Loading…
Smallholder willingness to pay and preferences in the way irrigation water should be managed : a choice experiment application in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Efficient and sustainable utilization of irrigation water is the key to realizing the objective of enhancing agricultural productivity and commercializing smallholder irrigation farming. Valuing and recognizing the scarcity of irrigation water is essential for its sustainable use. Using cross-sectio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water S. A. 2019-07, Vol.45 (3), p.383-392 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-18c3b812237d2f2c258c06be841f763224208d8e618ba1a94acd409038b28f293 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 392 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | Water S. A. |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Chipfupa, U. Wale, E. |
description | Efficient and sustainable utilization of irrigation water is the key to realizing the objective of enhancing agricultural productivity and commercializing smallholder irrigation farming. Valuing and recognizing the scarcity of irrigation water is essential for its sustainable use. Using cross-sectional data from 328 smallholders in and around Makhathini and Ndumo-B irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal Province, the study aimed to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for the way irrigation water resources should be managed and their willingness to pay for irrigation water. This was done employing a choice experiment method. The results suggest the need for irrigation water pricing to reflect irrigation intensity. They also show that improving agricultural production and productivity, with market access can enhance farmers’ willingness and ability to pay for irrigation water. The need to consider multiple uses of irrigation water for sustainable utilization of water resources is evident, while supporting women smallholders will have a positive impact on their willingness to pay for irrigation water. The paper recommends a shift towards on-farm volumetric water pricing in the irrigation schemes. The schemes should also have clearly defined boundaries and enforceable rules on collective use of water. The design of irrigation infrastructure should integrate other uses of irrigation water such as domestic and livestock purposes. Consequently, there is a need for further research to ensure that irrigation water prices reflect the marginal value of irrigation water use. Policies should address factors that inherently result in gender differences in terms of access to productive resources which negatively affect sustainable water utilization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i3.6735 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2279753474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A625795777</galeid><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-175c733e72</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A625795777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-18c3b812237d2f2c258c06be841f763224208d8e618ba1a94acd409038b28f293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMuO1DAQRSMEEs3AJyBZYksyfsSxwwa1WsNzBIuBDZuo4lQ6HrntYDvT8DH8K0aNalGquvfckqqqXjLaMMVkf31OcM0p65uHVjZWNJ0S8lG1Y5p1teolfVztqFC6bpXQT6tnKd1TyoVo-1315-4Ezi3BTRjJ2Tpn_dFjSiQHssJvAn4ia8QZI3qDiVhP8oLkXCQboz1CtsGXMRc8LWFzExmRnMDDESfyhgAxS7AGCf5aMdoT-kxgXZ01F7LkfT7Dj81t9RfI4F6Tu7DlheznWCzPqyczuIQv_ver6vu7m2-HD_Xt1_cfD_vb2kjR55ppI0bNOBdq4jM3XGpDuxF1y2bVCc5bTvWksWN6BAZ9C2ZqaU-FHrmeeS-uqleX3DWGnxumPNyHLfpycuBc9UqKVrXF1VxcR3A4WD-HHMGUmvBkTfA427Lfd1yWpyulCvD2AiQYrcc8JMB1G4cl5zUNy-SGpfy3MP80RiWnw82nw8CUNEoIVFz8BWG2lDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2279753474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smallholder willingness to pay and preferences in the way irrigation water should be managed : a choice experiment application in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Chipfupa, U. ; Wale, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chipfupa, U. ; Wale, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Efficient and sustainable utilization of irrigation water is the key to realizing the objective of enhancing agricultural productivity and commercializing smallholder irrigation farming. Valuing and recognizing the scarcity of irrigation water is essential for its sustainable use. Using cross-sectional data from 328 smallholders in and around Makhathini and Ndumo-B irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal Province, the study aimed to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for the way irrigation water resources should be managed and their willingness to pay for irrigation water. This was done employing a choice experiment method. The results suggest the need for irrigation water pricing to reflect irrigation intensity. They also show that improving agricultural production and productivity, with market access can enhance farmers’ willingness and ability to pay for irrigation water. The need to consider multiple uses of irrigation water for sustainable utilization of water resources is evident, while supporting women smallholders will have a positive impact on their willingness to pay for irrigation water. The paper recommends a shift towards on-farm volumetric water pricing in the irrigation schemes. The schemes should also have clearly defined boundaries and enforceable rules on collective use of water. The design of irrigation infrastructure should integrate other uses of irrigation water such as domestic and livestock purposes. Consequently, there is a need for further research to ensure that irrigation water prices reflect the marginal value of irrigation water use. Policies should address factors that inherently result in gender differences in terms of access to productive resources which negatively affect sustainable water utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1816-7950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i3.6735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gezina: Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><subject>Access ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Case studies ; Efficiency ; Experiments ; Farmers ; Farmers’ preference on irrigation water management ; Farmers’ willingness to pay for irrigation water ; Food security ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Infrastructure ; Infrastructure (Economics) ; Iran ; Irrigated farming ; Irrigation ; Irrigation design ; Irrigation water ; Livestock ; Market prices ; Methods ; Multiple uses of irrigation water ; Preferences ; Pricing ; Productivity ; Rural areas ; Sex differences ; Small farms ; South Africa ; Sub-Saharan Africa ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable use ; Utilization ; Valuation ; Water ; Water consumption ; Water markets ; Water measurement ; Water pricing ; Water resource management ; Water resources ; Water scarcity ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water use ; Water valuation ; Willingness to pay ; Women</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2019-07, Vol.45 (3), p.383-392</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Water Research Commission</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-18c3b812237d2f2c258c06be841f763224208d8e618ba1a94acd409038b28f293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2279753474/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2279753474?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25744,27915,27916,37003,44581,74887</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chipfupa, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wale, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Smallholder willingness to pay and preferences in the way irrigation water should be managed : a choice experiment application in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>Efficient and sustainable utilization of irrigation water is the key to realizing the objective of enhancing agricultural productivity and commercializing smallholder irrigation farming. Valuing and recognizing the scarcity of irrigation water is essential for its sustainable use. Using cross-sectional data from 328 smallholders in and around Makhathini and Ndumo-B irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal Province, the study aimed to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for the way irrigation water resources should be managed and their willingness to pay for irrigation water. This was done employing a choice experiment method. The results suggest the need for irrigation water pricing to reflect irrigation intensity. They also show that improving agricultural production and productivity, with market access can enhance farmers’ willingness and ability to pay for irrigation water. The need to consider multiple uses of irrigation water for sustainable utilization of water resources is evident, while supporting women smallholders will have a positive impact on their willingness to pay for irrigation water. The paper recommends a shift towards on-farm volumetric water pricing in the irrigation schemes. The schemes should also have clearly defined boundaries and enforceable rules on collective use of water. The design of irrigation infrastructure should integrate other uses of irrigation water such as domestic and livestock purposes. Consequently, there is a need for further research to ensure that irrigation water prices reflect the marginal value of irrigation water use. Policies should address factors that inherently result in gender differences in terms of access to productive resources which negatively affect sustainable water utilization.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farmers’ preference on irrigation water management</subject><subject>Farmers’ willingness to pay for irrigation water</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Infrastructure (Economics)</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Irrigated farming</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation design</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple uses of irrigation water</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Small farms</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Sub-Saharan Africa</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable use</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water markets</subject><subject>Water measurement</subject><subject>Water pricing</subject><subject>Water resource management</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water valuation</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMuO1DAQRSMEEs3AJyBZYksyfsSxwwa1WsNzBIuBDZuo4lQ6HrntYDvT8DH8K0aNalGquvfckqqqXjLaMMVkf31OcM0p65uHVjZWNJ0S8lG1Y5p1teolfVztqFC6bpXQT6tnKd1TyoVo-1315-4Ezi3BTRjJ2Tpn_dFjSiQHssJvAn4ia8QZI3qDiVhP8oLkXCQboz1CtsGXMRc8LWFzExmRnMDDESfyhgAxS7AGCf5aMdoT-kxgXZ01F7LkfT7Dj81t9RfI4F6Tu7DlheznWCzPqyczuIQv_ver6vu7m2-HD_Xt1_cfD_vb2kjR55ppI0bNOBdq4jM3XGpDuxF1y2bVCc5bTvWksWN6BAZ9C2ZqaU-FHrmeeS-uqleX3DWGnxumPNyHLfpycuBc9UqKVrXF1VxcR3A4WD-HHMGUmvBkTfA427Lfd1yWpyulCvD2AiQYrcc8JMB1G4cl5zUNy-SGpfy3MP80RiWnw82nw8CUNEoIVFz8BWG2lDA</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Chipfupa, U.</creator><creator>Wale, E.</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><general>Water Research Commission</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Smallholder willingness to pay and preferences in the way irrigation water should be managed : a choice experiment application in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa</title><author>Chipfupa, U. ; Wale, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-18c3b812237d2f2c258c06be841f763224208d8e618ba1a94acd409038b28f293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farmers’ preference on irrigation water management</topic><topic>Farmers’ willingness to pay for irrigation water</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Infrastructure (Economics)</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Irrigated farming</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation design</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple uses of irrigation water</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Small farms</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Sub-Saharan Africa</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable use</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water markets</topic><topic>Water measurement</topic><topic>Water pricing</topic><topic>Water resource management</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water valuation</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chipfupa, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wale, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chipfupa, U.</au><au>Wale, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smallholder willingness to pay and preferences in the way irrigation water should be managed : a choice experiment application in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>383-392</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><eissn>1816-7950</eissn><abstract>Efficient and sustainable utilization of irrigation water is the key to realizing the objective of enhancing agricultural productivity and commercializing smallholder irrigation farming. Valuing and recognizing the scarcity of irrigation water is essential for its sustainable use. Using cross-sectional data from 328 smallholders in and around Makhathini and Ndumo-B irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal Province, the study aimed to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for the way irrigation water resources should be managed and their willingness to pay for irrigation water. This was done employing a choice experiment method. The results suggest the need for irrigation water pricing to reflect irrigation intensity. They also show that improving agricultural production and productivity, with market access can enhance farmers’ willingness and ability to pay for irrigation water. The need to consider multiple uses of irrigation water for sustainable utilization of water resources is evident, while supporting women smallholders will have a positive impact on their willingness to pay for irrigation water. The paper recommends a shift towards on-farm volumetric water pricing in the irrigation schemes. The schemes should also have clearly defined boundaries and enforceable rules on collective use of water. The design of irrigation infrastructure should integrate other uses of irrigation water such as domestic and livestock purposes. Consequently, there is a need for further research to ensure that irrigation water prices reflect the marginal value of irrigation water use. Policies should address factors that inherently result in gender differences in terms of access to productive resources which negatively affect sustainable water utilization.</abstract><cop>Gezina</cop><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><doi>10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i3.6735</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-4738 |
ispartof | Water S. A., 2019-07, Vol.45 (3), p.383-392 |
issn | 0378-4738 1816-7950 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2279753474 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Access Agricultural management Agricultural production Agriculture Case studies Efficiency Experiments Farmers Farmers’ preference on irrigation water management Farmers’ willingness to pay for irrigation water Food security Gender Gender aspects Infrastructure Infrastructure (Economics) Iran Irrigated farming Irrigation Irrigation design Irrigation water Livestock Market prices Methods Multiple uses of irrigation water Preferences Pricing Productivity Rural areas Sex differences Small farms South Africa Sub-Saharan Africa Sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable use Utilization Valuation Water Water consumption Water markets Water measurement Water pricing Water resource management Water resources Water scarcity Water shortages Water supply Water use Water valuation Willingness to pay Women |
title | Smallholder willingness to pay and preferences in the way irrigation water should be managed : a choice experiment application in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smallholder%20willingness%20to%20pay%20and%20preferences%20in%20the%20way%20irrigation%20water%20should%20be%20managed%20:%20a%20choice%20experiment%20application%20in%20KwaZulu-Natal,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Chipfupa,%20U.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=383-392&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=1816-7950&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i3.6735&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA625795777%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-18c3b812237d2f2c258c06be841f763224208d8e618ba1a94acd409038b28f293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2279753474&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A625795777&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-175c733e72&rfr_iscdi=true |