Loading…
Noncontact Measurement of Bridge Load Response Using He–Ne Modulated Lasers
AbstractStructural deformation under known loads is required for assessment and model calibration. In addition, deformations need to be measured under transient as well as intrinsic loads. These loads have significantly different application durations requiring significantly different sampling rates...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of bridge engineering 2019-11, Vol.24 (11) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-2009b940252ce166595f0940232d0639a9f32526930b498b2b5117c5a13a88923 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-2009b940252ce166595f0940232d0639a9f32526930b498b2b5117c5a13a88923 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of bridge engineering |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Attanayake, Upul Aktan, Haluk |
description | AbstractStructural deformation under known loads is required for assessment and model calibration. In addition, deformations need to be measured under transient as well as intrinsic loads. These loads have significantly different application durations requiring significantly different sampling rates. Measurement of deformations and translations with traditional sensors is challenging because it requires sensor mounting to a fixed reference. In the case of monitoring structures during construction, limited access and schedule constraints necessitate placement of the monitoring equipment outside the active construction zone. This article presents an implementation as well as proof of concept of a noncontact technology for obtaining accurate measurements with minimum impact to the structure and construction activities. Indoor and outdoor calibration showed that the deviation of measurements made at an 81-m (266-ft) range was about ±7% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The maximum deviation of deflection measurements made during load testing of a steel girder bridge was 8.3% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The measurements included three-dimensional (3D) displacements at each location, a significant advancement over traditional technologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001468 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2281666631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2281666631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-2009b940252ce166595f0940232d0639a9f32526930b498b2b5117c5a13a88923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwBws2sEgZ27Ebs6NVoEhpkYCuLSdxqlZtXOxkwY47cENOgkMLrFjNjOf_P9ZD6JzAgIAg15e3z-P0apQOiIxZxLmkAwAgsUgOUO_37TD0kMQRDIEeoxPvV98ayXpoOrN1YetGFw2eGu1bZzambrCt8Mgty4XBmdUlfjJ-a2tv8Nwv6wWemM_3j5nBU1u2a92YEmfaG-dP0VGl196c7Wsfze_Sl_Ekyh7vH8a3WaSZ4E1EAWQuY6CcFoYIwSWvoJsZLUEwqWXFwi58EPJYJjnNOSHDgmvCdJJIyvroYpe7dfa1Nb5RK9u6OpxUlCYhUQhGgupmpyqc9d6ZSm3dcqPdmyKgOnxKdfjUKFUdKtWhUnt8wSx2Zu0L8xf_4_zf-AW69HHe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281666631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noncontact Measurement of Bridge Load Response Using He–Ne Modulated Lasers</title><source>ASCE Journals</source><creator>Attanayake, Upul ; Aktan, Haluk</creator><creatorcontrib>Attanayake, Upul ; Aktan, Haluk</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractStructural deformation under known loads is required for assessment and model calibration. In addition, deformations need to be measured under transient as well as intrinsic loads. These loads have significantly different application durations requiring significantly different sampling rates. Measurement of deformations and translations with traditional sensors is challenging because it requires sensor mounting to a fixed reference. In the case of monitoring structures during construction, limited access and schedule constraints necessitate placement of the monitoring equipment outside the active construction zone. This article presents an implementation as well as proof of concept of a noncontact technology for obtaining accurate measurements with minimum impact to the structure and construction activities. Indoor and outdoor calibration showed that the deviation of measurements made at an 81-m (266-ft) range was about ±7% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The maximum deviation of deflection measurements made during load testing of a steel girder bridge was 8.3% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The measurements included three-dimensional (3D) displacements at each location, a significant advancement over traditional technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-0702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Bridge construction ; Bridge loads ; Calibration ; Civil engineering ; Construction ; Deformation ; Deviation ; Displacement ; Girder bridges ; Lasers ; Load ; Loads (forces) ; Measurement ; Monitoring ; Potentiometers ; Schedules ; Sensors ; Steel ; Steel bridges ; Steel structures ; Structural steels ; Technical Papers ; Translations</subject><ispartof>Journal of bridge engineering, 2019-11, Vol.24 (11)</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.</rights><rights>2019 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-2009b940252ce166595f0940232d0639a9f32526930b498b2b5117c5a13a88923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-2009b940252ce166595f0940232d0639a9f32526930b498b2b5117c5a13a88923</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5260-0145</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001468$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001468$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Attanayake, Upul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktan, Haluk</creatorcontrib><title>Noncontact Measurement of Bridge Load Response Using He–Ne Modulated Lasers</title><title>Journal of bridge engineering</title><description>AbstractStructural deformation under known loads is required for assessment and model calibration. In addition, deformations need to be measured under transient as well as intrinsic loads. These loads have significantly different application durations requiring significantly different sampling rates. Measurement of deformations and translations with traditional sensors is challenging because it requires sensor mounting to a fixed reference. In the case of monitoring structures during construction, limited access and schedule constraints necessitate placement of the monitoring equipment outside the active construction zone. This article presents an implementation as well as proof of concept of a noncontact technology for obtaining accurate measurements with minimum impact to the structure and construction activities. Indoor and outdoor calibration showed that the deviation of measurements made at an 81-m (266-ft) range was about ±7% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The maximum deviation of deflection measurements made during load testing of a steel girder bridge was 8.3% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The measurements included three-dimensional (3D) displacements at each location, a significant advancement over traditional technologies.</description><subject>Bridge construction</subject><subject>Bridge loads</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Girder bridges</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Potentiometers</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steel bridges</subject><subject>Steel structures</subject><subject>Structural steels</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Translations</subject><issn>1084-0702</issn><issn>1943-5592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwBws2sEgZ27Ebs6NVoEhpkYCuLSdxqlZtXOxkwY47cENOgkMLrFjNjOf_P9ZD6JzAgIAg15e3z-P0apQOiIxZxLmkAwAgsUgOUO_37TD0kMQRDIEeoxPvV98ayXpoOrN1YetGFw2eGu1bZzambrCt8Mgty4XBmdUlfjJ-a2tv8Nwv6wWemM_3j5nBU1u2a92YEmfaG-dP0VGl196c7Wsfze_Sl_Ekyh7vH8a3WaSZ4E1EAWQuY6CcFoYIwSWvoJsZLUEwqWXFwi58EPJYJjnNOSHDgmvCdJJIyvroYpe7dfa1Nb5RK9u6OpxUlCYhUQhGgupmpyqc9d6ZSm3dcqPdmyKgOnxKdfjUKFUdKtWhUnt8wSx2Zu0L8xf_4_zf-AW69HHe</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Attanayake, Upul</creator><creator>Aktan, Haluk</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-0145</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Noncontact Measurement of Bridge Load Response Using He–Ne Modulated Lasers</title><author>Attanayake, Upul ; Aktan, Haluk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-2009b940252ce166595f0940232d0639a9f32526930b498b2b5117c5a13a88923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bridge construction</topic><topic>Bridge loads</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Girder bridges</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Potentiometers</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steel bridges</topic><topic>Steel structures</topic><topic>Structural steels</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Translations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Attanayake, Upul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aktan, Haluk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of bridge engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Attanayake, Upul</au><au>Aktan, Haluk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noncontact Measurement of Bridge Load Response Using He–Ne Modulated Lasers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bridge engineering</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><issn>1084-0702</issn><eissn>1943-5592</eissn><abstract>AbstractStructural deformation under known loads is required for assessment and model calibration. In addition, deformations need to be measured under transient as well as intrinsic loads. These loads have significantly different application durations requiring significantly different sampling rates. Measurement of deformations and translations with traditional sensors is challenging because it requires sensor mounting to a fixed reference. In the case of monitoring structures during construction, limited access and schedule constraints necessitate placement of the monitoring equipment outside the active construction zone. This article presents an implementation as well as proof of concept of a noncontact technology for obtaining accurate measurements with minimum impact to the structure and construction activities. Indoor and outdoor calibration showed that the deviation of measurements made at an 81-m (266-ft) range was about ±7% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The maximum deviation of deflection measurements made during load testing of a steel girder bridge was 8.3% of the linear displacement potentiometer sensors. The measurements included three-dimensional (3D) displacements at each location, a significant advancement over traditional technologies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001468</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-0145</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1084-0702 |
ispartof | Journal of bridge engineering, 2019-11, Vol.24 (11) |
issn | 1084-0702 1943-5592 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2281666631 |
source | ASCE Journals |
subjects | Bridge construction Bridge loads Calibration Civil engineering Construction Deformation Deviation Displacement Girder bridges Lasers Load Loads (forces) Measurement Monitoring Potentiometers Schedules Sensors Steel Steel bridges Steel structures Structural steels Technical Papers Translations |
title | Noncontact Measurement of Bridge Load Response Using He–Ne Modulated Lasers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A07%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noncontact%20Measurement%20of%20Bridge%20Load%20Response%20Using%20He%E2%80%93Ne%20Modulated%20Lasers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bridge%20engineering&rft.au=Attanayake,%20Upul&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.issn=1084-0702&rft.eissn=1943-5592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001468&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2281666631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-2009b940252ce166595f0940232d0639a9f32526930b498b2b5117c5a13a88923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281666631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |