A brief history of cliometrics and the evolving view of the industrial revolution

Over the past century and a half, economists have differed on methodology, interpretation, and explanation of the causes, consequences, and proper approach to understanding the historical period commonly referred to as the Industrial Revolution. The impact of the methodological debate over the role...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The European journal of the history of economic thought 2019-07, Vol.26 (4), p.738-774
Main Author: Haupert, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cliometrics
economic growth
economic history
Economists
History of ideas
Industrial Revolution
total factor productivity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Over the past century and a half, economists have differed on methodology, interpretation, and explanation of the causes, consequences, and proper approach to understanding the historical period commonly referred to as the Industrial Revolution. The impact of the methodological debate over the role of theory and history in economics, and the growth of cliometrics on the ways in which we think about and analyze the Industrial Revolution have been primary factors in this debate. This article uses the rise of cliometrics as a lens through which to view the intellectual history of economists' views of the Industrial Revolution. It is not in itself an attempt to explain the causes or consequences of the Industrial Revolution, but rather, an overview of the evolution of the approaches that economists have used to define what constituted the Industrial Revolution, when it occurred, and how to explain its causes and why it occurred when and where it did.
ISSN:0967-2567
1469-5936
DOI:10.1080/09672567.2019.1630462