Loading…

Pairing nest boxes does not promote coexistence of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and subordinate cavity nesters

Because nest site competition among cavity-nesting birds is often intense, the practice of pairing nest boxes has been promoted as a way to reduce nest-site competition and allow for the relatively peaceful coexistence of a dominant and a subordinate species within an area. Although apparently effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Wilson journal of ornithology 2019-06, Vol.131 (2), p.422-427
Main Authors: Stanback, Mark T., Niemasik, Esther, Millican, David, McGovern, Patrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b299t-e078356f68911ca11b4d1b6b80163b85ee9a33ac33d93fceef7b892edee5a5fe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b299t-e078356f68911ca11b4d1b6b80163b85ee9a33ac33d93fceef7b892edee5a5fe3
container_end_page 427
container_issue 2
container_start_page 422
container_title The Wilson journal of ornithology
container_volume 131
creator Stanback, Mark T.
Niemasik, Esther
Millican, David
McGovern, Patrick
description Because nest site competition among cavity-nesting birds is often intense, the practice of pairing nest boxes has been promoted as a way to reduce nest-site competition and allow for the relatively peaceful coexistence of a dominant and a subordinate species within an area. Although apparently effective for promoting the coexistence of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis), it is unknown whether this practice might be effective for other competing species pairs. We conducted an experiment to test whether providing paired identical boxes would promote the adjacent breeding of Eastern Bluebirds and 2 smaller/subordinate cavity nesters: the Carolina Chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) and the Brown-headed Nuthatch (Sitta pusilla). Our box pairs were of 2 types. Our Big/Small pairs consisted of one box with a bluebird-sized (38 mm) entrance hole and another with a 26 mm hole (too small for a bluebird but appropriate for a nuthatch or chickadee). Our other pairs (Big/Big) consisted of 2 boxes with identical 38 mm holes. Boxes within pairs were 10 m apart. If bluebirds are intolerant of subordinate cavity nesters breeding nearby, we would expect to find similar (and low) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. If, however, bluebirds simply defend their own nest cavity, we would expect to find similar (and high) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. Finally, if bluebirds guard all usable nest boxes in a small area, we would expect to find high occupation of Big/Small box pairs by nuthatches and chickadees and low occupation by these species of Big/ Big box pairs. We found that bluebirds excluded both nuthatches and chickadees from adjacent big-hole boxes but not from adjacent small-hole boxes, indicating that pairing identical boxes does not promote coexistence of bluebirds and these smaller species. Smaller, less competitive species require nest boxes that exclude larger and more competitive species.
doi_str_mv 10.1676/18-93
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2282413781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27129261</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27129261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b299t-e078356f68911ca11b4d1b6b80163b85ee9a33ac33d93fceef7b892edee5a5fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGs_ghAQQQ-rO8lmNzlqqX-goKCel2R3VlLaRJNdab-9qRU9eZn3GH68xwwhE8gvoazKK5CZ4ntkBIrLTBRFtZ-8ECorCgWH5CjGRZ6nNRcjEp-0Dda9UYexp8avMdLWp-F8T9-DX_keaeNxbWOPrkHqOzrTyQdHb5YDGhvaSM-frV5aTeNW4gXVrqVxMD601ultgP60_ea7A0M8JgedXkac_OiYvN7OXqb32fzx7mF6Pc8MU6rPMK8kF2VXSgXQaABTtGBKI3MouZECUWnOdcN5q3jXIHaVkYphiyi06JCPyekuN93xMaTueuGH4FJlzZhkBfBKQqLOdlQTfIwBu_o92JUOmxryevvPGmSteOJOdtwi9j78QqwCplgJf23Geu_wn5Qv_3p99Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2282413781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pairing nest boxes does not promote coexistence of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and subordinate cavity nesters</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Stanback, Mark T. ; Niemasik, Esther ; Millican, David ; McGovern, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanback, Mark T. ; Niemasik, Esther ; Millican, David ; McGovern, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>Because nest site competition among cavity-nesting birds is often intense, the practice of pairing nest boxes has been promoted as a way to reduce nest-site competition and allow for the relatively peaceful coexistence of a dominant and a subordinate species within an area. Although apparently effective for promoting the coexistence of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis), it is unknown whether this practice might be effective for other competing species pairs. We conducted an experiment to test whether providing paired identical boxes would promote the adjacent breeding of Eastern Bluebirds and 2 smaller/subordinate cavity nesters: the Carolina Chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) and the Brown-headed Nuthatch (Sitta pusilla). Our box pairs were of 2 types. Our Big/Small pairs consisted of one box with a bluebird-sized (38 mm) entrance hole and another with a 26 mm hole (too small for a bluebird but appropriate for a nuthatch or chickadee). Our other pairs (Big/Big) consisted of 2 boxes with identical 38 mm holes. Boxes within pairs were 10 m apart. If bluebirds are intolerant of subordinate cavity nesters breeding nearby, we would expect to find similar (and low) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. If, however, bluebirds simply defend their own nest cavity, we would expect to find similar (and high) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. Finally, if bluebirds guard all usable nest boxes in a small area, we would expect to find high occupation of Big/Small box pairs by nuthatches and chickadees and low occupation by these species of Big/ Big box pairs. We found that bluebirds excluded both nuthatches and chickadees from adjacent big-hole boxes but not from adjacent small-hole boxes, indicating that pairing identical boxes does not promote coexistence of bluebirds and these smaller species. Smaller, less competitive species require nest boxes that exclude larger and more competitive species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-4491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1676/18-93</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Collins: Wilson Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Biological competition ; Birds ; Boxes ; Breeding ; Brown-headed Nuthatch ; cajas-nido pareadas ; Carolina Chickadee ; Cavity nesters ; Cavity nesting ; Coexistence ; competencia por sitios de anidación ; Competition ; Eastern Bluebird ; Nest boxes ; nest-site competition ; Nesting ; Occupancy ; Occupations ; Ornithology ; paired nest boxes ; Poecile carolinensis ; Population ; SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ; Sialia sialis ; Sitta pusilla ; Species ; Success ; Tachycineta bicolor</subject><ispartof>The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2019-06, Vol.131 (2), p.422-427</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wilson Ornithological Society Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b299t-e078356f68911ca11b4d1b6b80163b85ee9a33ac33d93fceef7b892edee5a5fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b299t-e078356f68911ca11b4d1b6b80163b85ee9a33ac33d93fceef7b892edee5a5fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27129261$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27129261$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58217,58450</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanback, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemasik, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millican, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Pairing nest boxes does not promote coexistence of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and subordinate cavity nesters</title><title>The Wilson journal of ornithology</title><description>Because nest site competition among cavity-nesting birds is often intense, the practice of pairing nest boxes has been promoted as a way to reduce nest-site competition and allow for the relatively peaceful coexistence of a dominant and a subordinate species within an area. Although apparently effective for promoting the coexistence of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis), it is unknown whether this practice might be effective for other competing species pairs. We conducted an experiment to test whether providing paired identical boxes would promote the adjacent breeding of Eastern Bluebirds and 2 smaller/subordinate cavity nesters: the Carolina Chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) and the Brown-headed Nuthatch (Sitta pusilla). Our box pairs were of 2 types. Our Big/Small pairs consisted of one box with a bluebird-sized (38 mm) entrance hole and another with a 26 mm hole (too small for a bluebird but appropriate for a nuthatch or chickadee). Our other pairs (Big/Big) consisted of 2 boxes with identical 38 mm holes. Boxes within pairs were 10 m apart. If bluebirds are intolerant of subordinate cavity nesters breeding nearby, we would expect to find similar (and low) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. If, however, bluebirds simply defend their own nest cavity, we would expect to find similar (and high) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. Finally, if bluebirds guard all usable nest boxes in a small area, we would expect to find high occupation of Big/Small box pairs by nuthatches and chickadees and low occupation by these species of Big/ Big box pairs. We found that bluebirds excluded both nuthatches and chickadees from adjacent big-hole boxes but not from adjacent small-hole boxes, indicating that pairing identical boxes does not promote coexistence of bluebirds and these smaller species. Smaller, less competitive species require nest boxes that exclude larger and more competitive species.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Biological competition</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Boxes</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Brown-headed Nuthatch</subject><subject>cajas-nido pareadas</subject><subject>Carolina Chickadee</subject><subject>Cavity nesters</subject><subject>Cavity nesting</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>competencia por sitios de anidación</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Eastern Bluebird</subject><subject>Nest boxes</subject><subject>nest-site competition</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Occupancy</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>paired nest boxes</subject><subject>Poecile carolinensis</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>SHORT COMMUNICATIONS</subject><subject>Sialia sialis</subject><subject>Sitta pusilla</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Tachycineta bicolor</subject><issn>1559-4491</issn><issn>1938-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGs_ghAQQQ-rO8lmNzlqqX-goKCel2R3VlLaRJNdab-9qRU9eZn3GH68xwwhE8gvoazKK5CZ4ntkBIrLTBRFtZ-8ECorCgWH5CjGRZ6nNRcjEp-0Dda9UYexp8avMdLWp-F8T9-DX_keaeNxbWOPrkHqOzrTyQdHb5YDGhvaSM-frV5aTeNW4gXVrqVxMD601ultgP60_ea7A0M8JgedXkac_OiYvN7OXqb32fzx7mF6Pc8MU6rPMK8kF2VXSgXQaABTtGBKI3MouZECUWnOdcN5q3jXIHaVkYphiyi06JCPyekuN93xMaTueuGH4FJlzZhkBfBKQqLOdlQTfIwBu_o92JUOmxryevvPGmSteOJOdtwi9j78QqwCplgJf23Geu_wn5Qv_3p99Q</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Stanback, Mark T.</creator><creator>Niemasik, Esther</creator><creator>Millican, David</creator><creator>McGovern, Patrick</creator><general>Wilson Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Pairing nest boxes does not promote coexistence of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and subordinate cavity nesters</title><author>Stanback, Mark T. ; Niemasik, Esther ; Millican, David ; McGovern, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b299t-e078356f68911ca11b4d1b6b80163b85ee9a33ac33d93fceef7b892edee5a5fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Biological competition</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Boxes</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Brown-headed Nuthatch</topic><topic>cajas-nido pareadas</topic><topic>Carolina Chickadee</topic><topic>Cavity nesters</topic><topic>Cavity nesting</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>competencia por sitios de anidación</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Eastern Bluebird</topic><topic>Nest boxes</topic><topic>nest-site competition</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Occupancy</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>paired nest boxes</topic><topic>Poecile carolinensis</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>SHORT COMMUNICATIONS</topic><topic>Sialia sialis</topic><topic>Sitta pusilla</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Tachycineta bicolor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanback, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemasik, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millican, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanback, Mark T.</au><au>Niemasik, Esther</au><au>Millican, David</au><au>McGovern, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pairing nest boxes does not promote coexistence of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and subordinate cavity nesters</atitle><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>422-427</pages><issn>1559-4491</issn><eissn>1938-5447</eissn><abstract>Because nest site competition among cavity-nesting birds is often intense, the practice of pairing nest boxes has been promoted as a way to reduce nest-site competition and allow for the relatively peaceful coexistence of a dominant and a subordinate species within an area. Although apparently effective for promoting the coexistence of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) and Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis), it is unknown whether this practice might be effective for other competing species pairs. We conducted an experiment to test whether providing paired identical boxes would promote the adjacent breeding of Eastern Bluebirds and 2 smaller/subordinate cavity nesters: the Carolina Chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) and the Brown-headed Nuthatch (Sitta pusilla). Our box pairs were of 2 types. Our Big/Small pairs consisted of one box with a bluebird-sized (38 mm) entrance hole and another with a 26 mm hole (too small for a bluebird but appropriate for a nuthatch or chickadee). Our other pairs (Big/Big) consisted of 2 boxes with identical 38 mm holes. Boxes within pairs were 10 m apart. If bluebirds are intolerant of subordinate cavity nesters breeding nearby, we would expect to find similar (and low) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. If, however, bluebirds simply defend their own nest cavity, we would expect to find similar (and high) occupancy by nuthatches and chickadees in box pairs of either type containing bluebirds. Finally, if bluebirds guard all usable nest boxes in a small area, we would expect to find high occupation of Big/Small box pairs by nuthatches and chickadees and low occupation by these species of Big/ Big box pairs. We found that bluebirds excluded both nuthatches and chickadees from adjacent big-hole boxes but not from adjacent small-hole boxes, indicating that pairing identical boxes does not promote coexistence of bluebirds and these smaller species. Smaller, less competitive species require nest boxes that exclude larger and more competitive species.</abstract><cop>Fort Collins</cop><pub>Wilson Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.1676/18-93</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-4491
ispartof The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2019-06, Vol.131 (2), p.422-427
issn 1559-4491
1938-5447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2282413781
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Animal behavior
Biological competition
Birds
Boxes
Breeding
Brown-headed Nuthatch
cajas-nido pareadas
Carolina Chickadee
Cavity nesters
Cavity nesting
Coexistence
competencia por sitios de anidación
Competition
Eastern Bluebird
Nest boxes
nest-site competition
Nesting
Occupancy
Occupations
Ornithology
paired nest boxes
Poecile carolinensis
Population
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
Sialia sialis
Sitta pusilla
Species
Success
Tachycineta bicolor
title Pairing nest boxes does not promote coexistence of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and subordinate cavity nesters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A53%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pairing%20nest%20boxes%20does%20not%20promote%20coexistence%20of%20Eastern%20Bluebirds%20(Sialia%20sialis)%20and%20subordinate%20cavity%20nesters&rft.jtitle=The%20Wilson%20journal%20of%20ornithology&rft.au=Stanback,%20Mark%20T.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=422-427&rft.issn=1559-4491&rft.eissn=1938-5447&rft_id=info:doi/10.1676/18-93&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27129261%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b299t-e078356f68911ca11b4d1b6b80163b85ee9a33ac33d93fceef7b892edee5a5fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2282413781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27129261&rfr_iscdi=true