Reply to “Comment on ‘Observation of Fourier transform limited lines in hexagonal boron nitride’”

In this Reply, we answer to the comments by Langbein [Phys. Rev. B 100, 047401 (2019)]. We disagree with the argument that our measured spectral shapes and the extracted linewidths are caused by temporal blinking. We give detailed information on our evaluation process to exclude blinking events. Bey...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical review. B 2019-07, Vol.100 (4), p.047402, Article 047402
Main Authors: Dietrich, A., Bürk, M., Steiger, E. S., Antoniuk, L., Tran, T. T., Nguyen, M., Aharonovich, I., Jelezko, F., Kubanek, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Blinking
Boron nitride
Fourier transforms
Silicones
Spectra
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this Reply, we answer to the comments by Langbein [Phys. Rev. B 100, 047401 (2019)]. We disagree with the argument that our measured spectral shapes and the extracted linewidths are caused by temporal blinking. We give detailed information on our evaluation process to exclude blinking events. Beyond the question raised in the Comment, we analyze the influence of spectral diffusion. Although spectral diffusion is an ongoing limitation for defect centers in hexagonal boron nitride, we prove that it is not influencing our extracted linewidths.
ISSN:2469-9950
2469-9969
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.047402