Loading…
Influence of training protocols on text input speed on a computer in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial
Study design Randomised controlled trial. Objectives To evaluate the impact of two different word prediction software (WPS) training protocols on text input speed (TIS) in people with tetraplegia and to determine which was the most effective. Setting Rehabilitation department, Garches, France. Metho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Spinal cord 2019-08, Vol.57 (8), p.636-643 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e31df6b490aa8c3d5121b2ac62624c8a0068ef110c9058a2966d9c64de28af2a3 |
container_end_page | 643 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 636 |
container_title | Spinal cord |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Pouplin, Samuel Bensmail, Djamel Vaugier, Isabelle Gelineau, Axelle Pottier, Sandra Roche, Nicolas |
description | Study design
Randomised controlled trial.
Objectives
To evaluate the impact of two different word prediction software (WPS) training protocols on text input speed (TIS) in people with tetraplegia and to determine which was the most effective.
Setting
Rehabilitation department, Garches, France.
Methods
Participants with neurological levels between C6 and C8 were allocated to one of three different groups. The REHAB group underwent training with an occupational therapist. The SELF group carried out a standardised home self-training with a written training guide. The CONTROL group had no training. Participants were assessed at day 15 (D15) and day 30 (D30). The primary outcome was a copying task with and without WPS (WITH and WITHOUT).
Results
Forty-two participants (mean age ± SD of 39.8 ± 12) were included and 38 completed the study. At D30, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in TIS between the CONTROL and SELF groups was 3.8 [−1.7 to 9.4] characters per minute (cpm) (
p
= 0.23), between the REHAB and SELF groups was 12.9 [7.4 to 18.4] cpm (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41393-019-0265-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2268063818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268063818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e31df6b490aa8c3d5121b2ac62624c8a0068ef110c9058a2966d9c64de28af2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UclKBDEQDaK4jH6AFwl4bs3SHRNvIm4geNFzyCTpMUNPMiZpl7_wk61hXE5CQRVV772k6iF0SMkJJVyelpZyxRtCVUOY6JpuA-3S9kw0nWDtJtRcsKYFyA7aK2VOCFFUyW20w4mkrRBqF33exX4YfbQepx7XbEIMcYaXOdVk01Bwirj694pDXI4Vl6X3btUz2KYFdHyGCYQLr8GNBghvoT5j6_NrsGYAQoiQbMoOUPMxf5wDN5vo0iIU0LIp1pyGAcqagxn20VYPMv7gO0_Q0_XV4-Vtc_9wc3d5cd9YLs5q4zl1vZi2ihgjLXcdZXTKjBUMVrfSECKk7yklVpFOGqaEcMqK1nkmTc8Mn6DjtS6s-jL6UvU8jRn-WjRjQhLBJZWAomuUzamU7Hu9zGFh8oemRK880GsPNHigVx7oDjhH38rjdOHdL-Pn6ABga0CBUZz5_Pf0_6pfCdKUcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268063818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of training protocols on text input speed on a computer in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Pouplin, Samuel ; Bensmail, Djamel ; Vaugier, Isabelle ; Gelineau, Axelle ; Pottier, Sandra ; Roche, Nicolas</creator><creatorcontrib>Pouplin, Samuel ; Bensmail, Djamel ; Vaugier, Isabelle ; Gelineau, Axelle ; Pottier, Sandra ; Roche, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><description>Study design
Randomised controlled trial.
Objectives
To evaluate the impact of two different word prediction software (WPS) training protocols on text input speed (TIS) in people with tetraplegia and to determine which was the most effective.
Setting
Rehabilitation department, Garches, France.
Methods
Participants with neurological levels between C6 and C8 were allocated to one of three different groups. The REHAB group underwent training with an occupational therapist. The SELF group carried out a standardised home self-training with a written training guide. The CONTROL group had no training. Participants were assessed at day 15 (D15) and day 30 (D30). The primary outcome was a copying task with and without WPS (WITH and WITHOUT).
Results
Forty-two participants (mean age ± SD of 39.8 ± 12) were included and 38 completed the study. At D30, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in TIS between the CONTROL and SELF groups was 3.8 [−1.7 to 9.4] characters per minute (cpm) (
p
= 0.23), between the REHAB and SELF groups was 12.9 [7.4 to 18.4] cpm (
p
< 0.001), and between the REHAB and CONTROL groups was 9.1 [3.5 to 14.6] cpm (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
The results of this study showed that occupational therapist-supervised training improved TIS but word prediction software did not increase TIS. These results suggest that supervised training should be provided to all individuals who are prescribed with devices and systems to facilitate computer access in order to increase their TIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0265-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30814669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/700/1719 ; 692/700/565/491 ; Adult ; Anatomy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cervical Cord - injuries ; Communication Aids for Disabled ; Computer programs ; Confidence intervals ; Copying ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Microcomputers ; Middle Aged ; Neurochemistry ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; Occupational Therapy - methods ; Protocol (computers) ; Quadriplegia - etiology ; Quadriplegia - physiopathology ; Quadriplegia - rehabilitation ; Randomization ; Rehabilitation ; Software ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - complications ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation ; Training</subject><ispartof>Spinal cord, 2019-08, Vol.57 (8), p.636-643</ispartof><rights>International Spinal Cord Society 2019</rights><rights>2019© International Spinal Cord Society 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e31df6b490aa8c3d5121b2ac62624c8a0068ef110c9058a2966d9c64de28af2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30814669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pouplin, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensmail, Djamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaugier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelineau, Axelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottier, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of training protocols on text input speed on a computer in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial</title><title>Spinal cord</title><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><description>Study design
Randomised controlled trial.
Objectives
To evaluate the impact of two different word prediction software (WPS) training protocols on text input speed (TIS) in people with tetraplegia and to determine which was the most effective.
Setting
Rehabilitation department, Garches, France.
Methods
Participants with neurological levels between C6 and C8 were allocated to one of three different groups. The REHAB group underwent training with an occupational therapist. The SELF group carried out a standardised home self-training with a written training guide. The CONTROL group had no training. Participants were assessed at day 15 (D15) and day 30 (D30). The primary outcome was a copying task with and without WPS (WITH and WITHOUT).
Results
Forty-two participants (mean age ± SD of 39.8 ± 12) were included and 38 completed the study. At D30, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in TIS between the CONTROL and SELF groups was 3.8 [−1.7 to 9.4] characters per minute (cpm) (
p
= 0.23), between the REHAB and SELF groups was 12.9 [7.4 to 18.4] cpm (
p
< 0.001), and between the REHAB and CONTROL groups was 9.1 [3.5 to 14.6] cpm (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
The results of this study showed that occupational therapist-supervised training improved TIS but word prediction software did not increase TIS. These results suggest that supervised training should be provided to all individuals who are prescribed with devices and systems to facilitate computer access in order to increase their TIS.</description><subject>692/700/1719</subject><subject>692/700/565/491</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cervical Cord - injuries</subject><subject>Communication Aids for Disabled</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Copying</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microcomputers</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurochemistry</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Protocol (computers)</subject><subject>Quadriplegia - etiology</subject><subject>Quadriplegia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Quadriplegia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1362-4393</issn><issn>1476-5624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UclKBDEQDaK4jH6AFwl4bs3SHRNvIm4geNFzyCTpMUNPMiZpl7_wk61hXE5CQRVV772k6iF0SMkJJVyelpZyxRtCVUOY6JpuA-3S9kw0nWDtJtRcsKYFyA7aK2VOCFFUyW20w4mkrRBqF33exX4YfbQepx7XbEIMcYaXOdVk01Bwirj694pDXI4Vl6X3btUz2KYFdHyGCYQLr8GNBghvoT5j6_NrsGYAQoiQbMoOUPMxf5wDN5vo0iIU0LIp1pyGAcqagxn20VYPMv7gO0_Q0_XV4-Vtc_9wc3d5cd9YLs5q4zl1vZi2ihgjLXcdZXTKjBUMVrfSECKk7yklVpFOGqaEcMqK1nkmTc8Mn6DjtS6s-jL6UvU8jRn-WjRjQhLBJZWAomuUzamU7Hu9zGFh8oemRK880GsPNHigVx7oDjhH38rjdOHdL-Pn6ABga0CBUZz5_Pf0_6pfCdKUcQ</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Pouplin, Samuel</creator><creator>Bensmail, Djamel</creator><creator>Vaugier, Isabelle</creator><creator>Gelineau, Axelle</creator><creator>Pottier, Sandra</creator><creator>Roche, Nicolas</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Influence of training protocols on text input speed on a computer in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial</title><author>Pouplin, Samuel ; Bensmail, Djamel ; Vaugier, Isabelle ; Gelineau, Axelle ; Pottier, Sandra ; Roche, Nicolas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e31df6b490aa8c3d5121b2ac62624c8a0068ef110c9058a2966d9c64de28af2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>692/700/1719</topic><topic>692/700/565/491</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cervical Cord - injuries</topic><topic>Communication Aids for Disabled</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Copying</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microcomputers</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurochemistry</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Protocol (computers)</topic><topic>Quadriplegia - etiology</topic><topic>Quadriplegia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Quadriplegia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pouplin, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensmail, Djamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaugier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelineau, Axelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottier, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pouplin, Samuel</au><au>Bensmail, Djamel</au><au>Vaugier, Isabelle</au><au>Gelineau, Axelle</au><au>Pottier, Sandra</au><au>Roche, Nicolas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of training protocols on text input speed on a computer in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle><stitle>Spinal Cord</stitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>636</spage><epage>643</epage><pages>636-643</pages><issn>1362-4393</issn><eissn>1476-5624</eissn><abstract>Study design
Randomised controlled trial.
Objectives
To evaluate the impact of two different word prediction software (WPS) training protocols on text input speed (TIS) in people with tetraplegia and to determine which was the most effective.
Setting
Rehabilitation department, Garches, France.
Methods
Participants with neurological levels between C6 and C8 were allocated to one of three different groups. The REHAB group underwent training with an occupational therapist. The SELF group carried out a standardised home self-training with a written training guide. The CONTROL group had no training. Participants were assessed at day 15 (D15) and day 30 (D30). The primary outcome was a copying task with and without WPS (WITH and WITHOUT).
Results
Forty-two participants (mean age ± SD of 39.8 ± 12) were included and 38 completed the study. At D30, the mean (95% confidence interval) difference in TIS between the CONTROL and SELF groups was 3.8 [−1.7 to 9.4] characters per minute (cpm) (
p
= 0.23), between the REHAB and SELF groups was 12.9 [7.4 to 18.4] cpm (
p
< 0.001), and between the REHAB and CONTROL groups was 9.1 [3.5 to 14.6] cpm (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
The results of this study showed that occupational therapist-supervised training improved TIS but word prediction software did not increase TIS. These results suggest that supervised training should be provided to all individuals who are prescribed with devices and systems to facilitate computer access in order to increase their TIS.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30814669</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41393-019-0265-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1362-4393 |
ispartof | Spinal cord, 2019-08, Vol.57 (8), p.636-643 |
issn | 1362-4393 1476-5624 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2268063818 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | 692/700/1719 692/700/565/491 Adult Anatomy Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cervical Cord - injuries Communication Aids for Disabled Computer programs Confidence intervals Copying Female Follow-Up Studies Human Physiology Humans Male Microcomputers Middle Aged Neurochemistry Neuropsychology Neurosciences Occupational Therapy - methods Protocol (computers) Quadriplegia - etiology Quadriplegia - physiopathology Quadriplegia - rehabilitation Randomization Rehabilitation Software Spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord Injuries - complications Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation Training |
title | Influence of training protocols on text input speed on a computer in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A39%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20training%20protocols%20on%20text%20input%20speed%20on%20a%20computer%20in%20individuals%20with%20cervical%20spinal%20cord%20injury:%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Spinal%20cord&rft.au=Pouplin,%20Samuel&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=636&rft.epage=643&rft.pages=636-643&rft.issn=1362-4393&rft.eissn=1476-5624&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41393-019-0265-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268063818%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-e31df6b490aa8c3d5121b2ac62624c8a0068ef110c9058a2966d9c64de28af2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268063818&rft_id=info:pmid/30814669&rfr_iscdi=true |