Loading…
Technology Transfer Under the PRC Antitrust Framework
According to the People's Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), 10,538 technology contracts were registered with MOFCOM with an aggregate value of US$22.02 billion in 2006, an increase of 15.6 percent from 2005. Fees received by foreign transferors of technology accounted for 6...
Saved in:
Published in: | Intellectual property & technology law journal 2008-11, Vol.20 (11), p.19 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Intellectual property & technology law journal |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Huang, John Z L Ma, Patrick |
description | According to the People's Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), 10,538 technology contracts were registered with MOFCOM with an aggregate value of US$22.02 billion in 2006, an increase of 15.6 percent from 2005. Fees received by foreign transferors of technology accounted for 67 percent of the total value i.e., US$14.76 billion). As the value of technology contracts has increased, so has the wariness of the government of the PRC of foreign participation in many key sectors and its perceived potential to create technology monopolies in China held by foreign interests. John Z.L. Huang and Patrick Ma explain that, for example, it is common practice for a foreign transferor to try to place substantial restrictions on the use of the subject technology in technology agreements. Under this scenario, relevant PRC laws try to balance the benefits of having a free flow of technology against the risk that it will distort competition. The authors suggest that, as a result, foreign investors must pay more attention to competition and antitrust concerns in their Chinese technology transfer deals. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_227148508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1593446151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2271485083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDU20TU2M7TgYOAqLs4yMDA0MzMy4GQwDUlNzsjLz8lPr1QIKUrMK05LLVIIzUsBkiUZqQoBQc4KjnklmSVFpcUlCm5Fibmp5flF2TwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HJzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCQ-K7-0KA8oFW9kZG5oYmFqYGFMlCIAsaEzyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227148508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technology Transfer Under the PRC Antitrust Framework</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)</source><creator>Huang, John Z L ; Ma, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, John Z L ; Ma, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>According to the People's Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), 10,538 technology contracts were registered with MOFCOM with an aggregate value of US$22.02 billion in 2006, an increase of 15.6 percent from 2005. Fees received by foreign transferors of technology accounted for 67 percent of the total value i.e., US$14.76 billion). As the value of technology contracts has increased, so has the wariness of the government of the PRC of foreign participation in many key sectors and its perceived potential to create technology monopolies in China held by foreign interests. John Z.L. Huang and Patrick Ma explain that, for example, it is common practice for a foreign transferor to try to place substantial restrictions on the use of the subject technology in technology agreements. Under this scenario, relevant PRC laws try to balance the benefits of having a free flow of technology against the risk that it will distort competition. The authors suggest that, as a result, foreign investors must pay more attention to competition and antitrust concerns in their Chinese technology transfer deals. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-3618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Clifton: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Antitrust ; Compensation ; Foreign investment ; Intellectual property ; Licenses ; Monopolies ; Monopolistic competition ; OEM ; Product development ; Provisions ; R&D ; Raw materials ; Research & development ; Technology transfer</subject><ispartof>Intellectual property & technology law journal, 2008-11, Vol.20 (11), p.19</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Nov 2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/227148508?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,36037,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, John Z L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Technology Transfer Under the PRC Antitrust Framework</title><title>Intellectual property & technology law journal</title><description>According to the People's Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), 10,538 technology contracts were registered with MOFCOM with an aggregate value of US$22.02 billion in 2006, an increase of 15.6 percent from 2005. Fees received by foreign transferors of technology accounted for 67 percent of the total value i.e., US$14.76 billion). As the value of technology contracts has increased, so has the wariness of the government of the PRC of foreign participation in many key sectors and its perceived potential to create technology monopolies in China held by foreign interests. John Z.L. Huang and Patrick Ma explain that, for example, it is common practice for a foreign transferor to try to place substantial restrictions on the use of the subject technology in technology agreements. Under this scenario, relevant PRC laws try to balance the benefits of having a free flow of technology against the risk that it will distort competition. The authors suggest that, as a result, foreign investors must pay more attention to competition and antitrust concerns in their Chinese technology transfer deals. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Monopolistic competition</subject><subject>OEM</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><issn>1534-3618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDU20TU2M7TgYOAqLs4yMDA0MzMy4GQwDUlNzsjLz8lPr1QIKUrMK05LLVIIzUsBkiUZqQoBQc4KjnklmSVFpcUlCm5Fibmp5flF2TwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HJzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCQ-K7-0KA8oFW9kZG5oYmFqYGFMlCIAsaEzyQ</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Huang, John Z L</creator><creator>Ma, Patrick</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Technology Transfer Under the PRC Antitrust Framework</title><author>Huang, John Z L ; Ma, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2271485083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Monopolistic competition</topic><topic>OEM</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, John Z L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Intellectual property & technology law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, John Z L</au><au>Ma, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technology Transfer Under the PRC Antitrust Framework</atitle><jtitle>Intellectual property & technology law journal</jtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>19</spage><pages>19-</pages><issn>1534-3618</issn><abstract>According to the People's Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), 10,538 technology contracts were registered with MOFCOM with an aggregate value of US$22.02 billion in 2006, an increase of 15.6 percent from 2005. Fees received by foreign transferors of technology accounted for 67 percent of the total value i.e., US$14.76 billion). As the value of technology contracts has increased, so has the wariness of the government of the PRC of foreign participation in many key sectors and its perceived potential to create technology monopolies in China held by foreign interests. John Z.L. Huang and Patrick Ma explain that, for example, it is common practice for a foreign transferor to try to place substantial restrictions on the use of the subject technology in technology agreements. Under this scenario, relevant PRC laws try to balance the benefits of having a free flow of technology against the risk that it will distort competition. The authors suggest that, as a result, foreign investors must pay more attention to competition and antitrust concerns in their Chinese technology transfer deals. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Clifton</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-3618 |
ispartof | Intellectual property & technology law journal, 2008-11, Vol.20 (11), p.19 |
issn | 1534-3618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_227148508 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost) |
subjects | Antitrust Compensation Foreign investment Intellectual property Licenses Monopolies Monopolistic competition OEM Product development Provisions R&D Raw materials Research & development Technology transfer |
title | Technology Transfer Under the PRC Antitrust Framework |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A03%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technology%20Transfer%20Under%20the%20PRC%20Antitrust%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Intellectual%20property%20&%20technology%20law%20journal&rft.au=Huang,%20John%20Z%20L&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=19&rft.pages=19-&rft.issn=1534-3618&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1593446151%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2271485083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227148508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |