Loading…
Conservatism in debt contracting: theory and empirical evidence
This paper surveys both the theoretical and the empirical archival literature on conservatism when accounting information is used for debt contracting. The theoretical literature shows mixed results whether conservative accounting is desirable, which depends on the underlying agency problem, the inf...
Saved in:
Published in: | Accounting and business research 2019-09, Vol.49 (6), p.619-647 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1fb83890169ba420d2ef56e7736601486574433bc85f17d9486e76249093fe933 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1fb83890169ba420d2ef56e7736601486574433bc85f17d9486e76249093fe933 |
container_end_page | 647 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 619 |
container_title | Accounting and business research |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Penalva, Fernando Wagenhofer, Alfred |
description | This paper surveys both the theoretical and the empirical archival literature on conservatism when accounting information is used for debt contracting. The theoretical literature shows mixed results whether conservative accounting is desirable, which depends on the underlying agency problem, the information available, and the contracting space. The empirical literature takes a more holistic view in measuring the degree of conservatism. It studies a broad array of possible effects of conservatism in debt financing, but also beyond. The results overwhelmingly support the view that conservatism plays a useful role in debt contracting, although there are also some mixed results. We describe key results and empirical designs, and we provide suggestions for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00014788.2019.1609899 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2271561774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2271561774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1fb83890169ba420d2ef56e7736601486574433bc85f17d9486e76249093fe933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVjwvDUfmy8vKsUvKHjRc8hmE03ZTWqSVvrv3aV69TTM8LwzwwPAJYILBAW8hhCihguxwBDJBWJQCimPwAwjKusGM3gMZhNTT9ApOMt5PbZihGfgdhlDtmmni89D5UPV2bZUJoaStCk-fNxU5dPGtK906Co7bHzyRveV3fnOBmPPwYnTfbYXv3UO3h8f3pbP9er16WV5v6oNkbTUyLWCCAkRk61uMOywdZRZzglj4_OCUd40hLRGUId4J8eJ5Qw3EkrirCRkDq4Oezcpfm1tLmodtymMJxXGHFGGOG9Gih4ok2LOyTq1SX7Qaa8QVJMr9edKTa7Ur6sxd3fI-eBiGvR3TH2nit73Mbmkg_FZkf9X_ADx-m5G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2271561774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservatism in debt contracting: theory and empirical evidence</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Penalva, Fernando ; Wagenhofer, Alfred</creator><creatorcontrib>Penalva, Fernando ; Wagenhofer, Alfred</creatorcontrib><description>This paper surveys both the theoretical and the empirical archival literature on conservatism when accounting information is used for debt contracting. The theoretical literature shows mixed results whether conservative accounting is desirable, which depends on the underlying agency problem, the information available, and the contracting space. The empirical literature takes a more holistic view in measuring the degree of conservatism. It studies a broad array of possible effects of conservatism in debt financing, but also beyond. The results overwhelmingly support the view that conservatism plays a useful role in debt contracting, although there are also some mixed results. We describe key results and empirical designs, and we provide suggestions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-4260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2019.1609899</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>conditional conservatism ; Conservatism ; contract efficiency ; Contracting ; debt contracting ; Debt financing ; Financial reporting</subject><ispartof>Accounting and business research, 2019-09, Vol.49 (6), p.619-647</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1fb83890169ba420d2ef56e7736601486574433bc85f17d9486e76249093fe933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1fb83890169ba420d2ef56e7736601486574433bc85f17d9486e76249093fe933</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5919-942X ; 0000-0002-5206-3754</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penalva, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagenhofer, Alfred</creatorcontrib><title>Conservatism in debt contracting: theory and empirical evidence</title><title>Accounting and business research</title><description>This paper surveys both the theoretical and the empirical archival literature on conservatism when accounting information is used for debt contracting. The theoretical literature shows mixed results whether conservative accounting is desirable, which depends on the underlying agency problem, the information available, and the contracting space. The empirical literature takes a more holistic view in measuring the degree of conservatism. It studies a broad array of possible effects of conservatism in debt financing, but also beyond. The results overwhelmingly support the view that conservatism plays a useful role in debt contracting, although there are also some mixed results. We describe key results and empirical designs, and we provide suggestions for future research.</description><subject>conditional conservatism</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>contract efficiency</subject><subject>Contracting</subject><subject>debt contracting</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><issn>0001-4788</issn><issn>2159-4260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVjwvDUfmy8vKsUvKHjRc8hmE03ZTWqSVvrv3aV69TTM8LwzwwPAJYILBAW8hhCihguxwBDJBWJQCimPwAwjKusGM3gMZhNTT9ApOMt5PbZihGfgdhlDtmmni89D5UPV2bZUJoaStCk-fNxU5dPGtK906Co7bHzyRveV3fnOBmPPwYnTfbYXv3UO3h8f3pbP9er16WV5v6oNkbTUyLWCCAkRk61uMOywdZRZzglj4_OCUd40hLRGUId4J8eJ5Qw3EkrirCRkDq4Oezcpfm1tLmodtymMJxXGHFGGOG9Gih4ok2LOyTq1SX7Qaa8QVJMr9edKTa7Ur6sxd3fI-eBiGvR3TH2nit73Mbmkg_FZkf9X_ADx-m5G</recordid><startdate>20190919</startdate><enddate>20190919</enddate><creator>Penalva, Fernando</creator><creator>Wagenhofer, Alfred</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5919-942X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-3754</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190919</creationdate><title>Conservatism in debt contracting: theory and empirical evidence</title><author>Penalva, Fernando ; Wagenhofer, Alfred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1fb83890169ba420d2ef56e7736601486574433bc85f17d9486e76249093fe933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>conditional conservatism</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>contract efficiency</topic><topic>Contracting</topic><topic>debt contracting</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penalva, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagenhofer, Alfred</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Accounting and business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penalva, Fernando</au><au>Wagenhofer, Alfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservatism in debt contracting: theory and empirical evidence</atitle><jtitle>Accounting and business research</jtitle><date>2019-09-19</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>619-647</pages><issn>0001-4788</issn><eissn>2159-4260</eissn><abstract>This paper surveys both the theoretical and the empirical archival literature on conservatism when accounting information is used for debt contracting. The theoretical literature shows mixed results whether conservative accounting is desirable, which depends on the underlying agency problem, the information available, and the contracting space. The empirical literature takes a more holistic view in measuring the degree of conservatism. It studies a broad array of possible effects of conservatism in debt financing, but also beyond. The results overwhelmingly support the view that conservatism plays a useful role in debt contracting, although there are also some mixed results. We describe key results and empirical designs, and we provide suggestions for future research.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00014788.2019.1609899</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5919-942X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-3754</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4788 |
ispartof | Accounting and business research, 2019-09, Vol.49 (6), p.619-647 |
issn | 0001-4788 2159-4260 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2271561774 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | conditional conservatism Conservatism contract efficiency Contracting debt contracting Debt financing Financial reporting |
title | Conservatism in debt contracting: theory and empirical evidence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A59%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservatism%20in%20debt%20contracting:%20theory%20and%20empirical%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Accounting%20and%20business%20research&rft.au=Penalva,%20Fernando&rft.date=2019-09-19&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=619-647&rft.issn=0001-4788&rft.eissn=2159-4260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00014788.2019.1609899&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2271561774%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1fb83890169ba420d2ef56e7736601486574433bc85f17d9486e76249093fe933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2271561774&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |