Loading…

Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement

In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in cement research 2019-10, Vol.31 (9), p.411-422
Main Authors: Rocha, Sabina, Sousa-Coutinho, Joana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3
container_end_page 422
container_issue 9
container_start_page 411
container_title Advances in cement research
container_volume 31
creator Rocha, Sabina
Sousa-Coutinho, Joana
description In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW g ) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW g 5) and 10% (CDW g 10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW g performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW g did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW g 5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.1680/jadcr.16.00132
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2274994170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2274994170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLxDAUhYMoWEe3rguuW_Nq2qxEio7CgBtdh8ztDbT0ZZIi_ns7HVf3u_BxDhxC7hnNmaroY2cb8CvmlDLBL0jCyoJlpaLFJUmoPjHT5TW5CaFbFV4qkZCnehpD9AvEdhpTOzZpg8PUt9v7Y0PE1IZ0tj62tk8BBxxj6nHu7ZlvyZWzfcC7_7sjX68vn_VbdvjYv9fPhwy4LmKmpC6ldqh0g1ApkJpzJpyTFl0jnGaFlIAWOEgAoQErVx0llUVTMK6OKHbk4Zw7--l7wRBNNy1-XCsN52u0lqykq5WfLfBTCB6dmX07WP9rGDWnkcw20opmG0n8AbpHW7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2274994170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</title><source>ICE Virtual Library Journals</source><creator>Rocha, Sabina ; Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Sabina ; Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW g ) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW g 5) and 10% (CDW g 10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW g performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW g did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW g 5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-7197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1680/jadcr.16.00132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: ICE Publishing</publisher><subject>Alkali-silica reactions ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbonation ; Cement ; Chloride resistance ; Construction materials ; Demolition ; Durability ; Mortars (material) ; Pastes ; Portland cements ; Silicon dioxide ; Sulfate resistance ; Waste disposal</subject><ispartof>Advances in cement research, 2019-10, Vol.31 (9), p.411-422</ispartof><rights>ICE Publishing: All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1933-5540</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creatorcontrib><title>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</title><title>Advances in cement research</title><description>In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW g ) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW g 5) and 10% (CDW g 10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW g performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW g did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW g 5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements.</description><subject>Alkali-silica reactions</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbonation</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Chloride resistance</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Durability</subject><subject>Mortars (material)</subject><subject>Pastes</subject><subject>Portland cements</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Sulfate resistance</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><issn>0951-7197</issn><issn>1751-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLxDAUhYMoWEe3rguuW_Nq2qxEio7CgBtdh8ztDbT0ZZIi_ns7HVf3u_BxDhxC7hnNmaroY2cb8CvmlDLBL0jCyoJlpaLFJUmoPjHT5TW5CaFbFV4qkZCnehpD9AvEdhpTOzZpg8PUt9v7Y0PE1IZ0tj62tk8BBxxj6nHu7ZlvyZWzfcC7_7sjX68vn_VbdvjYv9fPhwy4LmKmpC6ldqh0g1ApkJpzJpyTFl0jnGaFlIAWOEgAoQErVx0llUVTMK6OKHbk4Zw7--l7wRBNNy1-XCsN52u0lqykq5WfLfBTCB6dmX07WP9rGDWnkcw20opmG0n8AbpHW7Y</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Rocha, Sabina</creator><creator>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creator><general>ICE Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1933-5540</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</title><author>Rocha, Sabina ; Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alkali-silica reactions</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbonation</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Chloride resistance</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Durability</topic><topic>Mortars (material)</topic><topic>Pastes</topic><topic>Portland cements</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Sulfate resistance</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Advances in cement research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocha, Sabina</au><au>Sousa-Coutinho, Joana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement</atitle><jtitle>Advances in cement research</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>411-422</pages><issn>0951-7197</issn><eissn>1751-7605</eissn><abstract>In recent years several studies have been carried out using waste from various industries to partially replace cement in concrete. In addition to improving concrete durability, the use of these waste materials also contributes to reducing emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, and to saving resources. In this study, the applicability of finely ground construction and demolition waste (CDW g ) in concrete as a partial substitute for Portland cement was evaluated and the effects on durability were assessed. Mortars and pastes with cement replacements of 0%, 5% (CDW g 5) and 10% (CDW g 10) were produced. The different mortar types were tested to ascertain their 7, 28 and 90 d strengths and durability-related properties, including capillary absorption, chloride diffusion, accelerated carbonation, resistance to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and sulfate attack. Mortar containing CDW g performed better than the control only with regard to expansion due to ASR. In the other tests, mortar containing CDW g did not attain the performance of the control specimens. However, for the CDW g 5 mortar, performance losses were not significant, indicating that this particular waste at this dosage may be used to partially replace Portland cement. A replacement of 10% could be considered in concretes with lower levels of performance requirements.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>ICE Publishing</pub><doi>10.1680/jadcr.16.00132</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1933-5540</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-7197
ispartof Advances in cement research, 2019-10, Vol.31 (9), p.411-422
issn 0951-7197
1751-7605
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2274994170
source ICE Virtual Library Journals
subjects Alkali-silica reactions
Carbon dioxide
Carbonation
Cement
Chloride resistance
Construction materials
Demolition
Durability
Mortars (material)
Pastes
Portland cements
Silicon dioxide
Sulfate resistance
Waste disposal
title Construction and demolition waste as partial cement replacement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A44%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20and%20demolition%20waste%20as%20partial%20cement%20replacement&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20cement%20research&rft.au=Rocha,%20Sabina&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=411-422&rft.issn=0951-7197&rft.eissn=1751-7605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1680/jadcr.16.00132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2274994170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-649749fe69dec86c492213ff4aefd3f91544ceac2c4cc39ce8f8b4045d5126be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2274994170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true