Loading…
How Costly is Turnover? Evidence from Retail
Working Paper No. 26179 Identifying the causal effects of turnover on organizational productivity is challenging, due to data constraints and endogeneity issues. We address these challenges by using day-to-day variation in the composition and performance of small retail sales teams, and by exploitin...
Saved in:
Published in: | NBER Working Paper Series 2019-08, p.26179 |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 26179 |
container_title | NBER Working Paper Series |
container_volume | |
description | Working Paper No. 26179 Identifying the causal effects of turnover on organizational productivity is challenging, due to data constraints and endogeneity issues. We address these challenges by using day-to-day variation in the composition and performance of small retail sales teams, and by exploiting an advance notice requirement for quits. We find robust and statistically significant productivity losses at four distinct times during the departure process: after the worker gives notice, before she departs, after she leaves, and after a new worker starts. We attribute the first two effects to a combination of recruitment activities by incumbent workers and reductions in morale, and the last two to short-staffing and on-boarding costs. Almost two thirds (63 percent) of these productivity losses occur before the departing worker leaves, and only 24 percent result from operating with an unfilled vacancy. Overall, we estimate that the costs of a ten percent increase in turnover are equivalent to a 0.6 percent wage increase; wage hikes will therefore pay for themselves (in turnover cost savings) only if the elasticity of quits to wages exceeds 16.8 in absolute value. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3386/w26179 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2279835982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2279835982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e722-d9f3b2be3255554b99549c26defbc2b87c2e685bb6f725393f68fe11691675473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjlFLwzAURvOg4JzzNwR8tZrcNMm9TyJlbsJAGH0fS3sDHXXRptvw31vQ7-W8nfMJca_VkzHoni_gtKcrMVNIWAAZfyNucz4oBYhKz8TjOl1klfLY_8guy_o0HNOZhxe5PHctHxuWcUifcsvjvuvvxHXc95kX_5yL-m1ZV-ti87F6r143BXuAoqVoAgQ2YKeVgciW1IBrOYYGAvoG2KENwUUP1pCJDiNr7Ug7b0tv5uLhT_s1pO8T53F3SNOvqbgD8ITGEoL5BRw_Pro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2279835982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Costly is Turnover? Evidence from Retail</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><description>Working Paper No. 26179 Identifying the causal effects of turnover on organizational productivity is challenging, due to data constraints and endogeneity issues. We address these challenges by using day-to-day variation in the composition and performance of small retail sales teams, and by exploiting an advance notice requirement for quits. We find robust and statistically significant productivity losses at four distinct times during the departure process: after the worker gives notice, before she departs, after she leaves, and after a new worker starts. We attribute the first two effects to a combination of recruitment activities by incumbent workers and reductions in morale, and the last two to short-staffing and on-boarding costs. Almost two thirds (63 percent) of these productivity losses occur before the departing worker leaves, and only 24 percent result from operating with an unfilled vacancy. Overall, we estimate that the costs of a ten percent increase in turnover are equivalent to a 0.6 percent wage increase; wage hikes will therefore pay for themselves (in turnover cost savings) only if the elasticity of quits to wages exceeds 16.8 in absolute value.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w26179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Causality ; Cost control ; Economic theory ; Employees ; Employers ; Employment ; Productivity ; Retailing industry ; Teams ; Workers ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2019-08, p.26179</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Aug 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2279835982?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>777,781,11669,27906,36041,44344</link.rule.ids></links><search><title>How Costly is Turnover? Evidence from Retail</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Working Paper No. 26179 Identifying the causal effects of turnover on organizational productivity is challenging, due to data constraints and endogeneity issues. We address these challenges by using day-to-day variation in the composition and performance of small retail sales teams, and by exploiting an advance notice requirement for quits. We find robust and statistically significant productivity losses at four distinct times during the departure process: after the worker gives notice, before she departs, after she leaves, and after a new worker starts. We attribute the first two effects to a combination of recruitment activities by incumbent workers and reductions in morale, and the last two to short-staffing and on-boarding costs. Almost two thirds (63 percent) of these productivity losses occur before the departing worker leaves, and only 24 percent result from operating with an unfilled vacancy. Overall, we estimate that the costs of a ten percent increase in turnover are equivalent to a 0.6 percent wage increase; wage hikes will therefore pay for themselves (in turnover cost savings) only if the elasticity of quits to wages exceeds 16.8 in absolute value.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Retailing industry</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjlFLwzAURvOg4JzzNwR8tZrcNMm9TyJlbsJAGH0fS3sDHXXRptvw31vQ7-W8nfMJca_VkzHoni_gtKcrMVNIWAAZfyNucz4oBYhKz8TjOl1klfLY_8guy_o0HNOZhxe5PHctHxuWcUifcsvjvuvvxHXc95kX_5yL-m1ZV-ti87F6r143BXuAoqVoAgQ2YKeVgciW1IBrOYYGAvoG2KENwUUP1pCJDiNr7Ug7b0tv5uLhT_s1pO8T53F3SNOvqbgD8ITGEoL5BRw_Pro</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>How Costly is Turnover? Evidence from Retail</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e722-d9f3b2be3255554b99549c26defbc2b87c2e685bb6f725393f68fe11691675473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Retailing industry</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>How Costly is Turnover? Evidence from Retail</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><spage>26179</spage><pages>26179-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Working Paper No. 26179 Identifying the causal effects of turnover on organizational productivity is challenging, due to data constraints and endogeneity issues. We address these challenges by using day-to-day variation in the composition and performance of small retail sales teams, and by exploiting an advance notice requirement for quits. We find robust and statistically significant productivity losses at four distinct times during the departure process: after the worker gives notice, before she departs, after she leaves, and after a new worker starts. We attribute the first two effects to a combination of recruitment activities by incumbent workers and reductions in morale, and the last two to short-staffing and on-boarding costs. Almost two thirds (63 percent) of these productivity losses occur before the departing worker leaves, and only 24 percent result from operating with an unfilled vacancy. Overall, we estimate that the costs of a ten percent increase in turnover are equivalent to a 0.6 percent wage increase; wage hikes will therefore pay for themselves (in turnover cost savings) only if the elasticity of quits to wages exceeds 16.8 in absolute value.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</pub><doi>10.3386/w26179</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2937 |
ispartof | NBER Working Paper Series, 2019-08, p.26179 |
issn | 0898-2937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2279835982 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Behavior Causality Cost control Economic theory Employees Employers Employment Productivity Retailing industry Teams Workers Workforce planning |
title | How Costly is Turnover? Evidence from Retail |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A51%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=How%20Costly%20is%20Turnover?%20Evidence%20from%20Retail&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.spage=26179&rft.pages=26179-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w26179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2279835982%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e722-d9f3b2be3255554b99549c26defbc2b87c2e685bb6f725393f68fe11691675473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2279835982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |