Loading…
Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement
In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advances in cement research 2019-10, Vol.31 (9), p.411-422 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3 |
container_end_page | 422 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 411 |
container_title | Advances in cement research |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Rocha, Sabina Sousa-Coutinho, Joana |
description | In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW
g
) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW
g
5) and 10% (CDW
g
10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW
g
performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW
g
did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW
g
5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1680/jadcr.16.00132 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2274994170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2274994170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLxDAUhYMoWEe3rguuW_Nq2qxEio7CgBtdh8ztDbT0ZZIi_ns7HVf3u_BxDhxC7hnNmaroY2cb8CvmlDLBL0jCyoJlpaLFJUmoPjHT5TW5CaFbFV4qkZCnehpD9AvEdhpTOzZpg8PUt9v7Y0PE1IZ0tj62tk8BBxxj6nHu7ZlvyZWzfcC7_7sjX68vn_VbdvjYv9fPhwy4LmKmpC6ldqh0g1ApkJpzJpyTFl0jnGaFlIAWOEgAoQErVx0llUVTMK6OKHbk4Zw7--l7wRBNNy1-XCsN52u0lqykq5WfLfBTCB6dmX07WP9rGDWnkcw20opmG0n8AbpHW7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2274994170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</title><source>ICE Virtual Library Journals</source><creator>Rocha, Sabina ; Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Sabina ; Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW
g
) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW
g
5) and 10% (CDW
g
10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW
g
performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW
g
did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW
g
5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-7197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1680/jadcr.16.00132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: ICE Publishing</publisher><subject>Alkali-silica reactions ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbonation ; Cement ; Chloride resistance ; Construction materials ; Demolition ; Durability ; Mortars (material) ; Pastes ; Portland cements ; Silicon dioxide ; Sulfate resistance ; Waste disposal</subject><ispartof>Advances in cement research, 2019-10, Vol.31 (9), p.411-422</ispartof><rights>ICE Publishing: All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1933-5540</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creatorcontrib><title>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</title><title>Advances in cement research</title><description>In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW
g
) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW
g
5) and 10% (CDW
g
10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW
g
performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW
g
did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW
g
5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements.</description><subject>Alkali-silica reactions</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbonation</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Chloride resistance</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Durability</subject><subject>Mortars (material)</subject><subject>Pastes</subject><subject>Portland cements</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Sulfate resistance</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><issn>0951-7197</issn><issn>1751-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLxDAUhYMoWEe3rguuW_Nq2qxEio7CgBtdh8ztDbT0ZZIi_ns7HVf3u_BxDhxC7hnNmaroY2cb8CvmlDLBL0jCyoJlpaLFJUmoPjHT5TW5CaFbFV4qkZCnehpD9AvEdhpTOzZpg8PUt9v7Y0PE1IZ0tj62tk8BBxxj6nHu7ZlvyZWzfcC7_7sjX68vn_VbdvjYv9fPhwy4LmKmpC6ldqh0g1ApkJpzJpyTFl0jnGaFlIAWOEgAoQErVx0llUVTMK6OKHbk4Zw7--l7wRBNNy1-XCsN52u0lqykq5WfLfBTCB6dmX07WP9rGDWnkcw20opmG0n8AbpHW7Y</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Rocha, Sabina</creator><creator>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creator><general>ICE Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1933-5540</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</title><author>Rocha, Sabina ; Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alkali-silica reactions</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbonation</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Chloride resistance</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Durability</topic><topic>Mortars (material)</topic><topic>Pastes</topic><topic>Portland cements</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Sulfate resistance</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Advances in cement research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocha, Sabina</au><au>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</atitle><jtitle>Advances in cement research</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>411-422</pages><issn>0951-7197</issn><eissn>1751-7605</eissn><abstract>In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW
g
) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW
g
5) and 10% (CDW
g
10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW
g
performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW
g
did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW
g
5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>ICE Publishing</pub><doi>10.1680/jadcr.16.00132</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1933-5540</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-7197 |
ispartof | Advances in cement research, 2019-10, Vol.31 (9), p.411-422 |
issn | 0951-7197 1751-7605 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2274994170 |
source | ICE Virtual Library Journals |
subjects | Alkali-silica reactions Carbon dioxide Carbonation Cement Chloride resistance Construction materials Demolition Durability Mortars (material) Pastes Portland cements Silicon dioxide Sulfate resistance Waste disposal |
title | Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A44%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20and%20demolition%20waste%20as%20partial%20cement%20replacement&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20cement%20research&rft.au=Rocha,%20Sabina&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=411-422&rft.issn=0951-7197&rft.eissn=1751-7605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1680/jadcr.16.00132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2274994170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2274994170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |