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-1234
ispartof Bioenergy research, 2019-12, Vol.12 (4), p.888-900
issn 1939-1234
1939-1242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2267588054
source ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link
subjects Analysis
Bioelectricity
Biomass
Biomass energy
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Calcium
Compound fertilizers
Crop yield
Economics
Ethanol
Fertilizers
Harvesting
Hydroxyapatite
Leaves
Life Sciences
Literature reviews
Magnesium
Nutrient cycles
Nutrients
Plant Breeding/Biotechnology
Plant Ecology
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Plant Sciences
Renewable energy
Saccharum officinarum
Soil fertility
Straw
Sugar
Sugarcane
Sustainable energy
Sustainable production
Wood Science & Technology
title Sugarcane Straw Removal: Implications to Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Demand in Brazil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sugarcane%20Straw%20Removal:%20Implications%20to%20Soil%20Fertility%20and%20Fertilizer%20Demand%20in%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Bioenergy%20research&rft.au=Cherubin,%20Maur%C3%ADcio%20R.&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=888&rft.epage=900&rft.pages=888-900&rft.issn=1939-1234&rft.eissn=1939-1242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12155-019-10021-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA712242001%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-f26b17512bee0af289c131efa6ccc2be688555fef810ce90ee0b4d1b398a5d903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267588054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A712242001&rfr_iscdi=true